Field Effect MDR vs Upwind comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Field Effect and Upwind Security are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Field Effect is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.3, while Upwind Security is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.5. Field Effect holds a 1.4% mindshare in MDR, compared to Upwind Security’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Field Effect users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Upwind Security users who would recommend it.

Field Effect MDR

Read 31 Field Effect MDR reviews

4,528 Views
4,483 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Upwind

Read 5 Upwind reviews

7,445 Views
74 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Field Effect MDR

Upwind

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Field Effect MDR and Upwind based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Field Effect MDR vs. Upwind Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. Upwind

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Field Effect MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Upwind

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

28th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (40th), Container Security (27th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (20th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (18th), API Security (12th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (25th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (16th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (28th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (13th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (18th), Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) (8th), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (7th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (14th), AI Security (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 1.4%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Upwind is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Field Effect MDR	1.4%
Upwind	0.1%
Other	98.5%

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2753850

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Customer security is enhanced with software and update detection while licensing process needs improvement

A quick specific example of how I use Field Effect MDR to keep my customers secure is that it helps me identify computers that need updates, even when I believe they are already updated. Field Effect MDR finds software and Windows updates that aren't being completed, which I find very valuable.

Read full review

Mohammed Mudasser

AI/ML Engineer at a educational organization with 5,001-10,000 employees

Runtime context has transformed how we prioritize exploitable cloud risks and protect workloads

I appreciate runtime context, which helps connect vulnerabilities and misconfigurations with actual workload behavior and network relationships, making it easier to prioritize remediation based on real exposure rather than simply working through a long list of security findings. The best features that stand out to me are contextual vulnerability prioritization, cloud workload visibility, and runtime security. I especially value how Upwind connects vulnerabilities with actual runtime behavior, which helps focus on exploitable risk rather than working through a long list of findings. It has helped us focus on actual exploitable risk instead of treating every vulnerability equally. By considering runtime activity, exposure, reachability, and sensitive data context, the team can prioritize remediation much faster and reduce unnecessary alert noise. I also value the runtime visibility and attack path context because it connects security findings with network behavior and actual workload. This makes investigations more actionable and helps the team move from simply detecting issues to understanding their real impact. The biggest positive impact has been the prioritization of cloud security risk and improved visibility. Instead of chasing every vulnerability, we can focus on issues that are actually exposed or active at runtime, which makes the security team more efficient and remediation more targeted.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A quick specific example of how I use Field Effect MDR to keep my customers secure is that it helps me identify computers that need updates, even when I believe they are already updated."

"We are getting visibility over the network, not just for those hosts that have a Field Effect EDR agent but also things like the Internet of Things, guest networks, or rogue devices. We definitely have visibility into all network traffic, which is very cool."

"The alerts that we get are valuable. It notifies us if there is any attempted access and if there are any areas where we need to create more security for clients. It is stopping anything from happening before there is even an issue."

"Hackers are trying to breach a business when they least expect it - that's often at night, weekends, and holidays. Covalence never sleeps or misses a second of monitoring."

"Direct and easy and quick communication to the Field Effect cybersecurity team experts has led to quick resolution of any problems or alerts."

"The most valuable features are AROs, which provide timely notifications for out-of-compliance or out-of-specification detections."

"Covalence's cloud protection element has been excellent. A lot of organizations are using 365. It's hard to find a secure solution for protecting accounts. We've gone down the path of trying to utilize other security solutions for that particular area. We've been disappointed and always come back to trying to implement Covalence when we can so we know people are safe."

"It is easy to manage surveillance."

More Field Effect MDR pros

"My advice for others looking into using Upwind is that if you are seeking a strong CNAPP with an advanced runtime and strong CDR capabilities, this is the product."

"They are a great overall cloud security platform and they continue innovating and adding new features."

"The combination of runtime visibility, security insights, and contextual risk prioritization makes it much easier to focus on the risks that actually matter."

"Upwind has positively impacted my organization by reducing time to action and time to response by half."

"Now, thanks to Upwind, everything is automated and I am saving around six hours per week since switching to Upwind."

Cons

"The area where they can make it better is by giving responses to the end-user. For example, when there is an alert to the administrator, I get it. I have to copy and paste everything to everyone... And then I have to follow up with them, and it's a real pain."

"I'd love the price to be a little bit less."

"Field Effect Covalence could benefit from enhancing its packing slip process."

"They could use more third-party integrations with other MSP tools."

"I'd like improved visibility into the backend data where logs are stored, along with integrations with a wider range of products."

"It would be incredibly valuable to have the Field Effect team handle some of the third-party application patching they're currently identifying."

"I have had a couple of challenges around updates to the agents where it seems it doesn't automatically replace older versions."

"Field Effect MDR could broaden its cloud application integrations to integrate better with Office 365, Azure, Salesforce, etc. They integrate about 15 to 20 out of the box. I'd love to see a lot more than that."

