Imanami GroupID vs One Identity Active Roles comparison

Imanami and One Identity are both solutions in the Active Directory Management category. Imanami is ranked #19, while One Identity is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6. Imanami holds a 2.8% mindshare in ADM, compared to One Identity’s 11.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Imanami users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Imanami GroupID

Read 3 Imanami GroupID reviews

1,135 Views
363 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Active Roles

Read 58 One Identity Active Roles reviews

6,946 Views
2,987 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Imanami GroupID

One Identity Active Roles

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 9, 2024

One Identity Active Roles and Imanami GroupID are leading identity and access management solutions. One Identity Active Roles is favored for support and pricing satisfaction, while Imanami GroupID stands out for its features and user perception of value.

What features are offered by One Identity Active Roles in comparison to Imanami GroupID?

One Identity Active Roles offers comprehensive customization capabilities, automation, and responsive customer service. Imanami GroupID provides granular group management, detailed reporting features, and excellent feature-value balance.

What areas of improvement can be found in One Identity Active Roles in comparison to Imanami GroupID?

One Identity Active Roles needs improved documentation, enhanced reporting capabilities, and better integration options. Imanami GroupID requires a more intuitive process, improved integration options, and better usability enhancements.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of One Identity Active Roles in comparison to Imanami GroupID?

One Identity Active Roles receives positive feedback on deployment ease and customer service responsiveness. Imanami GroupID users report a steeper learning curve but find the customer support satisfactory once understood.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with One Identity Active Roles in comparison to Imanami GroupID?

One Identity Active Roles users find the setup cost reasonable with good ROI over time. Imanami GroupID users feel its pricing justifies its features and report solid ROI as well.

To learn more, read our detailed Imanami GroupID vs. One Identity Active Roles Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Imanami GroupID vs. One Identity Active Roles

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Imanami GroupID

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

13th

Ranking in Active Directory Management

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (35th)

One Identity Active Roles

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

3rd

Ranking in Active Directory Management

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Active Directory Management category, the mindshare of Imanami GroupID is 2.8%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Active Roles is 11.9%, up from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Active Directory Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Active Roles	11.9%
Imanami GroupID	2.8%
Other	85.3%

Active Directory Management

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Cauthorn

Identity and Access Management Manager at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement

I'd like to see it be able to do more than just groups. I'd like it to be able to do some things with email distribution lists as well. It can do that, but there were a few things that were limiting. It was difficult to get it set up, particularly with Azure in the cloud. I'd like that to be a little bit smoother. I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools. We've got a ton of groups, and it does take quite a while to do nightly processing. This is something that definitely needs improvement.

Read full review

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Executive at DigitalTrack Solutions Ind Pvt Ltd

Automation has transformed user lifecycle tasks and now enforces consistent secure access

While One Identity Active Roles is a strong platform, a few improvements would make it even better. Many users feel the user interface is not very modern or intuitive, and it can take time to get used to navigating the console and workflows. Another improvement area is the learning curve and setup complexity. One Identity Active Roles is very powerful, but initial configuration, especially for policies, workflows, and delegation, can be complex and require experienced resources. From an integration perspective, although it supports multiple systems, organizations would benefit from more out-of-the-box connectors and smoother cloud integrations such as Azure Active Directory and software-as-a-service applications, as some setups currently require customization. In terms of reporting, while auditing is strong, generating business-friendly reports can be challenging. Users have mentioned the need for better dashboards and easier report generation. There are also some performance considerations, especially in large environments, such as slower PowerShell execution or delays in dynamic group processing in certain cases. Overall, improvements in user interface, ease of use, integration, reporting, and performance optimization would significantly enhance the product experience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system, and based on that job code, we use the query tool so that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should, which runs every night so that the next day everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."

"I have found the overall features to be useful."

"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."

"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."

"There are a lot of other benefits that we take advantage of that are above and beyond the native Active Directory functions that Microsoft provides."

"One Identity Active Roles absolutely helps reduce identity-based breaches, making it very seamless for our user base to ensure that folks in specific positions have the least privileged access possible across our for-profit healthcare conglomerate with thirty states and over fifty community hospitals under a single Active Directory domain."

