DX NetOps vs LiveNX comparison

Broadcom and BlueCat are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.8, while BlueCat is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.3. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to BlueCat’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 10 DX NetOps reviews

1,841 Views
1,638 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LiveNX

Read 10 LiveNX reviews

2,996 Views
2,247 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

LiveNX and DX NetOps compete in the network performance monitoring market. Based on data comparisons, DX NetOps generally has the upper hand due to its powerful features despite positive feedback for LiveNX’s pricing and support.

Features: LiveNX provides comprehensive network visualization, real-time network traffic analytics, and broader integration options. DX NetOps offers deep network insight, comprehensive reporting capabilities, and superior large-scale data handling features.

Room for Improvement: LiveNX needs to refine its scalability for larger enterprises, enhance its analytical depth, and improve its custom dashboard functionalities. DX NetOps could simplify its initial setup process, make its interface more intuitive, and provide better out-of-the-box integration solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveNX boasts a streamlined deployment model with proactive customer support, making it accessible for smaller teams. DX NetOps, while requiring a more complex initial setup, offers robust documentation and support for large enterprises needing detailed configurations.

Pricing and ROI: LiveNX is more cost-effective with a faster ROI, appealing to budget-conscious organizations seeking standard monitoring capabilities. DX NetOps, with a higher initial investment, justifies its cost with extensive features and scalability, offering significant long-term benefits for enterprises prioritizing detailed analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. LiveNX Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. LiveNX

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

37th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (18th)

LiveNX

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

34th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (40th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveNX is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
LiveNX	1.0%
DX NetOps	0.7%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments

DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Read full review

Ashwani Bansal

Senior Solution Consultant at Orange

Network management and diagnostics improved through effective monitoring and reporting capabilities

The solution is handy. I have not used that particular feature. Maintenance is required for the system. If you want to use something on the endpoints or end-user devices, then using LiveAction LiveNX in place of other tools would be quite beneficial. The solution impacts operational costs and resources. On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

"DX NetOps network monitoring and fault tolerance are the absolute best in the market, especially for the Indian market."

"The solution is stable."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

"Real-time insights through DX NetOps benefit diagnosing and resolving network issues since Spectrum has all sorts of details, but it lacks dashboards and a readable tabular format."

More DX NetOps pros

"There are many positive attributes, and it's the best of the best."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"LiveAction LiveNX provides valuable real-time and historical network traffic visualization capabilities that help monitor and analyze network performance."

"If you're looking for a tool that will solve your problems in a short period of time more effectively, LiveNX is the right tool."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

More LiveNX pros

Cons

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."

"I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

"DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly."

"DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

More DX NetOps cons

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"They need to create a more simplified UI."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

"The customer service and technical support of LiveAction LiveNX are rated at 4 out of 10."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions."

"The only downside to this software is the price; it's a very pricey solution and very expensive, and it requires a good amount of resources in terms of server memory."

More LiveNX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"We use the free version."

"It's very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?

I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The solution could be enhanced by implementing custom patterns for each customer.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

The customers use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management purposes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LiveAction LiveNX?

I work as an integrator with LiveAction LiveNX. Most customers prefer deploying it on premises rather than in the cloud. The advanced diagnostics capabilities, including flow-based surveillance and...

See all answers

Comparisons

WhatsUp Gold vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

LogicMonitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 6% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveNX

Compared 8% of the time

Nmap vs LiveNX

Compared 6% of the time

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs LiveNX

Compared 5% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveNX

Compared 5% of the time

ThousandEyes vs LiveNX

Compared 4% of the time

More LiveNX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

March 2026

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

LiveNX

March 2026

Download LiveNX product report

Also Known As

No data available

LiveNX

Overview

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

LiveNX enables real-time network monitoring with a graphical interface, offering detailed reports and advanced integration for comprehensive analysis and efficient network management.

LiveNX provides intuitive tools for real-time issue identification and resolution, leveraging advanced integration with platforms like Cisco SD-WAN to enhance network performance analysis. Through features such as visual analytics and QoS modeling, LiveNX supports capacity management planning and operational efficiency, although it requires improvements in pricing, resource efficiency, and web interface functionality. Users value its insights into traffic patterns, enabling optimization and proactive issue resolution.

What are the key features of LiveNX?

Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates immediate issue identification.
Graphical Interface: Enhances user experience with detailed visualization.
Integration Capabilities: Supports platforms like Cisco SD-WAN for comprehensive analysis.
Visual Analytics: Provides insights into traffic patterns.
QoS Modeling: Aids in planning and maintaining service quality.
Custom Templates: Offers personalized network management tools.

What benefits should users look for?

Proactive Issue Resolution: Enables early detection and solving of network problems.
Comprehensive Analysis: Assists in understanding and managing network performance.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances overall network management processes.
Traffic Optimization: Improves service quality and network utilization.

Industries use LiveNX to monitor and troubleshoot network performance, manage traffic, and ensure QoS across on-premises and cloud environments. It is particularly valued for its ability to visualize and optimize network traffic, which is crucial for maintaining service quality.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. LiveNX

March 2026

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. LiveNX

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. LiveNX report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.