We performed a comparison between Elastic Beats and Quest InTrust based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management."The security aspects in general have been very useful to use."
"There's a whole spectrum of features on the solution that users can take advantage of. It's a very robust product."
"I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"The dashboard is not user-friendly. The solution, in general, isn't great from a user's perspective."
"At some level, the documentation, the information as far as the components, it's sometimes a little difficult to find the information necessary to implement aspects."
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
"It needs to have better reporting. "
Elastic Beats doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Log Management while Quest InTrust is ranked 52nd in Log Management. Elastic Beats is rated 8.0, while Quest InTrust is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Beats writes "A robust solution with a whole spectrum of features that's extremely scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". Elastic Beats is most compared with , whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.