Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs ScienceLogic comparison

ExtraHop Networks and ScienceLogic are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #72, while ScienceLogic is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.6. ExtraHop Networks holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to ScienceLogic’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ScienceLogic users who would recommend it.
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...
Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews
  • 1,247 Views
  • 898 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
ScienceLogic
Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews
  • 3,857 Views
  • 1,813 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and ExtraHop Reveal(x) compete in IT operations management. ScienceLogic has an advantage in pricing and customer support, whereas ExtraHop Reveal(x) stands out with its comprehensive features that justify higher costs.

Features: ScienceLogic enhances monitoring and automation, integrating seamlessly with diverse IT environments. It offers straightforward automation tools, effective IT environment integration, and reliable performance tracking. ExtraHop Reveal(x) excels in network traffic analysis, real-time anomaly detection, and security insights, ensuring a secure IT infrastructure with its real-time monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could benefit from enhancing network analysis capabilities, improving real-time anomaly detection, and providing more advanced security features. ExtraHop Reveal(x) might improve by simplifying its automation processes, offering a more streamlined integration experience, and presenting a more straightforward pricing model.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides an easier deployment with comprehensive support resources, facilitating a hassle-free implementation process. ExtraHop Reveal(x) may require more initial effort due to its complex deployment model, yet it offers efficient and responsive customer service, which aids users during the setup and operation.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers a cost-effective initial setup with a clear ROI path attributed to low initial costs and a straightforward pricing model. ExtraHop Reveal(x) incurs higher upfront costs, but delivers ROI through advanced features that make the investment worthwhile over time, positioning itself as a premium solution with strong long-term returns.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
72nd
Ranking in IT Operations Analytics
14th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Diagnostics (12th), Network Packet Capture (8th)
ScienceLogic
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
26th
Ranking in IT Operations Analytics
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (18th), Cloud Monitoring Software (15th), AIOps (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.2%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ScienceLogic1.2%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations0.6%
Other98.2%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Out West - PeerSpot reviewer
Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations
We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.
Read full review
Michael Wenn - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has."
"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."
"The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."
"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."
"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."
"Wire data analytics."
"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."
"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."
"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."
"It is simple."
"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."
"A major benefit is eliminating visibility gaps, which motivates me to consolidate tools."
"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."
"Power packs."
More ScienceLogic pros
 

Cons

"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."
"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."
"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services."
"Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."
"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."
"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."
"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."
"There are often bugs in new releases."
"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."
"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."
"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."
"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."
More ScienceLogic cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."
"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."
"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."
"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."
"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."
"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."
"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."
"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."
"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."
"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."
"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."
More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
13%
Healthcare Company
9%
Educational Organization
7%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise24
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about ScienceLogic?
The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?
I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 32% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 17% of the time
ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 12% of the time
Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 11% of the time
ThousandEyes vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
ThousandEyes vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 11% of the time
More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors
Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic Logo
Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic
Compared 13% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic
Compared 11% of the time
Zabbix vs ScienceLogic Logo
Zabbix vs ScienceLogic
Compared 9% of the time
LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic Logo
LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic
Compared 7% of the time
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs ScienceLogic Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs ScienceLogic
Compared 6% of the time
More ScienceLogic Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
October 2025
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reportDownload ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report
Buyer's Guide
ScienceLogic
September 2025
ScienceLogic reportDownload ScienceLogic product report
 

Overview

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

ExtraHop Networks

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?
  • Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
  • PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
  • Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
  • Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
  • Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
  • Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
  • Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
  • Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic
 

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System
Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell
Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic
September 2025
Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic
Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.