ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs ScienceLogic comparison

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

4,294 Views
2,104 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and ExtraHop Reveal(x) compete in IT operations management. ScienceLogic has an advantage in pricing and customer support, whereas ExtraHop Reveal(x) stands out with its comprehensive features that justify higher costs.

Features: ScienceLogic enhances monitoring and automation, integrating seamlessly with diverse IT environments. It offers straightforward automation tools, effective IT environment integration, and reliable performance tracking. ExtraHop Reveal(x) excels in network traffic analysis, real-time anomaly detection, and security insights, ensuring a secure IT infrastructure with its real-time monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could benefit from enhancing network analysis capabilities, improving real-time anomaly detection, and providing more advanced security features. ExtraHop Reveal(x) might improve by simplifying its automation processes, offering a more streamlined integration experience, and presenting a more straightforward pricing model.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides an easier deployment with comprehensive support resources, facilitating a hassle-free implementation process. ExtraHop Reveal(x) may require more initial effort due to its complex deployment model, yet it offers efficient and responsive customer service, which aids users during the setup and operation.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers a cost-effective initial setup with a clear ROI path attributed to low initial costs and a straightforward pricing model. ExtraHop Reveal(x) incurs higher upfront costs, but delivers ROI through advanced features that make the investment worthwhile over time, positioning itself as a premium solution with strong long-term returns.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: January 2026).

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

74th

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Diagnostics (11th), Network Packet Capture (6th)

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

16th

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (10th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th), AIOps (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ScienceLogic	1.1%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations	0.6%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Out West

Project Manager and IT Management Consultant at a integrator with 1,001-5,000 employees

Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations

We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."

"The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."

"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."

"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."

"Wire data analytics."

"There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has."

"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."

"The integration of ScienceLogic with our existing IT ecosystems has significantly benefited our organization, as all alerts now directly go to IBM Netcool and then to the ITSM tool, ServiceNow."

"Power packs."

"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."

"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."

"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."

"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services."

"Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."

"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."

"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."

"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."

"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."

"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 15% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 7% of the time

Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 7% of the time

ThousandEyes vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 6% of the time

ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 6% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Overview

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

ExtraHop Networks

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic