Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ETL Solutions Transformation Manager vs IBM Cloud Pak for Data comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ETL Solutions Transformatio...
Ranking in Data Integration
55th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Cloud Pak for Data
Ranking in Data Integration
23rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Data Virtualization (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of ETL Solutions Transformation Manager is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Data is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Cloud Pak for Data1.3%
ETL Solutions Transformation Manager0.9%
Other97.8%
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Ravi Kuppusamy - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO and Founder at BAssure Solutions
It lets us create models so we can generate real-time predictions and insights for a our clients
Transformation Manager reporting could be better. There are better options for reporting tools these days. We use Microsoft BI sometimes, but Tableau is becoming too expensive. Microsoft BI's visualization features are maturing. I would like it if we could set the solution up to process and respond to real-time events. For example, say I want to configure an app to run based on the mileage a car has driven, and I configure the metering system, so the event occurs every 15 days. Let's say we want to automatically send an alert to EMS, police, etc. if a car gets into an accident. Transformation Manager is more of a conventional tool for reporting, extracting volume, bulk loading, etc. but there should be more provisions for dealing with real-time events, creating some insights, and dealing with perishable data. Ten minutes after the accident, the data doesn't have value. It has value before you saved the person.
DJ
Operations Manager at IQVIA
Centralized data analysis has improved collaboration and delivers faster data driven decisions
The best features IBM Cloud Pak for Data offers include low-code or no-code options, which can be used by any technical expertise level. The user interface is very intuitive and easy to customize and navigate for any user, making the learning curve smooth. IBM Cloud Pak for Data is an all-in-one cloud-native data and AI platform that centralizes everything to one single platform, making it easy for viewing our data. It connected with our product for integration with the cloud and helped us enable all of our data users to collaborate from a single unified interface that supports many services designed to work together. I appreciate the low-code no-code feature for its visualization and reporting capabilities, which are very helpful in analyzing insights and making data-driven decisions. IBM Cloud Pak for Data has positively impacted my organization by saving a lot of time by predicting outcomes faster using a platform built with data fabric architecture. It has also enabled us to easily collect, organize, and analyze data, no matter where it is, thereby gaining insights we use to make data-driven decisions easily. It eliminates manual cataloging, which saves time and cost. When comparing it with our previous solution, we have been able to save approximately 70% of our time monthly. We have also been able to make data-driven and concrete decisions more easily compared to our previous solution. Our security has also been strengthened because IBM Cloud Pak for Data provides robust security features that protect our data.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is among the best, even if not widely known."
"Back in the day, we could only get reports and analyze what happened after the fact, but today now we can generate real-time insights. Transformation Manager feeds your data science projects. We generate models and then give them to the clients, so they can come up with real-time predictions and recommendations in addition to reporting."
"It is a reliable solution."
"The most valuable features are data virtualization and reporting."
"You can model the data there, connect the data models with the business processes and create data lineage processes."
"IBM Watson Catalog and data pipelines are the most valuable features of the solution."
"Cloud Pak's most valuable features are IBM MQ, IBM App Connect, IBM API Connect, and ISPF."
"Cloud Pak is a very, very, very good system."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten."
"DataStage allows me to connect to different data sources."
"IBM Cognos is very stable and has been around for many years, with many users familiar with it, making it a reliable solution for our institution."
 

Cons

"Transformation Manager reporting could be better. There are better options for reporting tools these days. We use Microsoft BI sometimes, but Tableau is becoming too expensive. Microsoft BI's visualization features are maturing."
"They should build a functional architecture based on queuing."
"There is room for improvement in the solution's visualization tool."
"The technical support could be a little better."
"Pricing is something that could be reduced, especially for small business enterprises to afford IBM Cloud Pak for Data."
"The interface could improve because sometimes it becomes slow. Sometimes there is a delay between clicks when using the software, which can make the development process slow. It can take a few seconds to complete one action, and then a few more seconds to do the next one."
"The setup cost is very expensive. The cost depends on the pieces of the solution I'm using, how much data I have, and whether it's on the cloud or on-prem."
"The solution's user experience is an area that has room for improvement."
"One challenge I'm facing with IBM Cloud Pak for Data is native features have been decommissioned, such as XML input and output. Too many changes have been made, and my company has around one hundred thousand mappings, so my team has been putting more effort into alternative ways to do things. Another area for improvement in IBM Cloud Pak for Data is that it's more complicated to shift from on-premise to the cloud. Other vendors provide secure agents that easily connect with your existing setup. Still, with IBM Cloud Pak for Data, you have to perform connection migration steps, upgrade to the latest version, etc., which makes it more complicated, especially as my company has XML-based mappings. Still, the XML input and output capabilities of IBM Cloud Pak for Data have been discontinued, so I'd like IBM to bring that back."
"The tool depends on the control plane, an OpenShift container platform utilized as an orchestration layer...So, we have communicated this issue to IBM and asked if it is feasible to adapt the solution to work on a Kubernetes platform that we support."
"The product is trying to be more maturity in terms of connectors. That, I believe, is an area where Cloud Pak can improve."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive solution."
"IBM Cloud Pak for Data is expensive. If we include the training time and the machine learning, it's expensive. The cost of the execution is more reasonable."
"The solution's pricing is competitive with that of other vendors."
"I don't have the exact licensing cost for IBM Cloud Pak for Data, as my company is still finalizing requirements, including monthly, yearly, and three-year licensing fees. Still, on a scale of one to five, I'd rate it a three because, compared to other vendors, it's more complicated."
"For the licensing of the solution, there is a yearly payment that needs to be made. Also, since it is expensive, cost-wise, I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten."
"It's quite expensive."
"The solution is expensive."
"Cloud Pak's cost is a little high."
"I think that this product is too expensive for smaller companies."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Retailer
12%
Performing Arts
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Financial Services Firm
27%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Cloud Pak for Data?
The pricing and setup cost are handled by a different procurement team. Our IT procurement team is centralized, so licensing and the actual cost of the software are taken care of by a different tea...
What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Data?
I do not know if Cognos has all the features that users are looking for since we provide it as our standard and do not maintain infrastructure for other tools.
What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Data?
The main use case for IBM Cognos is for business intelligence and reporting.
 

Also Known As

Transformation Manager
Cloud Pak for Data
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honda, BNP Paribas, RBS, JPMorgan, Volkswagen, Thorn Lighting, OpenSpirit, Rolls-Royce, Ulster Bank
Qatar Development Bank, GuideWell, Skanderborg Music Festival
Find out what your peers are saying about ETL Solutions Transformation Manager vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Data and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.