Everpure FlashBlade vs Red Hat Gluster Storage comparison

Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) and Red Hat are both solutions in the Software Defined Storage (SDS) category. Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Red Hat is ranked #13 with an average rating of 10.0. Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) holds a 3.0% mindshare in SDS, compared to Red Hat’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Everpure FlashBlade

Read 41 Everpure FlashBlade reviews

9,566 Views
1,531 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Red Hat Gluster Storage

Read 4 Red Hat Gluster Storage reviews

1,655 Views
1,390 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Everpure FlashBlade

Red Hat Gluster Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2026

Everpure Storage FlashBlade and Red Hat Gluster Storage are data storage solutions with Everpure Storage FlashBlade providing a feature-rich, high ROI experience, while Red Hat Gluster Storage offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Everpure Storage FlashBlade features high performance, excellent scalability, and seamless technology integration, ensuring effective data protection and analytics. Red Hat Gluster Storage stands out with its open-source framework, flexibility, and adaptability for managing unstructured data across diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: Everpure Storage FlashBlade could benefit from enhancements in reducing setup complexity, providing more detailed user guidance, and diversifying deployment platforms. Red Hat Gluster Storage might improve by simplifying its deployment process, enhancing user interface intuitiveness, and offering more comprehensive technical support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Everpure Storage FlashBlade deploys efficiently with strong vendor support for rapid setup and troubleshooting. Red Hat Gluster Storage provides a flexible deployment model that supports various infrastructures, although it requires more technical expertise, supported by an open-source community.

Pricing and ROI: Everpure Storage FlashBlade, with its higher setup cost, delivers superior ROI due to robust performance and reliability. Red Hat Gluster Storage offers a budget-friendly initial cost, advantageous for cost-conscious organizations, with long-term savings potential through open-source adaptability and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Everpure FlashBlade vs. Red Hat Gluster Storage Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Everpure FlashBlade vs. Red Hat Gluster Storage

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Everpure FlashBlade

Ranking in Software Defined Storage (SDS)

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

All-Flash Storage (8th), File and Object Storage (4th)

Red Hat Gluster Storage

Ranking in Software Defined Storage (SDS)

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Software Defined Storage (SDS) category, the mindshare of Everpure FlashBlade is 3.0%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Gluster Storage is 2.7%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Defined Storage (SDS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Everpure FlashBlade	3.0%
Red Hat Gluster Storage	2.7%
Other	94.3%

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

Featured Reviews

MikaelHellström

IT Manager at Regin Dalarna

Has handled backup storage needs reliably and supports seamless upgrades

In environments requiring high throughput and low latency, Pure Storage FlashBlade provides high throughput and normal latency, but we do not have any application that requires low latency right now, so the latency of three to five milliseconds is considered kind of high. Pure Storage FlashBlade's ability to integrate with enterprise applications is not important for us, as we only want to present an S3 bucket for our backup, which we have done, and it works very fast. We use the Purity software's data reduction techniques; we have a backup software that compresses everything before sending it to the S3 bucket, achieving a data reduction of 1.1 to one. I would recommend Pure Storage FlashBlade to other companies because it's a very fast and scalable solution for anyone who needs it. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution an 8.

Read full review

GiovanniRamirez

Senior IT Consultant at Xerif

Flexible and scalable file system for growing storage needs

Gluster FS is used for various purposes, including virtualization, collaboration, and data center environments. It is also applied in personal environments. Some specific use cases mentioned include scaling a three-terabyte file system into a 12-terabyte file system with minimal downtime Gluster…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features include the ease of implementation, ease of use and the speed that you can do backup and recovery on."

"The ease of deployment and management has helped us simplify our storage. We also do not have to worry about capacity management as much. A lot of these things are native to Pure Storage."

"The best features Everpure FlashBlade offers, which stand out to both me and our customers, are its exceptional performance for AI and analytics workloads, its ability to scale seamlessly, its unified file and object storage architecture, and simplicity of management."

