ClickHouse vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server comparison

ClickHouse and EnterpriseDB are both solutions in the Open Source Databases category. ClickHouse is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while EnterpriseDB is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. ClickHouse holds a 6.6% mindshare in OSD, compared to EnterpriseDB’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ClickHouse users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of EnterpriseDB users who would recommend it.

ClickHouse

Read 21 ClickHouse reviews

4,435 Views
2,040 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Read 10 EDB Postgres Advanced Server reviews

1,454 Views
1,454 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

ClickHouse

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

EDB Postgres Advanced Server and ClickHouse compete in the database management space. EDB Postgres Advanced Server holds an advantage for enterprises needing compatibility with Oracle applications, while ClickHouse shines in speed and real-time analytics.

Features: EDB Postgres Advanced Server includes Oracle compatibility, robust security features, and supports JSONB. It provides high availability with Patroni clustering and offers extensive built-in features for scripting. ClickHouse focuses on fast query performance, lightweight architecture for high throughput, and OLAP features that eliminate database locks. It has an S3 engine for scalable storage and is excellent for on-premises setups supporting analytical workloads.

Room for Improvement: EDB Postgres Advanced Server could enhance its real-time analytics capabilities and integration with cloud-native tools. There is a need for more streamlined cross-platform support and reduced complexity in high-availability configurations. ClickHouse may improve by enhancing its support services, increasing the robustness of data recovery options, and increasing documentation comprehensiveness for new users and complex tasks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers extensive documentation and robust support for complex environments, facilitating smoother deployment. ClickHouse provides an easy setup process with quick integration but requires additional commitment to develop organized support channels. Its simple deployment favors rapid analytics platform integration, especially for on-premises implementations.

Pricing and ROI: EDB Postgres Advanced Server typically has higher upfront costs, reflecting its enterprise-grade features and support, but leads to long-term savings through integration efficiencies with Oracle environments. ClickHouse offers a lower entry cost, particularly beneficial for organizations aiming for speedy ROI focused on analytics, with savings seen in on-premises setups due to its cost-effective storage solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed ClickHouse vs. EDB Postgres Advanced Server Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ClickHouse vs. EDB Postgres Advanced Server

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ClickHouse

Ranking in Open Source Databases

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (7th)

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Ranking in Open Source Databases

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of ClickHouse is 6.6%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of EDB Postgres Advanced Server is 2.1%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ClickHouse	6.6%
EDB Postgres Advanced Server	2.1%
Other	91.3%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

reviewer2785038

Senior Data Engineer at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees

Data observability has enabled real‑time analytics and cost savings but needs smoother inserts and cleanup

ClickHouse could be improved concerning data insertion, especially given the high amount of data handled. Constant efforts are made to optimize the features on its own, but with merges and inserts, only a single insert query can be performed allowing for the input of only 100,000 rows per second. It would be beneficial to insert more data and have configurations that are less user-operated. Ideally, ClickHouse would optimize itself to handle these processes automatically, reducing the need to contact the ClickHouse support team for infrastructure optimization. Additionally, delays are experienced when trying to delete databases with corrupt data, taking too much time and causing major outages, which necessitate contacting multiple teams across continents for resolution. The community surrounding ClickHouse also seems limited, providing a reliance on documentation, and there is a scarcity of developers working with ClickHouse, which hinders growth. If ClickHouse were more user-friendly and technically feasible, it would likely see greater expansion in usage.

Read full review

Munirathnakumar Si

Senior Principal Cyber Security Consultant - Cloud and Container at Standard Chartered Bank

Though user-friendly, it fails to offer a mobile application to users

The product currently fails to offer a mobile application. In the future, I want the solution to offer a mobile application, especially since you can access the services via mobile phone with all the service providers like AWS and others. A mobile application provided by the product can help a user to see the status whenever needed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ClickHouse has positively impacted my organization, as there was an entire exercise done on which database we were supposed to use for solving our problems, and we found ClickHouse was the one performing the best, which is when we adopted it."

"ClickHouse provides responses within a few seconds, typically two to three seconds, which is impressive."

"ClickHouse provides great query speeds because it is an OLAP database, so naturally, it provides higher speeds."

