No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs InfluxDB comparison

Why PeerSpot?
EnterpriseDB and InfluxData are both solutions in the Open Source Databases category. EnterpriseDB is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.7, while InfluxData is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1. EnterpriseDB holds a 2.4% mindshare in OSD, compared to InfluxData’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of EnterpriseDB users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of InfluxData users who would recommend it.
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Read 12 EDB Postgres Advanced Server reviews
  • 2,357 Views
  • 2,357 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
InfluxDB
Read 20 InfluxDB reviews
  • 8,832 Views
  • 3,268 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

InfluxDB and EDB Postgres Advanced Server are competitive in the data management field. InfluxDB specializes in time-series data, showing superior performance for real-time data, while EDB Postgres Advanced Server is robust for enterprise-level applications.

Features: InfluxDB's high-performance capabilities for handling time-series data make it ideal for real-time analytics. It seamlessly integrates with tools like Grafana and has excellent documentation and plugins. Additionally, it supports fast time-bulk queries and window operations. EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers enhanced security, Oracle compatibility, and extensive analytics support. It also features robust backup tools, multi-tenancy support, and can efficiently manage JSONB data.

Room for Improvement: InfluxDB could improve in areas such as expanding support services and refining the deployment process for enterprise environments. Enhancing its continuous query feature and user interface customization can also be beneficial. EDB Postgres Advanced Server could optimize licensing costs and improve integration speed. Simplifying the user interface and enhancing multi-machine distribution capabilities might further enhance its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: EDB Postgres Advanced Server provides a mature deployment model with substantial support services, ensuring a smoother integration for enterprise settings. InfluxDB offers straightforward scalable deployment, though the support services might require enhancement to match enterprise needs.

Pricing and ROI: InfluxDB usually offers lower initial costs, making it ideal for organizations targeting cost-effective time-series data solutions. It delivers a good ROI in its niche market. EDB Postgres Advanced Server might involve higher setup costs but provides a comprehensive feature set and better ROI for organizations requiring enterprise-grade functionalities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. InfluxDB Report (Updated: November 2026).
Buyer's Guide
EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. InfluxDB
November 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Ranking in Open Source Databases
13th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
InfluxDB
Ranking in Open Source Databases
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Non-Relational Databases (1st), Network Monitoring Software (16th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), NoSQL Databases (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of EDB Postgres Advanced Server is 2.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InfluxDB is 4.7%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
InfluxDB4.7%
EDB Postgres Advanced Server2.4%
Other92.9%
Open Source Databases
 

Featured Reviews

SB
Shardul Borhade
Database Engineer at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees
Centralized management has reduced database overhead but pricing and documentation have needed work
What I appreciate about EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that it offers management tools such as PEM and CNPG under one umbrella, providing enterprise features that eliminate the need for multiple engineers to maintain PostgreSQL databases, although it is somewhat expensive. I evaluate the technical support and customer service of EDB Postgres Advanced Server as really good, as I have sought their help three to four times regarding issues with PEM configuration, and they respond quickly and solve issues promptly. I would rate the technical support of EDB Postgres Advanced Server an 8 out of 10. EDB Postgres Advanced Server's high availability and disaster recovery features, specifically the introduction of CNPG based on Kubernetes, are good, but they require significant infrastructure overhead, which I believe necessitates a lightweight integration model for better performance. I rate the efficiency improvements from EDB Postgres Advanced Server a 10 out of 10 when it comes to Oracle compatibility. Its native support for Oracle's PL/SQL syntax makes evaluating and migrating legacy workloads incredibly smooth, bypassing the typical headaches of manual code rewrites.
Read full review
Mugeesh Husain - PeerSpot reviewer
Mugeesh Husain
Team Lead, Software at Energybox
Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement
How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product is user-friendly."
"This product has allowed us to reduce costs in some parts of our infrastructure without losing functionality."
"What I appreciate about EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that it offers management tools such as PEM and CNPG under one umbrella, providing enterprise features that eliminate the need for multiple engineers to maintain PostgreSQL databases, although it is somewhat expensive."
"I like that EDB Postgres Advanced Server scales well. A valuable feature of the solution is multi-tenancy support. It also supports JSONB."
"The low cost and functionality allows us to save money on smaller database projects."
"I rate EDB Postgres Advanced Server's stability an eight out of ten."
"The feature of vector database management for AI is quite interesting and impactful."
"Major reduction in run cost, and a quantum leap in the flexibility of deployment models Elimination of replication of transaction from reporting systems Able to do rolling upgrades with zero production downtime."
More EDB Postgres Advanced Server pros
"InfluxDB positively impacts my organization because I have optimized my database storage, and by using powerful queries, I am able to find my data logs efficiently and also manage logging."
"The most valuable features of InfluxDB are the documentation and performance, and the good plugins metrics in the ecosystem."
"InfluxDB has played a key role in enhancing system reliability and supporting our goal of delivering a seamless, high-quality product."
"While I would rate InfluxDB a ten on a scale of one to ten, users should be thoughtful about matching the engine to their specific needs."
"In our case, it started with a necessity to fill the gap that we had in monitoring. We had very reactive monitoring without trend analysis and without some advanced features. We were able to implement them by using a time series database. We are able to have all the data from applications, logs, and systems, and we can use a simple query language to correlate all the data and make things happen, especially with monitoring. We could more proactively monitor our systems and our players' trends."
"As a time series database, it is very powerful and lightweight, and it can deal with heavy workloads very easily."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is we can use InfluxDB to integrate with and plug into any other tools."
"InfluxDB reduced my time to show data without any interruption, also reducing the number of people needed to manage the project; it is very good to have InfluxDB in my project."
More InfluxDB pros
 

