We performed a comparison between DX SaaS and DX Unified Infrastructure Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Nexthink, Lakeside Software, ControlUp and others in DEM - Digital Experience Monitoring."It supports numerous platforms."
"Actionable insight is the most valuable feature."
"DX allows you to customize and gives you a high degree of control."
"It is the foundation for our monitoring solution."
"The monitoring of the applications to let our business know when things are performing and that they're up and available."
"Monitoring infrastructure and business applications are the most valuable features."
"MultiWAN and Balance service"
"It is easy to implement but requires good planning."
"Great out-of-the-box capability."
"The benefit is easy installation. Thus, the model approach of the product and out-of-the-box probes, which deliver direct value."
"It is easy to implement."
"The ability to scale presents a challenge as the cost of handling vast amounts of data in the cloud must be taken into account."
"Old user interface and dashboards could be improved."
"DX SaaS is a latecomer to the APM market. Some things that are straightforward in Dynatrace are complicated in DX. For example, upgrading the agents is a seamless process in Dynatrace, but it's a pain in DX SaaS. You should be able to upgrade in the Application Command Center. However, it is not working correctly."
"CA UIM needs some improvement with performance reporting (if we compare it to CA eHealth)."
"Reporting capability can be improved especially when it comes to availability."
"Within this product there are individual probes, and each of these probes doesn't always necessarily output the same kind of information into our database. So when we try to collect what's called QoS data, from one probe we might get a ton of information, lots of good stuff that we can use in our database, but then from another probe, we might not get so much or we might not be able to pull the things that we want to."
"There should be wider coverage of storage infrastructure."
"The company has not kept pace with developments."
"I would like to see auditability. We've built our own audit functionality to ensure that every CI has the desired model configuration applied to it. And we run that on a daily basis. If that became part of the product, I think it might be a little bit less intensive in terms of resource, because we're doing it with scripts."
"It needs a little bit more functionality in the Admin Console."
"In the UMP, certain devices will show up multiple times and they don't correlate correctly. That's one of the issues."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
DX SaaS is ranked 9th in DEM - Digital Experience Monitoring with 3 reviews while DX Unified Infrastructure Management is ranked 30th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 120 reviews. DX SaaS is rated 7.0, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of DX SaaS writes "It's highly customizable but lacks many features of available in competing solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of DX Unified Infrastructure Management writes "Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support". DX SaaS is most compared with Zabbix, Nagios XI and Dynatrace, whereas DX Unified Infrastructure Management is most compared with DX Spectrum, SCOM, ManageEngine OpManager, Nagios XI and Zabbix.
We monitor all DEM - Digital Experience Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.