Enablon vs RSA Archer comparison


Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Categories and Ranking

Ranking in GRC
Average Rating
Number of Reviews
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
RSA Archer
Ranking in GRC
Average Rating
Number of Reviews
Ranking in other categories
IT Governance (1st), IT Vendor Risk Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the GRC category, the mindshare of Enablon is 0.5%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Archer is 17.9%, down from 21.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
IT Governance
IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

Use Enablon?
Share your opinion
Raviteja Nekkanti - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 17, 2023
User-friendly, minimal learning curve and good for security assessment
My use case is for security assessment. It's my daily task. I use it for security assessment in Azure. We have tickets where users need to submit details about an application, computer, or server. For Archer, my direct task is to assess the security risk of an application, infrastructure, or…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price of RSA Archer is good. The price isn't too high considering it is a leading tool in the market."
"I am not sure about other companies, but it's quite expensive."
"The solution's price should be reduced. You only have to pay the license and there are no additional fees."
"The solution’s pricing is moderate."
"It is not expensive. It is reasonable. We only pay for the licensing."
"At the higher end of the price scale, but provides better, more accessible functionality and customization than cheaper products."
"The initial purchase is cheap. You pay a nominal price to start then renew the license annually. You also must buy a license for each module. I'm not too fond of that aspect of the licensing model. You buy the elephant and then spend more money to feed the elephant."
"RSA Archer's price is justifiable and not as expensive, compared to ServiceNow. I have heard that the licensing for ServiceNow is much more expensive. I'm unaware whether there are any additional costs after licensing fees."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
789,577 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
Financial Services Firm
Computer Software Company
Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about RSA Archer?
It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks helps us understand it better and verify its compliance.
What needs improvement with RSA Archer?
The user interface needs work. There are many small text boxes, like credit card size's boxes, where we need to input a lot of text. You can't see what you're typing beyond the tiny window, so you ...
What is your primary use case for RSA Archer?
We primarily use the system control module and specific IT control models for ongoing risk assessment activities. We use it on a day-to-day basis.


No data available

Also Known As

Enablon GRC Suite



Sample Customers

T-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: May 2024.
789,577 professionals have used our research since 2012.