ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

ExtraHop Networks and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #71, while Kaseya is ranked #77. ExtraHop Networks holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews

3,829 Views
2,604 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

2,609 Views
2,192 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ExtraHop Reveal(x) and Kaseya Traverse compete in the network monitoring category. Reveal(x) has an upper hand in real-time data analysis, while Traverse excels in performance monitoring and comprehensive infrastructure management.

Features:Reveal(x) provides actionable insights through behavioral analytics, emphasizing real-time threat detection and response. It focuses on enhancing security with advanced tracking of incoming and outgoing data streams. Traverse offers extensive infrastructure monitoring, giving a holistic view of network health and utilizing predictive analytics for efficient IT management. It specializes in performance monitoring, ensuring seamless operation and minimal downtime.

Room for Improvement:Reveal(x) could enhance its infrastructure management capabilities, offering a more diverse range of monitoring features. It might benefit from improving its user interface to enhance usability. More budget-friendly pricing options could make it accessible to smaller businesses. Traverse requires streamlining its deployment process for quicker installation. Additional user-friendly reporting tools could improve analysis capabilities. Integrating more security features would provide a balanced approach alongside its performance focus.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Reveal(x) is known for rapid deployment and robust support, efficiently catering to large enterprises. Its support system facilitates swift problem resolution. Traverse requires more time for deployment due to its comprehensive nature but compensates with solid customer service and extensive resources, ensuring smoother adoption over time.

Pricing and ROI:Reveal(x) generally involves higher initial costs due to its advanced real-time capabilities and security focus, offering substantial ROI through enhanced protection and reduced risk. Traverse presents a more budget-friendly option with steady ROI, driven by effective performance monitoring and IT infrastructure maintenance. Reveal(x) provides high ROI for security-focused investments, whereas Traverse aligns with cost-driven, performance-focused strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Kaseya Traverse

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

71st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Diagnostics (10th), IT Operations Analytics (13th), Network Packet Capture (6th)

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

77th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (52nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations	0.7%
Kaseya Traverse	0.6%
Other	98.7%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Out West

Project Manager and IT Management Consultant at a integrator with 1,001-5,000 employees

Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations

We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You cannot hide from the wire; all truth lives in the packets, and ExtraHop gets them to talk!"

"It gives you full 360-degree visibility into your entire infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."

"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."

"ExtraHop is far ahead of anything comparable in the industry."

"It's a must-have solution for large IT Operations, providing the ability to analyze infrastructure and application-related performance and data from the wire perspective."

"This is a must-try product."

"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations pros

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"In terms of most valuable features, we are happy with everything so far, and maybe in a year's time I'll have a different opinion on what can change, what can be better, but for now it's the perfect solution."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."

"The improvement that would make the most impact would be expanding on the new EXA big data back end."

"The solution could get more aggressive in the discounting of the overall cost."

"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services."

"We've had some struggles getting it to see everything that we want to see. Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."

"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."

"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."

"There is room for improvement in the security part. They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations cons

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully assess what it has."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"With my most recent experiences on the solution, I can say that it isn't currently stable; there are a lot of glitches and bugs and the reliability just isn't there right now."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."

"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."

"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Government

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaseya Traverse?

If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kaseya Traverse?

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. As Kaseya sellers, we always promote Kaseya first. If the price is more competitive, then I think it will be better. It's a main pain point for us as a resel...

See all answers

Comparisons

ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 5% of the time

gen-E vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 5% of the time

Glassbeam vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 4% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 10% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 4% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 4% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

August 2026

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations report

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

August 2026

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Overview

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations leverages wire data analytics to provide valuable insights across all network layers. Offering auto-discovery, live PCAP analysis, and customizable dashboards, it empowers IT teams with enhanced application analysis and security detections.

Focusing on wire data analytics from Layer 2 to Layer 7, ExtraHop Reveal(x) delivers application analysis, security anomaly monitoring, and real-time traffic analysis. With plug-and-play deployment and minimal administration, it facilitates seamless integration. Users benefit from its comprehensive network performance evaluation, insightful network topology mapping, and capabilities like auto-discovery. Despite room for enhancement in industry-specific solutions, visualizations, and security features, its extensive programmability supports diverse IT operations needs. It is perfect for monitoring enterprise applications and ensuring efficient network security and operations.

What are the key features of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations?

Wire Data Analytics: Analyzes data from Layer 2 to 7 for comprehensive insights into network performance.
Application Analysis: Offers deep analysis of applications to optimize performance and resolve issues quickly.
Security Detections: Provides robust anomaly detection for enhanced network security.
Customizable Dashboards: Users can tailor dashboards for specific monitoring needs.
Plug-and-Play Deployment: Ensures easy setup and integration with existing infrastructure.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Network Performance Insights: Provides detailed insights to improve network efficiency and performance.
Real-Time Traffic Analysis: Enables quick response to network anomalies with real-time data.
Enhanced Security Monitoring: Strengthens security through comprehensive anomaly detection.
Efficient Problem Resolution: Facilitates identification of root causes for rapid issue resolution.
Reduced Administrative Overhead: Requires minimal administration with an easy-to-deploy configuration.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) is implemented in industries requiring detailed IT infrastructure monitoring, enterprise application tracking, and network security evaluation. It aids in identifying device misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and analyzing IT component interactions to ensure secure and efficient operations.

ExtraHop Networks

Kaseya Traverse offers sustainable functionality for comprehensive network, server, and application monitoring. It supports full IT stack visibility with strong processing capabilities and an intuitive interface.

Designed for businesses needing robust remote monitoring, Kaseya Traverse handles networks, servers, and applications with ease. It ensures comprehensive management with features like automated workflows, effective troubleshooting, remote support, and detailed inventory reporting. Despite user concerns about development speed in reporting and support, absence of a CMDB, and integration issues, it remains a popular choice for managed service providers. Utilized primarily for remote maintenance, patch updates, and antivirus management, it connects customer endpoints to manage infrastructure efficiently.

What are the key features of Kaseya Traverse?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports network, server, and application oversight.
Robust Processing: Manages multiple devices and infrastructures seamlessly.
Automation Workflows: Simplifies management tasks and improves efficiency.
Remote Support: Offers effective tools for troubleshooting and assistance.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures easy navigation and accessibility.

What benefits should users expect from Kaseya Traverse?

Increased Efficiency: Automation and remote capabilities streamline processes.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides a complete view of IT infrastructure.
Improved Troubleshooting: Quick identification and resolution of issues.
Cost Management: Despite pricing concerns, it supports competitive offerings.

Managed service providers leverage Kaseya Traverse for monitoring data centers and cloud environments across industries. It's particularly effective in networking, storage, and server management for enterprises, offering configuration assistance and link monitoring to optimize operations.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Kaseya Traverse

August 2026

Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.