Fivetran vs Qlik Compose comparison

Fivetran and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3, while Qlik is ranked #45. Fivetran holds a 1.7% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 29 Fivetran reviews

4,172 Views
2,587 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,513 Views
1,316 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Fivetran

Qlik Compose

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Compose and Fivetran compete in the data operations category. Fivetran appears to have the upper hand owing to its comprehensive feature set, despite Qlik Compose being favored for its pricing and customer support.

Features: Qlik Compose is renowned for its ETL capabilities, data warehouse automation, and ease of use regarding drag-and-drop functionality. Its intuitive nature and modeling as well as code generation capabilities make it popular. On the other hand, Fivetran offers real-time data syncing, a wide range of connectors, and seamless interface usability. Its simplicity in setting up data pipelines and its automatic handling of data integration make it appealing for various environments.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Compose could enhance its range of supported integrations and simplify deployment procedures. Some users mention a desire for more automation features and greater scalability. Fivetran, meanwhile, might focus on improving customer service response times, refining its pricing model for smaller operations, and expanding transformation tools in lower pricing plans.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fivetran is valued for its easy deployment and fast setup, though some find its customer service less responsive. It handles large data volumes efficiently. Qlik Compose, while requiring technical expertise for setup, compensates with a responsive customer service team that enhances user experience through proactive support.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Compose offers a transparent pricing structure, delivering favorable ROI for companies focusing on structured data management. While Fivetran may have a steeper pricing model, the cost can be offset by extensive features and continuous data updates. Its ROI is justified by enhanced data handling capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. Qlik Compose Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Qlik Compose

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Integration

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (9th)

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

45th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 1.7%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Fivetran	1.7%
Qlik Compose	0.9%
Other	97.4%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Usman

Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot

Has accelerated data integration workflows and supports seamless development of custom connectors

I've worked extensively with Fivetran, mainly used for extraction purposes, and I've worked with the transformation element in it as well. Fivetran not only has built-in connectors but also provides SDK connectors, allowing us to develop our own connectors in an easy manner. I don't have to write raw Python scripts or dumping scripts; it offers straightforward examples and guidelines, making it much simpler to develop custom connectors inside Fivetran. We've been able to develop many custom connectors as well, which is unique and beneficial for having everything centralized instead of having those connectors located elsewhere. One of the best features by Fivetran is its clean, simple, and intuitive UI. It includes a transformation section where I can deploy my DBT queries and scripts. It also supplies good tracking capabilities for billing estimates and user permissions, allowing for customization to the desired level. The number of connectors it has remains a standout feature, and within connectors, the options available are very helpful. Although it sometimes appears static due to its built-in nature, it offers good flexibility for data transformation and caching, which I appreciate because it saves us extensive script-writing time.

Read full review

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Making the decision to implement Fivetran was supported by the fact that they have better connectors than other competitors."

"SysTrack load is the best feature."

"The solution is stable. We've never faced any stability issues."

"Fivetran provides time savings, cost reductions, and improvements in data quality, and when the time investment decreases, fewer developers are needed, which means significant savings."

"The ease of usability is the most valuable feature. It's very easy and quick to set up. It also has a central hub as opposed to GoldenGate which is one direct interface. For GoldenGate I would have needed three interfaces whereas with HVR I have a central interface that manages everything."

"Overall, I would rate Fivetran nine out of ten."

"Its arrays are powerful enough to handle migrations even when the replication is happening in the background, without causing any trouble with the ongoing traffic."

"The most valuable feature of Fivetran is that it only synchronizes what needs to be synchronized."

More Fivetran pros

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"It's a stable solution."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

More Qlik Compose pros

Cons

"Fivetran would be improved by adding the ability to integrate the data from third-party APIs."

"If Fivetran can build in more transformations, that would be really helpful in my opinion."

"The solution is very expensive. I would like to have a better integration of the solution with Azure."

"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"Their pricing has increased over the years, so it's not seen as an advantage anymore."

"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks."

"There is not a lot of options to customize the pipeline, and the cost is high."

"I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies."

More Fivetran cons

"There could be more customization options."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

More Qlik Compose cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"The solution is affordable."

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

Denodo vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 20% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 12% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 11% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

January 2026

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

January 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Also Known As

No data available

Compose, Attunity Compose

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Poly-Wood

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Qlik Compose

January 2026

Free Report: Fivetran vs. Qlik Compose

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. Qlik Compose and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. Qlik Compose report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.