ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs ScienceLogic comparison

ExtraHop Networks and ScienceLogic are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #74, while ScienceLogic is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.7. ExtraHop Networks holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to ScienceLogic’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ScienceLogic users who would recommend it.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews

1,173 Views
868 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

4,067 Views
1,952 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

ScienceLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and ExtraHop Reveal(x) compete in IT operations management. ScienceLogic has an advantage in pricing and customer support, whereas ExtraHop Reveal(x) stands out with its comprehensive features that justify higher costs.

Features: ScienceLogic enhances monitoring and automation, integrating seamlessly with diverse IT environments. It offers straightforward automation tools, effective IT environment integration, and reliable performance tracking. ExtraHop Reveal(x) excels in network traffic analysis, real-time anomaly detection, and security insights, ensuring a secure IT infrastructure with its real-time monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could benefit from enhancing network analysis capabilities, improving real-time anomaly detection, and providing more advanced security features. ExtraHop Reveal(x) might improve by simplifying its automation processes, offering a more streamlined integration experience, and presenting a more straightforward pricing model.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides an easier deployment with comprehensive support resources, facilitating a hassle-free implementation process. ExtraHop Reveal(x) may require more initial effort due to its complex deployment model, yet it offers efficient and responsive customer service, which aids users during the setup and operation.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers a cost-effective initial setup with a clear ROI path attributed to low initial costs and a straightforward pricing model. ExtraHop Reveal(x) incurs higher upfront costs, but delivers ROI through advanced features that make the investment worthwhile over time, positioning itself as a premium solution with strong long-term returns.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

74th

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Diagnostics (13th), Network Packet Capture (8th)

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

25th

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (20th), Cloud Monitoring Software (16th), AIOps (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Out West

Project Manager and IT Management Consultant at a integrator with 1,001-5,000 employees

Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations

We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has."

"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."

"Wire data analytics."

"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."

"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."

"The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."

"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."

"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"Power packs."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."

"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."

"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."

"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services."

"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."

"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."

"They need a little more self-service."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."

"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."

"The product is not user-friendly."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."

"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."

"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 18% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 13% of the time

ThousandEyes vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 9% of the time

ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 9% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

August 2025

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations report

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

July 2025

Download ScienceLogic product report

Overview

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

ExtraHop Networks

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

ScienceLogic

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic

August 2025

Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.