Fivetran vs Tray.io comparison

Fivetran and Tray.io are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7, while Tray.io is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.5. Fivetran holds a 4.1% mindshare in CDI, compared to Tray.io’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tray.io users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 29 Fivetran reviews

7,017 Views
2,526 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Tray.io

Read 5 Tray.io reviews

2,137 Views
598 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

Tray.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fivetran and Tray.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. Tray.io Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Tray.io

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,838 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (13th), Data Replication (3rd)

Tray.io

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (26th), Low-Code Development Platforms (27th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 4.1%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tray.io is 1.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fivetran	4.1%
Tray.io	1.4%
Other	94.5%

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Usman

Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot

Has accelerated data integration workflows and supports seamless development of custom connectors

I've worked extensively with Fivetran, mainly used for extraction purposes, and I've worked with the transformation element in it as well. Fivetran not only has built-in connectors but also provides SDK connectors, allowing us to develop our own connectors in an easy manner. I don't have to write raw Python scripts or dumping scripts; it offers straightforward examples and guidelines, making it much simpler to develop custom connectors inside Fivetran. We've been able to develop many custom connectors as well, which is unique and beneficial for having everything centralized instead of having those connectors located elsewhere. One of the best features by Fivetran is its clean, simple, and intuitive UI. It includes a transformation section where I can deploy my DBT queries and scripts. It also supplies good tracking capabilities for billing estimates and user permissions, allowing for customization to the desired level. The number of connectors it has remains a standout feature, and within connectors, the options available are very helpful. Although it sometimes appears static due to its built-in nature, it offers good flexibility for data transformation and caching, which I appreciate because it saves us extensive script-writing time.

Read full review

Amrit Dash

Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees

Automated student enrollments have reduced manual work and now free our team for higher-value support

Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved. There is a steep learning curve in user accessibility; the builder is highly developer-centric, making it difficult for a non-technical team member to modify or troubleshoot workflows. Introducing a more intuitive visual interface similar to what we have in make.com right now would make the platform much more collaborative and easier to work with for any non-technical folks or newly onboarded engineers, allowing them to be briefed faster. Visual debugging is another area where troubleshooting complex nested loops can feel very abstract. Having clearer, more visual step-by-step data tracking during test runs would speed up the development and testing process. The pricing model is geared heavily towards enterprise budgets; offering more flexible mid-market pricing tiers would make it more accessible for a growing organization that wants a small start and scale up gradually. The core platform security is highly robust and easily meets our requirements for SOC 2 and GDPR compliance. However, when utilizing their AI features such as Merlin AI with sensitive student data, we maintain a very cautious approach. While Tray.io provides enterprise-grade governance guardrails and data masking capabilities, our internal compliance policies prevent us from passing any personally identifiable student information directly through AI-driven processors. We trust Tray.io's underlying infrastructure security, but we believe organizations must still enforce strict data filtering protocols on their end to ensure student privacy is maintained. During our evaluation, we tested the AI capabilities in a sandbox environment, primarily using it to generate workflow drafts and natural language prompts from web data schemas. Strength-wise, it is highly capable when it comes to translating simple text descriptions into functional workflow templates. It serves as a great accelerator, helping to map standard files quickly and reducing the initial setup time for basic integrations. For issues, in the case of highly custom APIs or deeply nested data structures, accuracy declines. We noticed occasional misinterpretation of complex schemas, meaning our developers still had to manually review and correct the outputs. It is a highly helpful productivity booster but still requires human oversight for enterprise-grade reliability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of setting up the connectors and transformations is highly valuable."

"Making the decision to implement Fivetran was supported by the fact that they have better connectors than other competitors."

"Fivetran's technical support is really good, and if you're on their enterprise plan, they usually respond within an hour and keep you continuously updated on progress."

"Fivetran provides time savings, cost reductions, and improvements in data quality, and when the time investment decreases, fewer developers are needed, which means significant savings."

"The simplicity and scalability are the strongest features of Fivetran."

"The most important feature of the solution is its ability to build data pipelines in less time."

"The portal is very intuitive and easy to use."

"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."

More Fivetran pros

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by reducing the amount of redundant tasks that our team performs by approximately 80%, and the numbers are quite significant with the workflows alone, as we are working towards creating and utilizing AI within these workflows as well."

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once."

"During our three to six-month evaluation pilot, automating our student enrollment sync with Tray.io delivered proper operational improvements."

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by helping us keep our internal database and this third-party service in sync, and it has really helped us automate a lot of that work because it is fairly straightforward to maintain and develop."

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by helping to manage webhooks easily and workflows easily, and it has improved collaboration so that other clients can use webhooks."

Cons

"Their pricing has increased over the years, so it's not seen as an advantage anymore."

"Fivetran is very expensive for data sources with a lot of rows, such as email data. I would like to see cheaper pricing for data sources like that."

"There was a random change to our contract in a unilateral manner after the first year. The overall cost of using Fivetran was then unclear and this is the reason I would not recommend this solution."

"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks."

"The documentation is decent, but it's hard to find information online about Fivetran. For example, if you try to search for an error code, you won't find much information about it in forums."

