No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft UAG [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
The compared F5 and Microsoft solutions aren't in the same category. F5 is ranked #1 in ADC , with an average rating of 9.2, and holds a 11.9% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 83% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...
Read 124 F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) reviews
  • 12,919 Views
  • 8,656 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
Microsoft UAG [EOL]
Read 7 Microsoft UAG [EOL] reviews
    83% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and Microsoft UAG [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, NetScaler and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC).

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: September 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    September 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.8
    Number of Reviews
    124
    Ranking in other categories
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (1st)
    Microsoft UAG [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Number of Reviews
    7
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    edshyaa - PeerSpot reviewer
    edshyaa
    Network Engineer at Stryker
    Load balancing has improved traffic distribution and currently supports high availability upgrades
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) offers effective load balancing methods that help distribute traffic across our servers, whether we have two or several. This load balancing feature stands out as it is the fundamental work we do with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). While I recognize there are many features, such as iRules, which I have not explored yet, we primarily work on VIPs, pool members, and traffic distribution. The load balancing algorithms' flexibility makes them very useful for our team, enabling us to choose different servers and manage load effectively. We use various methods based on user or application requirements, making the algorithms set up by F5 in the backend quite helpful. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) positively impacts our organization primarily through its load balancing capabilities. We avoid traffic overload on individual servers by placing backend servers behind F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) VIP. This load balancing helps us manage traffic effectively. Since the configuration of the I-series, we have had smooth performance, and with the recent migration to the R-series, it is working faster than before, providing positive outcomes for our operations. Since moving to the R-series, I notice improved performance; it is user-friendly and handles traffic efficiently. The upgrading process is different as we create tenants and a main host. R-series has better CPU and memory, leading to higher throughput with minimal downtime, making it a significant improvement over the I-series.
    Read full review
    it_user3483 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user3483
    Senior Consultant at Unify Square
    Forefront Unified Access Gateway delivers anywhere access to corporate resources in secure and highly customizable ways
    *Review updated on April 17, 2014 As you can read on the Microsoft TechNet blog ( http://bit.ly/J2Jcni ) UAG has entered the final part of its lifecycle. "Mainstream support will continue through April 14, 2015, and extended support will continue through April 14, 2020." The features you used in…
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "For our internal use we went with F5 because it's the best tool."
    "It is a stable product but sometimes we have some issues."
    "Our experience has been very good, in terms of performance, and securing our application infrastructure."
    "The scalability of the solution depends on the sizing of the network. Generally, the scalability is quite good."
    "It is stable."
    "F5 delivers a full range of solutions that simplify service providers’ security architectures while mitigating threats."
    "The product is quite flexible."
    "Over our year of engagement with F5, we evaluated multiple products from other vendors and competed with many others, and we always found F5 products to be our first and best choice to advise our customers to use, with respect to: Performance, protection, stability, scalability."
    More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) pros
    "We were able to setup an SSTP VNP, application access portal and desktop access from one gateway."
    "Our remote users can securely logon to our corporate network (Copnet) from any part of the world without compromising the integrity of the corporate resources."
    "The capability of employees to work from anywhere in the world on the corporate network only a laptop with an internet connection and correct username/password are enough to be connected"
    "UAG is an affordable software solution available in the market."
    "UAG makes it easier for organizations to deliver secure remote access to their applications and resources, and improve employee and partner productivity."
     

    Cons

    "The price needs improvement as it is quite costly."
    "There is a challenge in Pakistan. This is when there is a hardware failure. Sometimes, it takes more time to get a replacement because it is sent out from the U.S. or some other regional outpost. Thus, it takes two to three days to receive a replacement."
    "Logging is a bit of a problem. Logging and monitoring are only in plain text."
    "For example, if you have an E 2000 or I 4000, you might have a lot of traffic and the device cannot handle it very well."
    "There is a challenge in Pakistan. This is when there is a hardware failure."
    "The SharePoint SSO part has some room for improvement. Opening documents and spreadsheets on local applications in on our specific situation is not possible."
    "Improvements should enable customers to build a tailor-made solution in the future through a service portal."
    "If one virtual portion is unavailable, it can cause issues."
    More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) cons
    "Though UAG is a breakthrough in SSL VPN, it still lags in some fronts, like authentication control process in VPN."
    "UAG: once above 50 users it was hardly able to work"
    "Trunks are slightly difficult to configure."
    "You cannot implement UAG on a single server. This makes it not ideal for small businesses."
    "Cross site single sign-on, not working between two UAG servers."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "The cost is high for this product, so it's not suitable for small customers, e.g. those with small environments."
    "I am not aware of the exact cost of the product. However, it is expensive."
    "BIG-IP LTM isn't a cheap solution - I'd rate its pricing as three out of five."
    "The price of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is too high."
    "This is a high-priced tool. We pay for its license yearly."
    "Compared to using open-source products, the prices are not cheap."
    "Unless the price difference is large, this is not the primary concern for the product. The performance and product-related issues (secure for VPN, multi-function for network device, etc.) are the keys."
    "It's fair, it's not too expensive. Maybe just a little high."
    More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) pricing and cost advice
    Information not available
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    14%
    Outsourcing Company
    13%
    Construction Company
    7%
    Manufacturing Company
    7%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business62
    Midsize Enterprise32
    Large Enterprise86
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business3
    Midsize Enterprise1
    Large Enterprise3
     