"ClickHouse is open source with no vendor lock-in, providing excellent freedom to choose any vendor without restrictions."

"ClickHouse has reduced our storage cost and improved our 99th percentile latency by 40%."

"The tool's most valuable feature is a database. It supports portal APIs and offers good flexibility."

"The tool is column-based and infinitely scalable."

"Regarding performance, we tried multiple solutions when Kibana was failing, including PostgreSQL, MySQL, and even MongoDB for log ingestion of huge volumes, but ClickHouse outperformed all databases we tested, leading us to choose it for further use cases."

More ClickHouse pros

"I like that EDB Postgres Advanced Server scales well. A valuable feature of the solution is multi-tenancy support. It also supports JSONB."

"It gives us a solid, less expensive alternative to deploying with Oracle."

"The product is user-friendly."

"The feature of vector database management for AI is quite interesting and impactful."

"I rate EDB Postgres Advanced Server's stability an eight out of ten."

"The number of indices available in Postgres is remarkable."

"The low cost and functionality allows us to save money on smaller database projects."

"Postgres is highly compatible with many software and programming languages. Its compatibility is excellent, covering nearly everything related to data engineering or migration."

Cons

"ClickHouse can be improved, and the main challenge I see is its operational complexity."

"We had a lot of troubles while deploying a whole cluster."

"ClickHouse could be improved with self-hosting capabilities and better documentation for how to host it at scale."

"I chose nine out of ten because, as I mentioned, the improvement side and the ten thousand partition limit created issues that we were hitting quite frequently, but with some schema manipulations we did manage to find a workaround, although that could have been avoided had things been better documented on how we could have solved this problem in a different approach, which took some bandwidth."

"In terms of needed improvements, some enhancements in documentation are necessary."

"The aggregation capability is a valuable feature. It's highly efficient, allowing us to review entire transaction histories and user activities in the market. We've tried MongoDB, Postgres, MariaDB, and BigQuery, but ClickHouse is the most cost-efficient solution for collecting data at high speeds with minimal cost. We even used ClickHouse Cloud for a month, and it proved to be a great setup, especially for startups looking to handle big data. For example, if there is a need for 2-4 terabytes of data and around 40 billion rows with reasonable computing speed and latency, ClickHouse is ideal. Regarding the real-time query performance of ClickHouse, when using an API server to query it, I achieved query results in less than twenty milliseconds in some of my experiments with one billion rows. However, it depends on the scenario since ClickHouse has limitations in handling mutations. Additionally, one of ClickHouse's strengths is its compression capability. Our experimental server has only four terabytes, and ClickHouse effectively compresses data, allowing us to store large amounts of data at high speed. This compression efficiency is a significant advantage of using ClickHouse."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that it is very expensive—ClickHouse is the most expensive option."

"We would like to have fuzzy search capabilities in ClickHouse like we had with Kibana because there are scenarios where we cannot search keywords fuzzily in ClickHouse, whereas Elasticsearch allows that, and in such cases, Elasticsearch outperforms ClickHouse."

More ClickHouse cons

"I have faced performance issues in the community edition."

"I would like to see improvements in the performance, especially in large-scale operations, as it currently cannot match Oracle's performance."

"The security is not very robust and the product would be much more useful with more security options."

"There aren't specific new features we wish to add."

"An area for improvement in EDB Postgres Advanced Server is JSONB querying. It would be nice to have even stronger JSONB support from the solution."

"The system is aging and not keeping up with the performance of new, enhanced database models."

"The product currently fails to offer a mobile application."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For pricing, if you use the self-hosted version, it would be free. Cloud services pricing would be an eight out of ten. I try to minimize costs but still have to monitor usage."

"The tool is open-source."

"The tool is free."

"ClickHouse has an open-source version, which is free to use and has almost all the features."

"If you have an in-house deployment on Kubernetes or something, it's going to be very cheap since you'll be managing everything."

"We used the free, community version of ClickHouse."

"ClickHouse Cloud is not expensive compared to other databases, costing a few dollars per month while providing fast performance."

"EDB Postgres Advanced Server is open source, so I don't pay for licensing."

"Pricing is significantly lower than competing products."