More Field Effect MDR cons

"Upwind can be improved because its UI is a bit difficult to navigate."

"I believe the user interface can use improvement because some features are quite tricky to find since they are not where you would expect them to be, but with enough time, you are able to find them."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We're currently enrolled in the volume package, which offers tiered pricing based on usage."

"The licensing model itself is solid, but we're ironing out some inconsistencies in how customer profiles are configured."

"The cost of the solution is high."

"The pricing is comparable to what else is out there."

"Field Effect Covalence's pricing is just right."

"While Field Effect Covalence's pricing seems competitive for the market, the biggest hurdle lies in the lack of dedicated security budgets within many organizations."

"Although Covalence is expensive, it provides good value for the price."

"It is on the high end, but it is worth it for the service that you get from them."

More Field Effect MDR pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	3

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?

Pricing was initially a concern, but the recent updates have resolved that by offering a more accessible buying cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?

One way Field Effect MDR can be improved is through its licensing process, which is not ideal. The licensing process is difficult because I have to access a separate website to complete it.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Field Effect Covalence?

My main use case for Field Effect MDR is keeping my customers secure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Upwind?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing process were pretty reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Upwind?

I would appreciate more customizable dashboards and reporting for different teams, such as security operations, engineering, and leadership. The runtime context is excellent, but tailoring those vi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Upwind?

My main use case for Upwind is cloud security and workload protection. I primarily use it to gain visibility into cloud assets, vulnerabilities, and runtime risks, and I mainly use it to prioritize...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 9% of the time

LevelBlue Managed Detection and Response vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 9% of the time

Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 6% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 6% of the time

More Field Effect MDR Competitors

Wiz vs Upwind

Compared 17% of the time

Orca Security vs Upwind

Compared 11% of the time

Sweet Security vs Upwind

Compared 7% of the time

Salt Security vs Upwind

Compared 4% of the time

Sysdig Secure vs Upwind

Compared 4% of the time

More Upwind Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR

November 2026

Download Field Effect MDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Upwind

October 2026

Download Upwind product report

Also Known As

Field Effect Covalence

Upwind Security Upwind Platform for AWS Security Hub, Upwind Security Upwind for AWS Security Hub Extended

Overview

Field Effect delivers intelligence-grade managed detection and response for the AI era.

Built on Federated Smart Compute™ and nation-state tradecraft, our holistic MDR platform uncovers weaknesses early, blocks attacks in real time, and reduces risk across the entire threat surface—endpoint, network, cloud, and more.

With an 18-second median time to detect, Field Effect helps MSPs and overwhelmed IT teams outpace agentic attacks and achieve premium protection with the team they have.

Field Effect

Upwind is a comprehensive tool designed to optimize wind energy management for industry specialists. Streamlining processes and enhancing operational efficiency, it provides actionable insights and innovative features critical for achieving energy objectives.

The primary focus of Upwind is to provide a robust platform that fosters operational advancements in wind energy management. With its cutting-edge technology, Upwind is poised to deliver precise analytics and predictive maintenance capabilities. Its integration into existing infrastructures helps enhance the delivery of renewable energy, thereby facilitating a seamless transition towards more sustainable practices. Leveraging these capabilities, businesses can significantly augment their energy output while simultaneously reducing costs.

What are the most important features of Upwind?

Analytics Dashboard: Offers insightful data visualization for making informed decisions.
Predictive Maintenance: Proactively identifies potential issues to minimize downtime.
Real-time Monitoring: Ensures ongoing performance tracking for immediate action.
Scalability: Integrates easily with growing operations to enhance capability.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Costs: Efficiently manages resources to lower operational expenditure.
Increased Efficiency: Optimizes energy production strategies for better yield.
Improved Reliability: Consistent monitoring contributes to long-term operational stability.
Enhanced Insights: Provides critical data analytics to drive strategic decisions.

In the wind energy sector, implementing Upwind is directly aligned with industry goals of sustainability and economic growth. Whether integrated into large-scale wind farms or smaller localized projects, it adapts to diverse scenarios, ensuring alignment with industry-specific demands like regulatory compliance and technological advancements.

Upwind Security

Sample Customers

Field Effect MDR is widely adopted by managed service providers (MSPs) and organizations with lean IT teams. It is used to monitor, detect, and respond to threats across distributed environments, helping businesses strengthen their cybersecurity posture while maintaining operational efficiency. Organizations rely on Field Effect MDR to protect hybrid infrastructures, secure cloud applications, and defend against modern threats, including increasingly automated and AI-driven attacks, while maintaining compliance and resilience in a rapidly evolving threat landscape.

StockX, Yotpo, bill, Digital Turbine, nanit, CallRail, boomi

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. Upwind

October 2026

Free Report: Field Effect MDR vs. Upwind

Find out what your peers are saying about Field Effect MDR vs. Upwind and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Field Effect MDR vs. Upwind report.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.