    Questions from the Community

    What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP?
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) could improve file upload speeds when opening cases and attaching files; sometimes, downloading files like QKView takes time, depending on size. I expect faste...
    See all answers
    What is your primary use case for F5 BIG-IP?
    My main use case for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is placing our applications on F5 and the backend servers on the pool. We also regularly renew SSL certificates before they expire, usuall...
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)?
    The product is costly. I would rate the price a five out of ten.
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Fortinet FortiADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    Fortinet FortiADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 9% of the time
    NetScaler vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    NetScaler vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 6% of the time
    HAProxy vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    HAProxy vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 6% of the time
    A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 5% of the time
    NGINX Plus vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    NGINX Plus vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 5% of the time
    More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Competitors
    Symantec VIP Access Manager vs Microsoft UAG [EOL] Logo
    Symantec VIP Access Manager vs Microsoft UAG [EOL]
    Compared 33% of the time
    Ivanti Connect Secure vs Microsoft UAG [EOL] Logo
    Ivanti Connect Secure vs Microsoft UAG [EOL]
    Compared 26% of the time
    More Microsoft UAG [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    September 2026
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) reportDownload F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) product report
    Buyer's Guide
    SSL VPN
    August 2026
    Microsoft UAG [EOL] reportDownload Microsoft UAG [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    F5 BIG-IP, BIG-IP LTM, F5 ASM, Viprion, F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition , Crescendo Networks Application Delivery Controller, BIG IP
    UAG, MS UAG [EOL]
     

    Overview

    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) specializes in load balancing, iRules, and application security. It provides flexibility and stability, supporting SSL offloading and enhancing application performance and reliability with low downtime.

    F5 BIG-IP LTM is designed for efficient traffic management and security. Its intuitive interface allows users to customize traffic through iRules and ensures stable application delivery. Its performance stability and ability to inspect TLS traffic, along with web application firewall features, make it preferred for consistent application delivery. While praised for its capabilities, users note its challenges with complex configuration and management. Calls for streamlined processes, training, support, better logging, and cloud integration highlight areas for improvement.

    What are the key features of F5 BIG-IP LTM?
    • Load Balancing: Distributes HTTP and HTTPS traffic to ensure high availability.
    • iRules: Allows for customized traffic management.
    • Application Security: Includes TLS inspection and web application firewall capabilities.
    • SSL Offloading: Reduces server load by handling SSL processing.
    What benefits and ROI should users expect?
    • Performance Stability: Ensures high reliability and less downtime.
    • Flexibility: Offers customizable traffic management through iRules.
    • Security: Provides strong protection against application attacks.
    • Network Management Efficiency: Simplifies traffic distribution and infrastructure management.

    F5 BIG-IP LTM is widely used in industries requiring robust application delivery and security, such as finance and healthcare. It supports load balancing and traffic management across different environments and acts as a reverse proxy, helping companies secure their infrastructure against cyber threats while facilitating high availability and scalability.

    F5
    Forefront Unified Access Gateway (UAG) provides remote client endpoints with access to corporate applications, networks, and internal resources via a Web portal or site. Forefront UAG product documentation is organized into content categories. Use the topics in each category to help you design, plan, deploy, and administer your Forefront UAG servers.
    Microsoft
     

    Sample Customers

    Riken, TransUnion, Tepco Systems Administration, Daejeon University, G&T Bank, Danamon, CyberAgent Inc.
    Topocart, AAG, GeoAir, Blue Skies Consulting, Hiparc Geotecnologia, Peace Map
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    September 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, NetScaler and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: September 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.