Elastic Observability vs Ixia Hawkeye comparison

Elastic and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Elastic is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #63. Elastic holds a 2.0% mindshare in IM, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Elastic Observability

Read 29 Elastic Observability reviews

8,436 Views
3,374 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

1,047 Views
544 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Ixia Hawkeye

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Ixia Hawkeye and Elastic Observability compete in the network performance and observability markets, respectively. Elastic Observability holds an advantage with its extensive ecosystem integration and broader functionalities, while Ixia Hawkeye specializes in network performance, offering competitive pricing and customer support.

Features: Ixia Hawkeye focuses on network path monitoring and real user traffic emulation, providing insights into network performance and latency. It is tailored for organizations prioritizing network health. Elastic Observability provides end-to-end application performance monitoring, log management, and infrastructure monitoring, allowing integrated observability across complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Ixia Hawkeye could enhance its application monitoring and expand its ecosystem integration for users needing comprehensive observability solutions. Improvements in user interface flexibility and scalability could add value to its offering. Elastic Observability could streamline its setup process, enhance the accessibility of support resources, and adjust pricing models to accommodate smaller businesses looking for robust solutions without high initial costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ixia Hawkeye is known for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer service, making it accessible for network performance monitoring. Elastic Observability may require more effort in deployment due to its extensive features but benefits from seamless integration within the Elastic ecosystem once operational, though its customer support could use better accessibility.

Pricing and ROI: Ixia Hawkeye offers competitive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious companies focused on network performance with quicker ROI. Elastic Observability's pricing may be higher initially, reflecting its extensive feature set, which provides significant value in the long run for enterprises seeking comprehensive observability. Specific pricing details should be verified directly with vendors for precise cost assessment.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Observability vs. Ixia Hawkeye Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. Ixia Hawkeye

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,685 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Observability

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (6th), Log Management (14th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th)

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

63rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (6th), Network Monitoring Software (83rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Elastic Observability is 2.0%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Elastic Observability	2.0%
Ixia Hawkeye	0.5%
Other	97.5%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Mohammed-Abdelalim

Assistant Vice President at QualityKiosk Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Has provided powerful customization for unique monitoring needs but needs more out-of-the-box capabilities

In my opinion, the best features of Elastic Observability are their flexibility to integrate with other existing systems and the ability to build a unified monitoring tool that can integrate with existing ones and end-to-end user journeys which require a lot of customizations. The greatest feature in Elastic is the ability to customize. This is similar to my comments about customizable dashboards in Elastic because it's visible to the analyst. However, it's very great. Customizing these dashboards can meet the customer's specific use cases and specific stories that they have in their environment, their special environment that doesn't look like other environments. The dashboarding in Elastic is highly customizable to the level of logos. If the customer wants his company logo in the dashboard, it can be done.

Read full review

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Elastic provides built-in features for queries and report generation. It's a very good tool for monitoring integration capabilities."

"All the features that we use, such as monitoring, dashboarding, reporting, the possibility of alerting, and the way we index the data, are important."

"I recommend Elastic Observability for its completeness of vision and wide ecosystem."

"The most valuable feature of Elastic Observability is the text search."

"The price is very less expensive compared to the other solutions."

"The solution is open-source and helps with back-end logging. It is also easy to handle."

"The product has connectors to many services."

"The tool's most valuable feature is centralized logging. Elastic Common Search helps us to search for the logs across the organization."

More Elastic Observability pros

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

Cons

"Elastic Observability is reactive rather than proactive. It should act as an ITSM tool and be able to create tickets and alerts on Jira."

"If we had some pre-defined templates for observability that we could start using right away after deploying it – instead of having to build or to change some of the dashboards – that would be helpful."

"Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema."

"It lacked some capabilities when handling on-prem devices, like network observability, package flow analysis, and device performance data on the infrastructure side."

"Elastic APM's visualization is not that great compared to other tools. It's number of metrics is very low."

"The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration of hot, warm, and cold zones for data storage. Additionally, managing log retention policies adds further complexity. The solution's pricing also needs to be cheaper."

"One example is the inability to monitor very old databases with the newest version."

"The price is the only issue in the solution. It can be made better and cheaper."

More Elastic Observability cons

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We will buy a premium license after POC."

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"The product is not that cheap."

"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."

"Elastic Observability's pricing could be better for small-scale users."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

"We have been using the open-source version."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

The problem is their licensing model, which is a bit confusing. Many customers struggle to understand their total cost of ownership because Elastic licensing is not dependent on easy, quantifiable ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

After careful consideration about areas for improvement in Elastic Observability, aspects such as pricing, customization, implementation, and scalability could be improved. As a user of the system,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 8% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 8% of the time

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 7% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 15% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 13% of the time

Aurea CX Monitor vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 12% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 11% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 11% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

January 2026

Download Elastic Observability product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Overview

Elastic Observability offers a comprehensive suite for log analytics, application performance monitoring, and machine learning. It integrates seamlessly with platforms like Teams and Slack, enhancing data visualization and scalability for real-time insights.

Elastic Observability is designed to support production environments with features like logging, data collection, and infrastructure tracking. Centralized logging and powerful search functionalities make incident response and performance tracking efficient. Elastic APM and Kibana facilitate detailed data visualization, promoting rapid troubleshooting and effective system performance analysis. Integrated services and extensive connectivity options enhance its role in business and technical decision-making by providing actionable data insights.

What are the most important features of Elastic Observability?

Centralized Logging: Streamlines the collection, analysis, and storage of log data.
Powerful Search: Provides robust search capabilities for quick access to relevant information.
Scalability: Supports growing data needs across diverse environments.
Real-time Telemetry: Ensures up-to-date insights and monitoring.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly connects with services like Teams and Slack.
Data Visualization: Enhances visibility with Elastic APM and Kibana.

What benefits and ROI should users explore in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers significant savings through efficient data management.
Rapid Incident Response: Minimizes downtime with quick troubleshooting tools.
Comprehensive Insights: Supports better business decisions with detailed data analysis.
Performance Tracking: Enables assessment of system effectiveness and improvements.

Elastic Observability is employed across industries for critical operations, such as in finance for transaction monitoring, in healthcare for secure data management, and in technology for optimizing application performance. Its data-driven approach aids efficient event tracing, supporting diverse industry requirements.

Elastic

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

EMA

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. Ixia Hawkeye

January 2026

Free Report: Elastic Observability vs. Ixia Hawkeye

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Observability vs. Ixia Hawkeye and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Observability vs. Ixia Hawkeye report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.