Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Frontegg vs RSA Adaptive Authentication comparison

Frontegg and RSA are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Frontegg is ranked #30, while RSA is ranked #26. Frontegg holds a 0.4% mindshare in AS, compared to RSA’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of RSA users who would recommend it.
Frontegg
Read 6 Frontegg reviews
  • 207 Views
  • 138 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
RSA Adaptive Authentication
Read 6 RSA Adaptive Authentication reviews
  • 254 Views
  • 203 Comparison Views
71% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

RSA Adaptive Authentication and Frontegg offer distinct security solutions. While RSA Adaptive Authentication excels in risk-based analysis for data protection, Frontegg stands out with robust integration features and a modern user management approach.

What features are offered by RSA Adaptive Authentication in comparison to Frontegg?

RSA Adaptive Authentication provides risk-based analytics, multi-factor authentication, and advanced data protection. Frontegg offers seamless integrations, flexibility in managing user permissions, and modern user management capabilities.

What areas of improvement can be found in RSA Adaptive Authentication in comparison to Frontegg?

RSA Adaptive Authentication could enhance integration with other systems, improve user reviews, and simplify integrations. Frontegg needs better documentation, improved support services, and enhanced user experience resources.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of RSA Adaptive Authentication in comparison to Frontegg?

RSA Adaptive Authentication has a straightforward deployment process but needs better customer service responsiveness. Frontegg offers quick and efficient deployment with superior customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with RSA Adaptive Authentication in comparison to Frontegg?

RSA Adaptive Authentication has high setup costs but offers justifiable ROI. Frontegg has more competitive pricing and faster ROI, appealing to smaller organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Frontegg vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg
Ranking in Authentication Systems
30th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (18th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (9th)
RSA Adaptive Authentication
Ranking in Authentication Systems
26th
Average Rating
6.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Adaptive Authentication is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Authentication Systems
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1645395 - PeerSpot reviewer
Intuitive with reCaptcha integration and helpful technical support
Frontegg's solution fits us very well, as it removes the extra work of developing, maintaining, storing, and securing all of the user-management platforms. It saves us a lot of time and money every single day. Frontegg allows our organization to focus on what matters - creating meaningful, innovative solutions for our customers without wasting time and energy on problems that were already solved by the industry many, many times before. Without Frontegg, our dev velocity would have been compromised greatly, since we would have to invest in a lot of resources to maintain a properly secured, granular, and flexible user-management framework.
Read full review
AR
It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs
RSA Adaptive Authentication is one of the most used tools for stopping fraud in the world. The tool is very good variable to take into account when deciding what product to choose. I think RSA is best options in this field since the tool is a really good piece of engineering.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."
"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."
"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."
"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."
"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."
"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."
"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."
"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."
"Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA."
"Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features."
"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement."
 

Cons

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."
"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."
"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"
"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."
"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."
"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."
"I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages..."
"Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further."
"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."
"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."
"It has taken years to implement."
"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."
"The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."
"You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."
"Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Educational Organization
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Financial Services Firm
50%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Frontegg Logo
Auth0 vs Frontegg
Compared 64% of the time
WorkOS vs Frontegg Logo
WorkOS vs Frontegg
Compared 14% of the time
Descope vs Frontegg Logo
Descope vs Frontegg
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg
Compared 10% of the time
More Frontegg Competitors
RSA Authentication Manager vs RSA Adaptive Authentication Logo
RSA Authentication Manager vs RSA Adaptive Authentication
Compared 54% of the time
ThreatMetrix vs RSA Adaptive Authentication Logo
ThreatMetrix vs RSA Adaptive Authentication
Compared 46% of the time
More RSA Adaptive Authentication Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Single Sign-On (SSO)
April 2025
Frontegg reportDownload Frontegg product report
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2025
RSA Adaptive Authentication reportDownload RSA Adaptive Authentication product report
 

Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg
RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.
RSA
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
Buyer's Guide
Frontegg vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication
April 2025
Free Report: Frontegg vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication
Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Frontegg vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication report.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.