"This solution needs to improve its real-time data and transformation availability."

"The experience of using SDK connectors can be improved, as it lacks computational power, which is an area that needs enhancement."

"HVR Software's technical support could be improved. Whenever we log a case, the response that we get from the support is a bit delayed."

More Fivetran cons

"Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved."

"One way Tray.io could be improved, especially for people coming in with no real coding experience, is with more comprehensive error messages."

"I have found that the error management in my main use case with Tray.io is not as effective as we would prefer."

"There is not much that can be improved in Tray.io. It is a good tool, but debug can be improved further and the solutions can be improved further."

"As our product got more complex, we needed to add more and more complexity to Tray.io in terms of our setup, and that is when the benefits of it being no-code or low-code started to pale in comparison to the cost of making everything slightly more complicated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"The solution is affordable."

"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,838 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tray.io?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tray.io?

We used and evaluated Tray.io for approximately three to six months during a proof of concept evaluation phase. During this period, our engineering and operation teams utilized the platform to buil...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tray.io?

I give Tray.io an eight out of ten rating mostly because of how it is developer-centric and lacks a low-code platform and the pricing. The reduction in manual data tasks had a direct positive impac...

See all answers

Comparisons

SSIS vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

Denodo vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 3% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 3% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Zapier vs Tray.io

Compared 13% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Tray.io

Compared 11% of the time

Workato vs Tray.io

Compared 10% of the time

SnapLogic vs Tray.io

Compared 10% of the time

Appian vs Tray.io

Compared 2% of the time

More Tray.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

June 2026

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Tray.io

May 2026

Download Tray.io product report

Overview

Fivetran offers a seamless, scalable data integration platform with strong connectors and real-time synchronization. Tailored for managing ETL workflows and integrating with DBT, it appeals to organizations seeking efficient data management.

Fivetran distinguishes itself through its intuitive interface and extensive scalability, allowing businesses to manage entire ETL workflows seamlessly. Its robust connectors ensure smooth integration with multiple data sources, while transparent logging and minimal coding requirements enhance accessibility. With real-time data synchronization, organizations benefit from up-to-date insights for analytics and engineering purposes. While some users point out areas for improvement like better documentation and expanded integration options, Fivetran remains a cherished tool for centralizing data in data warehouses such as supporting change data capture, migrations, and synchronizations from systems like Salesforce, NetSuite, and Google Analytics. Operating within an ELT framework, it empowers businesses to streamline data processes without complex extraction logic.

What are the key features of Fivetran?

Ease of Use: Intuitive platform minimizing setup complexity
Scalability: Adapt to growing data needs efficiently
Powerful Connectors: Seamless integration with diverse data sources
Real-Time Synchronization: Instant data updates supporting timely insights
DBT Integration: Simplifies transformations within ETL workflows
Transparent Logging: Provides clear visibility into operations

Which benefits can users expect in reviews?

Cost-Effective Scalability: Manage increased data without significant financial impact
Minimal Coding: Reduces technical barriers enhancing accessibility
Comprehensive Data Management: Centralizes diverse data streams effectively
Timely Analytics: Real-time updates foster actionable insights
Streamlined Workflow Management: Efficiently handles complex ETL processes

In industry-specific implementation, Fivetran is integral for businesses requiring robust data integration to power analytics. Retailers utilize it to consolidate e-commerce data for sales insights, while finance firms rely on its capabilities to merge financial data for reporting. In the tech sector, it supports engineering teams by providing a reliable data pipeline that fuels app development and performance monitoring.

Fivetran

Tray.io is an advanced integration platform that allows seamless connectivity between applications, designed to automate workflows and streamline business processes.

Tray.io provides an extensive library of pre-built connectors and powerful automation tools, making it easy for businesses to boost efficiency. Its drag-and-drop workflow builder enables integration without code, catering to both technical and non-technical users. Being highly customizable and scalable, Tray.io helps companies adapt quickly to changing requirements, ensuring smooth operations and effective data management.

What are the key features of Tray.io?

Visual Workflow Builder: Offers an intuitive drag-and-drop interface for easy workflow creation.
Pre-built Connectors: Extensive library allowing quick integration with popular apps and services.
Customizable Logic: Lets users define conditions and logic that fit their business needs.
Scalability: Supports growing volumes and complex automations smoothly.
Error Handling: Efficiently detects and manages errors within workflows.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Automates routine tasks, freeing up resources for strategic activities.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces operational costs through smart automation.
Flexibility: Adapts to business-specific processes and changes in scale.
Reduced Development Time: Saves time with no-code integrations and pre-built connectors.

Tray.io is utilized across diverse industries such as e-commerce, where it integrates order management systems to provide seamless customer experiences. In marketing, it connects CRM platforms to enhance lead nurturing. In finance, it streamlines data flow between accounting software, improving financial reporting accuracy.

Tray.io

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Copper, DigitalOcean, Udemy, AdRoll, FICO, Outreach

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Tray.io

June 2026

Free Report: Fivetran vs. Tray.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. Tray.io and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,838 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. Tray.io report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.