Elastic Security and WatchGuard EPDR compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. User reviews suggest WatchGuard EPDR has an upper hand in deployment and customer service, while Elastic Security excels in cost-efficiency.
Features: Elastic Security is praised for its powerful search capabilities, advanced threat detection, and real-time analytics. WatchGuard EPDR stands out for its comprehensive protection, intuitive management, and automated threat detection.
Room for Improvement: Elastic Security users express a need for improved integration with other systems, more comprehensive documentation, and enhanced customer service. WatchGuard EPDR users suggest improvements in reporting features, a streamlined update process, and better user interface customization.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Security has a straightforward deployment process but receives mixed feedback on customer service responsiveness. WatchGuard EPDR garners positive feedback for both easy deployment and supportive customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Elastic Security is considered cost-effective with significant ROI due to its robust features. WatchGuard EPDR is higher in cost but justified by its comprehensive security offerings and reliability.
It does not require hefty security budgets and can be deployed for enterprise security effectively.
I can say that knowing you have a product like WatchGuard EPDR that's working 24/7 to help protect students in a school is good for ROI.
Most of the time when my team encounters issues, they receive responses within 24 hours.
Support is prompt and helpful.
They create a case, tell me to refer to articles, and if not resolved, they take a remote session to solve the issue.
The technical support from WatchGuard would rate at about an eight on a scale of 1 to 10, where one is the worst technical support and 10 is the best technical support.
Technical support for Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is provided by the reseller, and they also do preventive maintenance yearly.
It allows us to think about specific use cases, such as gathering malicious IPs in a single view and analyzing threats based on geolocation.
WatchGuard EPDR is very competitive regarding its scalability.
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
It is very stable with no hanging problems.
WatchGuard EPDR is a very stable solution and is not resource intensive.
The stability is approximately a seven to eight out of ten.
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently.
Elastic Security consumes a lot of resources, requiring a substantial deployment setup.
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is not compatible with certain network devices like access points, switches, or routers, which would be an area for improvement.
Other firewalls allow adding categories and in-app controls which WatchGuard currently lacks.
An area for improvement would be the software deployment to seamlessly deploy software packages across multiple machines simultaneously.
This is beneficial for SMEs as they do not need extensive budgets for security solutions.
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels.
It is worth the money and provides good return on investment.
Regarding pricing, I am not sure because I did not compare it with other antivirus; maybe it is pricey.
The pricing is slightly high, but the product quality justifies it.
Elastic Security offers good insight regarding alerts, reports, and cases.
We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data.
Elastic Security offers advanced features such as machine learning and integration with ChatGPT.
The cloud of WatchGuard lets me see all my devices, updating me to minute levels with detailed information, such as patch status and vulnerabilities.
The software deployment is also a key aspect of the solution.
The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
WatchGuard EPDR | 1.9% |
Elastic Security | 2.4% |
Other | 95.7% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 40 |
Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
Large Enterprise | 14 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 26 |
Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
Large Enterprise | 1 |
Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.
Additional offerings and benefits:
Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.
EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.