Frontegg vs Symantec Advanced Authentication comparison

Frontegg and Broadcom are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Frontegg is ranked #36, while Broadcom is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0. Frontegg holds a 0.6% mindshare in AS, compared to Broadcom’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

813 Views
244 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Advanced Authentic...

Read 9 Symantec Advanced Authentication reviews

371 Views
360 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Symantec Advanced Authentic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Symantec Advanced Authentication and Frontegg are competitors in the authentication solutions category. Frontegg seems to have the upper hand due to its simpler deployment, affordable pricing, and quicker ROI, as per user feedback.

What features are offered by Symantec Advanced Authentication in comparison to Frontegg?

Symantec Advanced Authentication provides comprehensive security measures, multi-factor authentication options, and robust encryption techniques. Frontegg offers seamless integration capabilities, an extensive range of developer-friendly options, and highly customizable user authentication workflows. Users are drawn to Frontegg's feature-rich environment even as they value the robustness of Symantec.

What areas of improvement can be found in Symantec Advanced Authentication in comparison to Frontegg?

Symantec Advanced Authentication needs a more modern interface, quicker performance, and better user experience. Frontegg could benefit from more granular control over specific settings, enhanced documentation, and additional user management features. Users suggest fewer improvements for Frontegg compared to Symantec.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Symantec Advanced Authentication in comparison to Frontegg?

Symantec Advanced Authentication involves a more complex deployment process but has commendable customer service. Frontegg is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive support team. Users favor Frontegg for easier deployment and comparable customer service quality.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Symantec Advanced Authentication in comparison to Frontegg?

Symantec Advanced Authentication users find the setup cost to be high while acknowledging good ROI over time. Frontegg users highlight its affordable pricing and quicker ROI. Frontegg is perceived to offer better value for money in terms of pricing and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Symantec Advanced Authentication Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Symantec Advanced Authentication

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Authentication Systems

36th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (19th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (13th)

Symantec Advanced Authentic...

Ranking in Authentication Systems

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Advanced Authentication is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Symantec Advanced Authentication	0.6%
Frontegg	0.6%
Other	98.8%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

reviewer1660836

DevOps Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system

It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file. For security certifications, we need to make sure we can restore all of our products and data in minimal time. We are backing up the data using the API but it will be better to export everything to an external file so in case of a disaster or mistake from our side, we can have the option to reload all the users and assign them to the relevant tenant as fast as possible

Read full review

Umair (Abu Mohaymin) Akhlaque

Group CEO at Flexsolutions

Ensures robust security features and ease of deployment, although it may lack some of the more modern authentication options

There has been a need for aggressive development to modernize the product and align it with contemporary security requirements. While the rebranding has been a step forward, further enhancements are essential to meet the evolving demands of the market. It lacks features such as ActiveSync Exchange security, and it doesn't offer alternatives like password-less authentication via biometrics or patches. While Symantec mainly relies on traditional token-based or password-based methods, newer authentication methods are missing from its repertoire. Support services often lack promptness and depth of knowledge, leaving customers waiting for weeks to resolve issues. In the realm of multifactor authentication, swift resolution of problems is critical, as any slowdown or interruption can significantly impact operations. Urgent improvement is necessary to ensure that support responses are faster and more effective, aligning with the demands of MFA implementation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"It tells us exactly what we want in terms of authentication to various applications and provides protection for users who access them."

"One of the most valuable aspects is its remarkable stability."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is that it's a strong authentication solution that's able to integrate with applications."

"Rules on Risk Authentication are very good."

Cons

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"This solution could be improved with risk-based authentication. I think that this product has everything that most customers are looking for, but modern technology has people looking for security tools with risk-based authentication, which they have a separate tool for. If they could integrate this, it would improve Symantec Advanced Authentication. They have to look at what's newly trending and how things are moving forward, and then adapt and adopt those features. Symantec's technical support should also be improved, in terms of response time."

"Advanced Authentication talks about the Device ID. But how the device ID is captured, I want to know more about that."

"We have seen quite a few issues with bugginess. It is indeed pretty buggy and we have had to install some fixes."

"Urgent improvement is necessary to ensure that support responses are faster and more effective, aligning with the demands of MFA implementation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There are eventually going to be implementation costs. Sometimes you're required to have custom code developments there, so that has to be part of the implementation price."

"The price is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Symantec Advanced Authentication?

One of the most valuable aspects is its remarkable stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Advanced Authentication?

The price is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Advanced Authentication?

See all answers

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Frontegg

Compared 46% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 17% of the time

Clerk.com vs Frontegg

Compared 10% of the time

Descope vs Frontegg

Compared 9% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Thales Authenticators vs Symantec Advanced Authentication

Compared 100% of the time

More Symantec Advanced Authentication Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

September 2025

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Advanced Authentication

September 2025

Download Symantec Advanced Authentication product report

Also Known As

No data available

CA Advanced Authentication, CA Strong Authentication, CA Risk Authentication, Arcot WebFort, Arcot RiskFort

Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

CA Advanced Authentication provides a secure, user-convenient and cost-effective way to protect online and mobile applications. The solution consists of two components: CA Risk Authentication allows the enterprise to silently and transparently collect data and assess risk based on device identification, location and user behavior, among other factors, and CA Strong Authentication provides a wide variety of software-based, two-factor authentication credentials and technology to make passwords more secure. Together they enable an intelligent, layered security approach to protect user identities and organizational data.

Take the assessment

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Global bank, Large Filipino Bank and SK Infosec

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Symantec Advanced Authentication

September 2025

Free Report: Frontegg vs. Symantec Advanced Authentication

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Symantec Advanced Authentication and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. Symantec Advanced Authentication report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.