"We chose Pure because we like their support model and we like their performance."

"The main feature I have found to be product replication."

"For those who are interested in using this solution, I would recommend it."

"I would rate this solution an eight plus. It has has good flexibility and stability, it's easy to manage and the response time is good."

"The most valuable features are the Metro clustering, and disaster recovery."

More Everpure FlashBlade pros

"The technical support team is excellent."

"The most valuable feature of the product is that it's very easy to upgrade storage."

"If it is designed correctly, it can be used for everything, it has high availability, and that is what we need it for, and the price tag is good compared to the amount of data and high availability provided."

"It's very easy to upgrade storage."

"Notable features of Gluster FS include flexibility, scalability, stability, and ease of use."

Cons

"It's on the expensive side, as expected for a niche product."

"The integration with S3 needs some improvement."

"An area for improvement in Pure Storage FlashBlade is its price. It could be reduced. The technical support for Pure Storage FlashBlade also needs improvement. It used to be good, with more experienced engineers. Nowadays, it isn't, and it takes longer for support to solve problems."

"Some of the customers that we sell this into may not see increased performance, but they see improved soft costs on the back end."

"The only thing I feel FlashBlade is missing is the SOS API. If it had SOS API, that would put it well over the top."

"I would like to see more deduplication."

"Commvault has mainly driven the Analytics, providing data and reports. However, the product has room for improvement, especially regarding storage analytics. Upgrading firmware has caused issues, requiring feature disabling to revert to traditional backups. The firmware upgrades sometimes affect Commvault backups."

"We initially encountered challenges with the assembly process due to issues with the documentation required during setup, an area where Pure Storage needs improvement."

More Everpure FlashBlade cons

"There is a feature in Red Hat’s commercial version that could be beneficial if integrated into the open-source version."

"The performance of the solution must be improved."

"In terms of improvement, my initial suggestion would be that the user interface could be simplified."

"The system should be more intuitive and easier to manage."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is a little high."

"Support is a separate line item. Support is a different cost, but whatever your support is now, that's what you're going to pay forever. If your support's $100 today, six years from now it's $100. It doesn't fluctuate unless you upgrade it, or change it, etc."

"I understand that it is competitively priced compared to other brands."

"Our licensing is renewed annually."

"The pricing for FlashBlade is between cheap and moderate."

"It's a costly solution, but Pure Storage FlashBlade doesn't require additional licenses. All of the software is combined into one bundle."

"I feel that the price could always be lowered."

"The product is very expensive."

More Everpure FlashBlade pricing and cost advice

"If you need cheap storage, but still need high availability, it's a good product to look at."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Healthcare Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashBlade?

I am a reseller, so I do not use Everpure FlashBlade personally, which means I do not have direct experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashBlade?

I would not rate Everpure FlashBlade as a perfect score primarily due to the price point in the Brazilian market. Everpure FlashBlade is a premium solution and the investment can be a challenge for...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Pure Storage FlashBlade?

Our main use case for Everpure FlashBlade is that we haven't closed a deal in Brazil yet. However, we are working on several opportunities and promoting the solution with our partners and customers...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Gluster Storage?

There is a feature in Red Hat’s commercial version that could be beneficial if integrated into the open-source version. This feature involves managing storage pools with different technologies and ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Gluster Storage?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Gluster Storage?

I would highly recommend Gluster FS to others considering it. The system is robust, flexible, and easy to use. I'd rate it ten out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale vs Everpure FlashBlade

Compared 13% of the time

VAST Data vs Everpure FlashBlade

Compared 8% of the time

Everpure FlashArray vs Everpure FlashBlade

Compared 5% of the time

Dell ObjectScale vs Everpure FlashBlade

Compared 5% of the time

MinIO vs Everpure FlashBlade

Compared 5% of the time

More Everpure FlashBlade Competitors

VMware vSAN vs Red Hat Gluster Storage

Compared 16% of the time

Veritas Access vs Red Hat Gluster Storage

Compared 9% of the time

LizardFS vs Red Hat Gluster Storage

Compared 9% of the time

SUSE Enterprise Storage vs Red Hat Gluster Storage

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Spectrum Scale vs Red Hat Gluster Storage

