We performed a comparison between ExtremeControl and Fortinet FortiNAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."There is information on migrating most of the cloud system's features."
"The company also uses Cisco ISE in other places. I have been told that ExtremeControl is easier to use than ISE. The other reason we prefer ExtremeControl is stability. That's why they chose it for this big hospital in Oslo."
"I can know which end users are using which features."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Fortinet FortiNAC offers several valuable features, including data security, 99 percent uptime with VPN connections, MAC filtering, and traffic prioritization."
"Fortinet FortiNAC is a stable solution."
"The solution is good at giving a deep dive into each product. It tells you, for example, what is connected to the network. It gives us good reporting tools."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiNAC is compliance, which we can do with the clients and the endpoints on the network."
"When it works, it's great. It keeps things off the network which are supposed to be off the network."
"The features are more expandable."
"Version 9.1 has been an improvement on previous versions. It's a good solution for SMB."
"All the features of Fortinet FortiNAC are valuable."
"I'd like to have access to more information on the traffic passing through."
"The installation is easy, it can take between five minutes to four hours depending on the complexity of the environment. The speed of the installation could improve for more complex environments."
"There isn't enough development for the on-premises controller."
"Keeping the hard disk on the one series will be easier for the distributor and will keep the prices lower for the customer."
"The response and resolution time for technical support issues need to be improved."
"The course content could be improved, it's not that simple to work through."
"The solution's licensing price should be improved."
"FortiNAC could be more scalable."
"For our organization and our clients, the price is the main concern. They should work to make it more competitive."
"Fortinet's local support could be improved."
"I hope that Fortinet can add a feature with a remediation mechanism when you find a broken piece so that you can click on something and download the needed update or resolve the firewall issue more easily. Currently, we have to use an external remediation server to download updates."
ExtremeControl is ranked 11th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 4 reviews while Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 3rd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 43 reviews. ExtremeControl is rated 8.2, while Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ExtremeControl writes "It costs less than comparable solutions, and it's highly stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". ExtremeControl is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Forescout Platform, whereas Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Sophos Network Access Control.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.