"The product is either free with community support or very inexpensive with a small yearly fee for paid support."

"I have been working on the community edition."

"It is an open-source product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ClickHouse?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was such that the setup costs were just my own bandwidth, while licensing and pricing were done by other members of the team so it was abstract...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ClickHouse?

ClickHouse can be improved on the documentation side, and there is one small constraint that is mentioned in ClickHouse documentation, which is a partition limit of ten thousand that we hit, so if ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ClickHouse?

My main use case for ClickHouse is data ingestion and for its OLAP properties, as we had use cases where database locks were slowing us down and because ClickHouse does not have that, we chose to u...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers both processor-based and user-based licensing options. The cost is reasonable, particularly for middle and lower-tier customers, but there are hiccups when deali...

See all answers

What needs improvement with EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

It was challenging to think of improvements for Postgres. We did not choose to extend or add new features to Postgres since it already meets our needs so well. There aren't specific new features we...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

Our primary use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server was to study the code base behind it. We aimed to understand how it has been built, how the engine functions, the querying process, and what ki...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenSearch vs ClickHouse

Compared 11% of the time

InfluxDB vs ClickHouse

Compared 10% of the time

VictoriaMetrics vs ClickHouse

Compared 8% of the time

Cassandra vs ClickHouse

Compared 7% of the time

MySQL vs ClickHouse

Compared 6% of the time

More ClickHouse Competitors

PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 30% of the time

YugabyteDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 14% of the time

Percona Server vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 12% of the time

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 6% of the time

More EDB Postgres Advanced Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ClickHouse

March 2026

Download ClickHouse product report

Buyer's Guide

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

March 2026

Download EDB Postgres Advanced Server product report

Overview

ClickHouse is renowned for its speed, scalability, and real-time query performance. Its compatibility with SQL standards enhances flexibility while enabling integration with popular tools.

ClickHouse leverages a column-based architecture for efficient data compression and real-time analytics. It seamlessly integrates with tools like Kafka and Tableau and is effective in handling large datasets due to its cost-efficient aggregation capabilities. With robust data deduplication and strong community backing, users can access comprehensive documentation and up-to-date functionality. However, improvements in third-party integration, cloud deployment, and handling of SQL syntax differences are noted, impacting ease-of-use and migration from other databases.

What features make ClickHouse outstanding?

Speed and Scalability: Enables rapid deployment and scalability, particularly on Kubernetes.
SQL Compatibility: Aligns with SQL standards for flexible database management.
Column-based Structure: Offers efficient data compression and quick query performance.
Integration Support: Works with Kafka, Tableau, and other popular platforms.
Data Deduplication: Manages complex data duplication efficiently.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-Efficiency: Reduces expenses while managing large datasets effectively.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides fast data processing for real-time insights.
Flexibility: Offers multiple integration points and compatibility options.
Robust Documentation: Backed by an active development community, ensuring comprehensive support.

ClickHouse is deployed in sectors like telecommunications for passive monitoring and is beneficial for data analytics, logging Clickstream data, and as an ETL engine. Organizations harness it for machine learning applications when combined with GPT. With the ability to be installed independently, it's an attractive option for avoiding cloud service costs.

ClickHouse

EDB Postgres Advanced Server is a powerful and reliable database management system designed for production workloads. It offers a range of advanced features, making it an ideal choice for businesses looking to scale their operations. With support for multi-tenancy, JSONB, and production features similar to Oracle, the solution is versatile and can meet the needs of a wide range of organizations.

Overall, EDB Postgres Advanced Server is a robust and flexible database management system that can help businesses achieve their goals and stay competitive in today's fast-paced digital landscape.

EnterpriseDB

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Ericsson, Clear Capital, PinkRoccade, ABN Amro, WholeWorldBand, Van Genechten, Gallinat-Bank AG, Mariner, coresystems, Aquent, Contegix, AQA, Genscape, InMobi

Buyer's Guide

ClickHouse vs. EDB Postgres Advanced Server

March 2026

Free Report: ClickHouse vs. EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Find out what your peers are saying about ClickHouse vs. EDB Postgres Advanced Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ClickHouse vs. EDB Postgres Advanced Server report.

See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.

We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.