We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and NetCrunch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Dynatrace AppMon has allowed a deep dive review of performance problems in near real-time for our primary external website and related web apps and web services."
"We can report and monitor on specific use cases which could not be monitored with SAP or other tooling."
"Everybody can show charts and metrics, but Dynatrace’s infographics are amazing. The dashboarding is simply best in class."
"Overall, it has provided improved stability to our system both within prod and non-prod environments."
"It allows you to better utilize and focus your talent, and tell management that you are not only looking at problems, but how you can ultimately make the product better for the end user."
"Since we have been receiving alerts from Dynatrace, we go ahead and fix them without the user knowing about them."
"We had point solutions where we could see different elements of the stack, and Dynatrace ties everything together. Before, we could never get that full-stack monitoring. It also helps us get us the context of the customer experience. What's the business impact of those problems?"
"It helps us get to the resolution quicker, and potentially the root cause, and at least understand what is happening for future identification."
"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."
"A useful addition for known issues would be the ability to automatically perform certain activities as a first attempt to resolve issues which are creating a problem."
"If you want to see a month's data, it keeps on spinning. Here is an improvement which needs to happen, which is the case with all applications or tools. There is a lot of data, and either we have to change the way we are logging or the application needs to be enhanced."
"A role-based view and a Python monitoring tool would make a simple user interface more usable."
"The messaging layer is not really capturable and measurable right now."
"I still don't see the full depth of database metrics for database performance management. For example, I use Oracle Enterprise Manager and I use a type of access that provides me a lot of metrics and meaningful ways to evaluate database performance. That is something I don't see in Dynatrace yet."
"It would be nice to have a simplified monitoring feature for non-Java applications."
"The problem evaluation feature is an awesome idea, but bit difficult to pick up initially."
"Include network monitoring in more detail for deep dive analytics of network components."
"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."
Earn 20 points
Dynatrace is ranked 4th in Log Management with 340 reviews while NetCrunch is ranked 75th in Log Management. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while NetCrunch is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetCrunch writes "A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas NetCrunch is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor and Fortinet FortiSIEM. See our Dynatrace vs. NetCrunch report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