Cons

"The product currently fails to offer a mobile application."
"Lighter integration model for containerized deployment. Effectively, there still remain some issues with a containerized deployment, so we have opted for a non-containerized deployment."
"The system is aging and not keeping up with the performance of new, enhanced database models."
"I would like to see improvements in the performance, especially in large-scale operations, as it currently cannot match Oracle's performance."
"Setting up MySQL is slightly more straightforward than Postgres."
"There aren't specific new features we wish to add."
"From a pricing perspective, I do not find it cost-effective from DBtune's SaaS perspective as we are just testing it, but for enterprises, it is worth it as you do not require many engineers for management and receive good support."
"For improvement purposes, I think EDB Postgres Advanced Server needs some enhanced monitoring since the current default monitoring is not sufficient; an EDB monitoring tool could provide useful metrics to help end users avoid production issues."
More EDB Postgres Advanced Server cons
"If it gets a little bit more into the metric side, then it would really be great, similar to Prometheus."
"InfluxDB can be improved in several ways. The Flux query language needs to be learned, but if there were something similar to SQL or previous options, it would be much easier for users without imposing a learning curve."
"The solution doesn't have much of a user interface."
"InfluxDB is generally stable, but we've encountered issues with the configuration file in our ticket stack. For instance, a mistake in one of the metrics out of a hundred KPIs can disrupt data collection for all KPIs. This happens because the agent stops working if there's an issue with any configuration part. To address this, it is essential to ensure that all configurations are part of the agent's EXE file when provided. This makes it easier to package the agent for server installation and ensures all KPIs are available from the server. Additionally, the agent cannot encrypt and decrypt passwords for authentication, which can be problematic when monitoring URLs or requiring authentication tokens. This requires additional scripting and can prolong service restart times."
"The error logging capability can be improved because the logs are not very informative."
"InfluxDB can improve by including new metrics on other technologies. They had some changes recently to pool data from endpoints but the functionality is not good enough in the industry."
"Customer support is fair enough but can be improved."
"InfluxDB can be improved by addressing issues such as performance drops, queries being more difficult to understand, and its high memory usage."
More InfluxDB cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is significantly lower than competing products."
"EDB Postgres Advanced Server is open source, so I don't pay for licensing."
"It is an open-source product."
"I have been working on the community edition."
"The product is either free with community support or very inexpensive with a small yearly fee for paid support."
"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."
"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."
"The tool is an open-source product."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Outsourcing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that it is very cost-efficient, easy to set up, and can be deployed in a containerized manner.
See all answers
What needs improvement with EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
For improvement purposes, I think EDB Postgres Advanced Server needs some enhanced monitoring since the current default monitoring is not sufficient; an EDB monitoring tool could provide useful met...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
My main use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that we have a telecommunication billing product where I am using it as a backend database to handle all the requests. A specific example of how...
See all answers
What needs improvement with InfluxDB?
If the dashboarding facility can be improved in terms of the visualization parameters and the amount of support available from the community, as well as having smarter alerts to send those alerts t...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?
My main use case for InfluxDB is to inject all my performance data and visualize it as a data source into Grafana. My data comes from JMeter from a plugin, which is inserting data to InfluxDB, and ...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering InfluxDB?
It is good to start with InfluxDB to stabilize your data, visualize your data, and have the data stored on a time-series basis. I would recommend everyone to get into InfluxDB and start using it. T...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 18% of the time
Percona Server vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
Percona Server vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 16% of the time
YugabyteDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
YugabyteDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 12% of the time
Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 7% of the time
ClickHouse vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
ClickHouse vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 4% of the time
More EDB Postgres Advanced Server Competitors
PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB Logo
PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB
Compared 5% of the time
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB Logo
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB
Compared 5% of the time
MySQL vs InfluxDB Logo
MySQL vs InfluxDB
Compared 5% of the time
ClickHouse vs InfluxDB Logo
ClickHouse vs InfluxDB
Compared 4% of the time
VictoriaMetrics vs InfluxDB Logo
VictoriaMetrics vs InfluxDB
Compared 4% of the time
More InfluxDB Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
November 2026
EDB Postgres Advanced Server reportDownload EDB Postgres Advanced Server product report
Buyer's Guide
InfluxDB
October 2026
InfluxDB reportDownload InfluxDB product report
 

Overview

EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers robust database solutions with standout configurations and flexible support, ideal for demanding environments.