"One Identity Active Roles has had a very positive impact on the organization, especially in terms of efficiency, security, and compliance."

"We have seen a good return on investment because the automation feature has reduced manual efforts by around thirty to fifty percent and improved efficiency with reduced workload, saving our engineers time."

"The biggest thing for us is Active Roles saves a lot of man-hours in keeping groups up-to-date manually or trying to write some sort of script that you have to run, so we don't have to reinvent the wheel. Instead of when every time somebody joins a department, then somebody has to remember to put in a request to add "meet user Joe" to this group, the solution does it automatically for us. Therefore, it saves our business and IT staff time because they do not have to process requests since Active Role can do it for them."

"One Identity Active Roles is highly recommended because it is a good solution that is really helping our organization streamline the process and reduce manual errors or manual efforts while providing a good return on investment."

"Clear ROI has been seen with One Identity Active Roles, mainly through the time savings and reduced manual administration."

"Active Roles is easy to configure. It isn't a plug-and-play solution, and you need expertise to set it up. However, once you have your templates, it's easy to deploy in a highly decentralized environment. The custom configuration for our customers is fantastic, especially the web interface."

More One Identity Active Roles pros

Cons

"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."

"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."

"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky."

"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."

"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."

"I've had a difficult time getting it to cooperate with Azure in the cloud and, while the support staff are very good and very knowledgeable, what they assist with just on a call doesn't go deep enough to help with a number of issues. The answer that comes back is that we'd have to start an engagement with Professional Services, which is fine but that takes time to schedule and it takes budget."

"The third area for improvement, which is the weakest portion of ARS, is the workflow engine, which was introduced a few years ago. It's slow and not very intuitive to use, so I would like to see improvement there."

"A few improvements I would like to see in One Identity Active Roles are mainly around usability, reporting, and modern integration."

"The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially when designing workflows, policies, and delegation models."

"The ability to send logs to a SIEM would be very beneficial."

"One Identity Active Roles can be improved by simplifying the setup process since a small team in a small business requires implementation without extensive IT support."

"There is always room to improve the user interface for increased clarity. I believe enhancements to the console are also necessary because it is more confusing than the web interface."

"For the AAD management feature, it needs to improve the objects that we can manage and the security."

More One Identity Active Roles cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is on a yearly basis, and it has the product license fee and the support for it. So, there is the licensing fee, and there is the annual maintenance that includes the support. I don't remember exactly, but we're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of $20,000 to $30,000 for it per year. We've got a pretty large implementation of it, and for the amount that we do, it is a pretty good deal. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"The pricing is high. I have not been involved with the renewal or cost aspect, but I know it is not cheap by any means. However, it is very useful for our environment."

"The licensing model is a simple user-based model, not that much complicated."

"The price is reasonable. It costs us about 1 million Danish kroner annually, and we also spend about half as much on consultants."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"It's fairly priced."

"It's expensive."

"The pricing for Active Roles is expensive but not as expensive as other solutions like Okta."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Active Directory Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

17%

Media Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	52
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	30

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Active Roles?

I had a great experience with the setup cost, pricing, and licensing costs because the sales team of the vendor is really helpful during the entire procurement of the solution, and we are grateful ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Active Roles?

I do not see anything that needs to be changed as of now concerning the organization's needs because it is working very well and it is providing great features with great processes. The initial set...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Active Roles?

When a new user is created, predefined rules automatically apply naming standards and assigned groups. This reduces manual tasks while ensuring consistency across all operations. It prevents and av...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 18% of the time

e-trust Horacius vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 12% of the time

OneLogin vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 11% of the time

Netwrix Auditor vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 10% of the time

Softerra Adaxes vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 8% of the time

More Imanami GroupID Competitors

ManageEngine ADManager Plus vs One Identity Active Roles

Compared 13% of the time

Netwrix Auditor vs One Identity Active Roles

Compared 9% of the time

Active Administrator vs One Identity Active Roles

Compared 8% of the time

One Identity Manager vs One Identity Active Roles

Compared 7% of the time

More One Identity Active Roles Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Provisioning Software

April 2026

Download Imanami GroupID product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Active Roles

April 2026

Download One Identity Active Roles product report

Also Known As

No data available

Quest Active Roles

Overview

Imanami GroupID offers a sophisticated group management and automation solution, streamlining user provisioning and access control. Designed for IT professionals, it enhances operational efficiency and security.

