IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Katalon Studio vs froglogic Squish comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
froglogic Logo
5,416 views|2,789 comparisons
Katalon Studio Logo
11,315 views|8,620 comparisons
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac.""froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

More froglogic Squish Pros →

"The scalability of the product is good.""User-friendly and a good solution.""The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is that everything can be managed from one platform.""One of the features that I like is Object Recognition. It worked very well, and it allowed me to create a dynamic expert based on my requirements.""The most valuable feature is that the browser and the API testing is available in a single tool, and I don't have to look at other options.""The initial setup is pretty straightforward and easy enough to complete.""The best thing about the solution is that there is a record and playback functionality.""Katalon Studio's biggest advantage is its price. It's a good tool for the price, albeit with some limitations when you compare it with tools like Tricentis Tosca."

More Katalon Studio Pros →

Cons
"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package.""ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

More froglogic Squish Cons →

"One improvement would be if it could support more programming languages such as JavaScript or Python. Right now, it is only on Groovy, which I think is not a too popular language.""Currently, I'm the only one who can use it because I have a Mac. It is giving a hard time to my team members who are on Linux. My team members are using Linux, and Katalon doesn't support Linux very well. It keeps on crashing. It crashes and shuts down almost every time they save their work, so they are not able to use it. It should have good support for Linux. We don't know what the problem is. If the Katalon team can pick up this issue, it will be very helpful.""One aspect that can be improved is testing for desktop applications. I would like to see them support more technologies in this area.""The price of the solution is a bit high. It's one of the reasons we decided not to continue using the product.""Katalon lacks integration with other software, including integrating other languages like .NET and PHP.""The free version of the solution is not user friendly at all.""Now we are having difficulties in using it and had to limit our automation experts to the features that Katalon allows us to use for free. It was free access and they claimed that it would be free for all time.""It would be helpful if they can integrate a feature for performance testing."

More Katalon Studio Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We are using the free version of Katalon Studio at this point."
  • "The price is not high it's good."
  • "We are using the free version. We plan on getting a paid version because there is a limitation in terms of the number of users. We want to maximize it."
  • "I am using the free version."
  • "Its pricing is quite reasonable. If you require their help in getting started, then there is a professional services fee on top of the product license cost."
  • "In terms of pricing, Katalon, Selenium, and Cypress all represent a similar level of investment. The software for these tools are either true open source or almost open source (because they charge a small fee), so pricing is a neutral point for me."
  • "The cost of Katalon Studio is expensive but it is less than some of the other solutions, such as Micro Focus UFT or SmartBear TestComplete. The cost is the main reason we are using Katalon Studio."
  • More Katalon Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    608,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company.
    Top Answer:There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together… more »
    Top Answer:froglogic Squish is a tool used for GUI regression testing. If any of our clients have a particular GUI and they want to do a GUI regression testing or fully automated testing and specifically have… more »
    Top Answer:User-friendly and a good solution.
    Top Answer:The cost is on the high side and it would be helpful if there were two packages available with a distinction made between the standard features most companies are looking for at a cheaper cost and a… more »
    Top Answer:Katalon lacks integration ability with other software, including integrating other languages like .NET and PHP. I've also had issues with new releases as the system often crashes and the previous… more »
    Ranking
    14th
    Views
    5,416
    Comparisons
    2,789
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    532
    Rating
    8.5
    6th
    Views
    11,315
    Comparisons
    8,620
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    548
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Reliable GUI Test Automation that works.

    Use Squish for the automation of your cross-platform desktop, mobile, embedded and web GUI tests.

    Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.

    The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features

    • Desktop, Mobile, Embedded & Web Applications
    • include Qt, QtQuick, QML, Java, AWT, Swing, SWT, RCP, JavaFx, Windows, Mac, Tk, 4Js, iOS, Android, Embedded (Qt, Windows, Java) and Web, HTML5, Flex & JavaApplets.
    • testing on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, Unix. Mobile and Embedded testing on Android, iOS, embedded Linux and RTOSes such as QNX
    • Eclipse-based IDE
    • based object identification & Toolkit API Support
    • tests in your choice of Python, JavaScript, Perl, Ruby & Tcl
    • BDD tests with built-in (Gherkin) Feature File recording, playback & reporting
    • testing capabilities
    • complete with drill-down details, execution statistics and multiple output formats
    • options with many ALM and Continuous Integration tools for executing and managing tests as well as a complete command-line interface


    Katalon Studio is a simple and powerful automation solution built by KMS Technology for testers everywhere. The tool provides features comparable to popular commercial solutions while eliminating the hassle of building an automation framework from open sources. Best of all, we are committed to keeping Katalon Studio free.

    Offer
    Learn more about froglogic Squish
    Learn more about Katalon Studio
    Sample Customers
    Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
    Coca-Cola Tesla Black Board TaTa Consultancy Services Sony
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Government5%
    REVIEWERS
    University17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Transportation Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Government7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Katalon Studio vs. froglogic Squish
    May 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Katalon Studio vs. froglogic Squish and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
    608,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    froglogic Squish is ranked 14th in Test Automation Tools with 2 reviews while Katalon Studio is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 13 reviews. froglogic Squish is rated 8.6, while Katalon Studio is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Great record and playback functionality but isn't user-friendly and needs better technical support ". froglogic Squish is most compared with Ranorex Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Selenium HQ, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and LEAPWORK, whereas Katalon Studio is most compared with TestProject, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete, Ranorex Studio and Automation Anywhere (AA). See our Katalon Studio vs. froglogic Squish report.

    See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.