EDB Postgres Advanced Server addresses diverse database needs with advanced tools and configurations. Efficiently managing distributed databases and supporting high availability with Patroni cluster deployment, it provides superior backup solutions and cost-efficient licensing compared to Oracle. Its compatibility with Oracle and vector database management for AI make it suitable for middle and lower-tier clients. However, areas like performance enhancement for large-scale operations, containerized deployments, and better monitoring require attention.

What are the key features of EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
  • Standout Configurations: Offers flexibility and a wide range of indices for varied needs.
  • Patroni Cluster Deployment: Ensures high availability for critical applications.
  • JSONB Support: Provides enhanced management of JSON data.
  • Cost-Efficient Licensing: More affordable than Oracle for budget-conscious organizations.
  • Built-In Scripting: Simplifies automation tasks with ease.
  • PgAdmin Metrics Insights: Delivers valuable database performance metrics.
Why should users consider EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
  • Oracle Compatibility: Smooth transition for users familiar with Oracle systems.
  • AI Database Management: Accommodates vector databases crucial for AI workloads.
  • Multitenancy: Supports multiple users, enhancing flexibility and efficiency.
  • Impressive Speed: Facilitates quick data processing for demanding tasks.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces overall database expenditure.

Organizations deploy EDB Postgres Advanced Server to replace Oracle RAC and manage tasks requiring multiple servers and distributed data access. Educational institutions utilize it for examining architecture and development, with global data centers harnessing its capabilities for engineering endeavors. Academic purposes include teaching database fundamentals and aiding Oracle migrations, while aligning with on-premises deployments due to specific restrictions.

EnterpriseDB

InfluxDB offers efficient time series data handling with fast writes, optimized storage, and seamless Grafana integration, making it ideal for high-volume applications like crypto trading and real-time monitoring. Its SQL-like query language and cloud-based options enhance user experience and system scalability.

InfluxDB stands out with its ability to handle high-volume time series data efficiently, thanks to fast data writes and efficient compression. It is highly scalable, providing clustering features for improved performance management. Integration with Grafana enhances visualization, making it easier to analyze complex data through a user-friendly SQL-like query language. Real-time monitoring, historical data access, and proactive alerts enhance system reliability. Its cloud offering simplifies maintenance and operations, making it attractive for users seeking an efficient time series database.

What are the key features of InfluxDB?
  • Fast Data Writes: Ensures quick data handling necessary for real-time applications.
  • Optimized Storage: Reduces space requirements and improves performance.
  • Efficient Compression: Supports high-volume data like time series, enhancing throughput.
  • Grafana Integration: Supports seamless visualization and analysis of data.
  • SQL-like Query Language: Simplifies complex data operations with user-friendly queries.
What benefits or ROI can users expect?
  • Enhanced Performance: Fast processing and optimized storage for better application responsiveness.
  • Scalability: Clustering features ensure adaptability to growing data volumes.
  • Improved Reliability: Proactive alerts and real-time monitoring prevent system downtimes.
  • Ease of Use: SQL-like language and intuitive visuals improve user accessibility.

InfluxDB is applied extensively in industries handling high-volume data needs. For sensor data storage in production environments, it offers reliable performance. Its role in server management metrics and performance monitoring is crucial for maintaining optimal operations. In crypto market data collection, it supports fast-paced trading environments. Industries use it for real-time tracking, like maritime vessel monitoring, leveraging its rapid data handling and visualization capabilities. Its applications also extend to IoT environments, API performance tracking, HVAC systems, and log aggregation, often integrating with Prometheus, Docker, and AWS to enhance system capabilities.

InfluxData
 

Sample Customers

Ericsson, Clear Capital, PinkRoccade, ABN Amro, WholeWorldBand, Van Genechten, Gallinat-Bank AG, Mariner, coresystems, Aquent, Contegix, AQA, Genscape, InMobi
ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo
Buyer's Guide
EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. InfluxDB
November 2026
Free Report: EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. InfluxDB
Find out what your peers are saying about EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. InfluxDB and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. InfluxDB report.
See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.

We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.