Fortify Application Defender vs Virsec Security Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
1,930 views|1,621 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
Virsec Systems Logo
240 views|146 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortify Application Defender and Virsec Security Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool's most valuable feature is software composition analysis. This feature works well with my .NET applications, providing a better understanding of library vulnerabilities.""Its ability to find security defects is valuable.""The solution helped us to improve the code quality of our organization.""Fortify Application Defender's most valuable features are machine learning algorithms, real-time remediation, and automatic vulnerability notifications.""The information from Fortify Application Defender on how to fix and solve issues is very good compared to other solutions.""The product saves us cost and time.""The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically feed it rules what it's coupled with the WebInspect dynamic application scanning technology.""The most valuable feature is that it analyzes data in real-time."

More Fortify Application Defender Pros →

"We use the solution for Zero-day protection."

More Virsec Security Platform Pros →

Cons
"Fortify Application Defender gives a lot of false positives.""I encountered many false positives for Python applications.""The workbench is a little bit complex when you first start using it.""The product should integrate industry-standard code review tools internally with its system. This would streamline the coding process, as developers wouldn't need multiple tools for code review and security checks. Many independent and open-source tools are available, from Apache to various libraries. Using multiple DevOps pipeline tools can slow the turnaround time.""Support for older compilers/IDEs is lacking.""The false positive rate should be lower.""The solution could improve the time it takes to scan. When comparing it to SonarQube it does it in minutes while in Fortify Application Defender it can take hours.""The solution is quite expensive."

More Fortify Application Defender Cons →

"The tool's dashboard needs to load since it is not responsive and takes time to load."

More Virsec Security Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The base licensing costs for the SaaS platform is about $900 USD per application, per year."
  • "The price of this solution could be less expensive."
  • "The licensing is very complex, it's project based and can range from $10,000 to $200,000+ depending on the project type and size."
  • "Fortify Application Defender is very expensive."
  • "The product’s price is much higher than other tools."
  • "I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. It comes as an annual cloud subscription. The tool's pricing is around 50 lakhs."
  • More Fortify Application Defender Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
  • More Virsec Security Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I find the configuration of rules in Fortify Application Defender useful. Its integration is also easy.
    Top Answer:The product should integrate industry-standard code review tools internally with its system. This would streamline the coding process, as developers wouldn't need multiple tools for code review and… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution for fast code review. It is integrated into our DevOps pipeline.
    Top Answer:Hi Julia - I've been with Virsec as the Sr. Director, Product Marketing for the last three quarters and I have never seen a competitive opportunity arise versus Contrast. Perhaps the confusion lies in… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution for Zero-day protection.
    Top Answer:I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,930
    Comparisons
    1,621
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    325
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    240
    Comparisons
    146
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    180
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HPE Fortify Application Defender, Micro Focus Fortify Application Defender
    Virsec
    Learn More
    Overview

    Micro Focus Security Fortify Application Defender is a runtime application self-protection (RASP) solution that helps you manage and mitigate risk from homegrown or third-party applications. It provides centralized visibility into application use and abuse while protecting from software vulnerability exploits and other violations in real time.

    Virsec Security Platform (VSP) is an enterprise cybersecurity solution that continuously protects application, web and host workloads against advanced cyber threats and neutralizes zero-day exploits with zero dwell time (milliseconds). The Virsec Security Platform (VSP) aligns with Zero Trust Architectural approaches and presents a portfolio of compensating security controls that automate the enforcement of runtime execution of authorized processes, scripts, libraries and dependencies that harden Windows and Linux Host OS (Operating System) server, application, and web workloads at runtime.

    Sample Customers
    ServiceMaster, Saltworks, SAP
    Broadcom, Allstate, Department of Homeland Security
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Logistics Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Healthcare Company23%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Tools
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortify Application Defender is ranked 30th in Application Security Tools with 11 reviews while Virsec Security Platform is ranked 35th in Application Security Tools with 1 review. Fortify Application Defender is rated 7.8, while Virsec Security Platform is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Fortify Application Defender writes "Useful for fast code review in devOps pipelines ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Virsec Security Platform writes "Helps with Zero-day protection ". Fortify Application Defender is most compared with Checkmarx One, Coverity, CAST Application Intelligence Platform, SonarQube and Qualys Web Application Scanning, whereas Virsec Security Platform is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, CrowdStrike Falcon and Trend Vision One - Cloud Security.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.