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Hat Gluster Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Everpure FlashBlade

August 2026

Download Everpure FlashBlade product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

July 2026

Download Red Hat Gluster Storage product report

Also Known As

Pure Storage FlashBlade

Red Hat Gluster, Red Hat Storage Server

Overview

FlashBlade is a software designed for unifying file and object storage to support modern workloads such as analytics, artificial intelligence, and rapid data recovery. The software provides scalable, high-performance storage that enables simultaneous access for large numbers of users and workloads. Its features include support for various data protocols, data reduction techniques, and simple management tools to streamline operations. FlashBlade addresses business problems related to managing large volumes of unstructured data and facilitates faster data processing, enabling organizations to derive insights and value from their information assets. The software assists enterprises in consolidating their data storage infrastructure and improving efficiency in handling complex data tasks.

What are the most important features of FlashBlade?

Ease of Use: Simplifies data management with intuitive controls.
High Performance: Delivers exceptional speed for data-intensive tasks.
Scalability: Expands effortlessly to meet growing data demands.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing systems for efficient operation.
Predictive Analytics: Provides insights to optimize performance proactively.
Inline Deduplication: Reduces storage footprint without compromising speed.
Disaster Recovery: Ensures data availability during disruptions.

What are the potential benefits or ROI in choosing FlashBlade?

Cost-effectiveness: Provides exceptional performance at a competitive price point.
Minimal Maintenance: Reduces operational overhead with simple management.
Clear Dashboards: Enhances decision-making with accessible performance metrics.
Reliable Performance: Offers consistent output, critical for data-intensive industries.

In data center consolidation, media management, and PACS archiving, FlashBlade meets specific industry needs. Companies in banking and healthcare leverage cost-effective performance and scalability for efficient data access, supporting AI training, big data analytics, and enterprise workloads with high IOPS requirements. Media and entertainment entities use it for video editing and storage management, benefiting from seamless NAS, file, and object storage.

Everpure (formerly Pure Storage)

Red Hat Gluster Storage features high availability, simplified storage upgrades, and implementation ease. Offering flexibility and scalability, it's simple to manage via command line and uses minimal resources, providing a cost-effective storage solution for managing large data sets.

Red Hat Gluster Storage delivers reliable and scalable storage tailored for high-demand environments. Known for flexibility, it can handle tasks from log file storage to data center applications. While it offers a stable and scalable platform, users suggest improvements in interface simplification and performance enhancement. Integrating commercial storage pool management could enhance its open-source version.

What are the key features of Red Hat Gluster Storage?

High Availability: Ensures continuous data access, critical for financial sectors.
Scalable: Easily grows with expanding data needs.
Command Line Management: Allows for straightforward administration.
Cost-Effective: Manages data efficiently with minimal resource use.

What benefits can users expect from Red Hat Gluster Storage?

Flexibility: Adapts to varied storage and scaling needs.
Stability: Provides a dependable platform for high-volume data operations.
Resource Efficiency: Optimizes resource use for cost savings.

Banks and financial institutions leverage Red Hat Gluster Storage for robust data storage solutions configured with replication and NFS. Applicable in scenarios like log storage or virtualization, it supports file system scaling from 3TB to 12TB, addressing the demands of data-intensive tasks while facing challenges in performance consistency across different use cases.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

NTT Plala, McMaster University, University of Basque Country, Goodtech ASA, Cox Automotive, Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ), SaskTel, Glashart Media, Casio

Buyer's Guide

Everpure FlashBlade vs. Red Hat Gluster Storage

August 2026

Free Report: Everpure FlashBlade vs. Red Hat Gluster Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about Everpure FlashBlade vs. Red Hat Gluster Storage and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Everpure FlashBlade vs. Red Hat Gluster Storage report.

See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.