Imanami GroupID specializes in providing automated solutions for group management challenges faced by IT departments. By simplifying access control, it ensures that users have the necessary permissions while preventing unauthorized access. Automated provisioning and dynamic management of Active Directory groups help maintain security and compliance. Integration capabilities with existing systems further amplify its functionality.

What are the standout features of Imanami GroupID?

Dynamic Group Management: Automates group membership based on set policies, ensuring accurate access permissions.
Automated Provisioning: Simplifies user account creation and rights assignment, reducing administrative burden.
Self-Service Portal: Allows users to manage memberships, reducing IT department dependence for minor changes.
Audit and Compliance: Provides reporting tools to track changes and maintain regulatory adherence.
Integration Support: Compatible with systems like LDAP and various identity platforms for seamless operation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Imanami GroupID?

Enhanced Security: Automating access controls minimizes unauthorized access, safeguarding data.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks, freeing IT resources for strategic initiatives.
Cost Savings: Lower administrative costs through automation and better resource utilization.
Compliance Assurance: Automated audit trails ensure compliance with industry regulations.
User Empowerment: Self-service capabilities improve user satisfaction and productivity.

Industries with strict access control requirements, such as finance and healthcare, often deploy Imanami GroupID to enforce security protocols effectively. Educational institutions use it to manage faculty and student access to various resources efficiently. Its adaptability to different industry needs makes it a versatile choice for enhancing access management across sectors.

Imanami

One Identity Active Roles enhances Active Directory management by automating essential tasks and improving security through efficient delegation and role-based access control.

One Identity Active Roles offers advanced features for managing Active Directory environments, aiding in automating user provisioning, group management, and de-provisioning. It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft environments and provides centralized management for both on-premises and cloud identities. By improving operational efficiency and reducing manual errors, it enforces robust governance across organizations. Active Roles includes auditing and reporting tools that strengthen compliance and security monitoring. Companies find the setup could be simplified with better documentation, more customization options in reporting, and expanded cloud integration, particularly with Azure. Improved workflows and deeper native connectors are needed for seamless automation. Price adjustments and user-friendly analytics with intuitive dashboards are recommended for better usability.

What are the key features of One Identity Active Roles?

Automation of Active Directory tasks: Streamlines processes such as user provisioning and de-provisioning.
Role-based access control: Ensures secure delegation of administration tasks.
Auditing and reporting: Enhances compliance with security monitoring capabilities.
Integration with Microsoft: Seamlessly manages on-premises and cloud identities.

What benefits and ROI should users evaluate?

Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual errors and streamlines active directory tasks.
Security and Governance: Enforces policy-based controls for secure user management.
Compliance: Strengthens monitoring and compliance through advanced auditing.
Usability: Suggests enhancements in workflow and analytics for better management.

Many industries deploy One Identity Active Roles for automating user lifecycle management, especially in Active Directory environments. It significantly eases operations by automating onboarding for new hires, managing role changes, and modifying access. The platform efficiently handles tasks like password resets and compliance audits while empowering teams to securely manage user access without requiring full administrative rights.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Grant Thornton LLP

City of Frankfurt, Moore Public Schools, George Washington University, Transavia Airlines, Howard County, MD. See all stories at OneIdentity.com/casestudies

Buyer's Guide

Imanami GroupID vs. One Identity Active Roles

April 2026

Free Report: Imanami GroupID vs. One Identity Active Roles

Find out what your peers are saying about Imanami GroupID vs. One Identity Active Roles and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Imanami GroupID vs. One Identity Active Roles report.

See our list of best Active Directory Management vendors and best User Provisioning Software vendors.

We monitor all Active Directory Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.