IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Fischer Identity Automated Provisioning vs Imanami GroupID comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
User Provisioning Software
July 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software. Updated: July 2022.
620,068 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high."
  • "It is licensed per managed user per year."
  • "There were a lot of administrator, partner, and supplier accounts for people who were no longer working for us but still in the system. So, we reduced the number of users no longer with the company, which saved us some money on licensing."
  • "It's a fair price for the on-premises system. Compared with what we had before, it's much cheaper and we get all the modules in one. We tried to go with the cloud, but it was far too expensive."
  • "From an on-prem point of view, the cost is quite transparent and reasonable. The direct cost is primarily for licenses and maintenance on licenses."
  • More Omada Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "It is on a yearly basis, and it has the product license fee and the support for it. So, there is the licensing fee, and there is the annual maintenance that includes the support. I don't remember exactly, but we're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of $20,000 to $30,000 for it per year. We've got a pretty large implementation of it, and for the amount that we do, it is a pretty good deal. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."
  • More Imanami GroupID Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Provisioning Software solutions are best for your needs.
    620,068 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Because we are a partner and an IT service provider, we have a special licensing agreement because we are planning to… more »
    Top Answer:I would like to see some additional functionality and improvements in usability.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job… more »
    Top Answer:It is on a yearly basis, and it has the product license fee and the support for it. So, there is the licensing fee, and… more »
    Top Answer:I'd like to see it be able to do more than just groups. I'd like it to be able to do some things with email distribution… more »
    Also Known As
    Omada Identity Suite
    Learn More

    Omada Identity delivers an end-to-end identity and access management solution with essential identity governance functionality for secure, compliant, and efficient administration of all users' access rights across on-premises or cloud-based systems. The solution provides configurable best practice processes that covers all identity and access related scenarios from providing an access risk overview, management of identities lifecycle, to automated enforcement of policies.

    Real Security
    Manual intervention creates the possibility of malicious behavior. Automated provisioning will decrease your organizational risk by providing the mechanism that can enable you to restrict administrative access. And restricting administrative access is step #1 to a mature IAM Program.
    Data Integrity
    Once automation is in place. The right attributes will be automatically provisioned to the correct target systems with the proper value. Attribute management is often over-looked and discarded, but without automated attribute management, the integrity of any authentication transaction is suspect.
    Business Process Oversight
    Every automated provisioning solution requires attributes with correct values. Bad data is 100% created by human-driven intake processes. Introduce automation to not only streamline access, but also to double check your intake processes. Bad data is not Identity’s fault, but Identity can help you fix it.
    Automation creates a predictable process. Predictability is key to ultimately gaining control of your business. Automation breeds repeat-ability. Repeat-ability creates efficiency. Efficiency creates more time. More time focused on your business is what control feels like.

    Groups don’t live forever. Project teams disband, departments re-organize, and employees change status. GroupID from Imanami leverages the pervasiveness of Microsoft® Active Directory and empowers IT professionals with the tools needed to effectively provision and manage users. Users can be quickly entered into the correct distribution and security groups, and are easily managed across multiple systems.

    There Are Three Main Benefits To A Complete Group Management Solution:

    • Reduce the load on the IT staff and helpdesk
    • Improve employee productivity by putting users in the correct distribution groups immediately
    • Improve security by having each security group’s membership accurate immediately

    Groups Are Never Out Of Date.

    Users are empowered to solve common problems independently. Security and access aren’t compromised. IT is empowered with the right tools to help employees. Staff productivity goes up. What more could you want?

    Learn more about Omada Identity
    Learn more about Fischer Identity Automated Provisioning
    Learn more about Imanami GroupID
    Sample Customers
    Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group
    Information Not Available
    Grant Thornton LLP
    Top Industries
    Computer Software Company20%
    Mining And Metals Company10%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company32%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    No Data Available
    Computer Software Company34%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise69%
    No Data Available
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    User Provisioning Software
    July 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software. Updated: July 2022.
    620,068 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fischer Identity Automated Provisioning is ranked 26th in User Provisioning Software while Imanami GroupID is ranked 11th in User Provisioning Software with 2 reviews. Fischer Identity Automated Provisioning is rated 0.0, while Imanami GroupID is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imanami GroupID writes "Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement". Fischer Identity Automated Provisioning is most compared with , whereas Imanami GroupID is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Oracle Identity Governance, Symantec Identity Governance and Administration and One Identity Active Roles.

    See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors.

    We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.