Druva Phoenix vs HPE Zerto Software comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Druva and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Druva is ranked #23 with an average rating of 9.0, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0. Druva holds a 1.2% mindshare in CB, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Druva users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Druva Phoenix

Read 10 Druva Phoenix reviews

4,162 Views
2,580 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

Read 360 HPE Zerto Software reviews

25,432 Views
11,953 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Druva Phoenix

HPE Zerto Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

HPE Zerto Software and Druva Phoenix both compete in the realm of data management and disaster recovery. Druva Phoenix holds a significant edge in feature-rich environments, providing a more comprehensive solution for businesses with a cloud-centric approach.

Features: HPE Zerto Software offers continuous data protection, rapid recovery, and real-time ransomware detection, making it ideal for ensuring business continuity. Druva Phoenix excels in cloud integration, robust data governance, and global deduplication, delivering superior data retention and compliance management. These features cater particularly well to cloud-centric businesses.

Room for Improvement: HPE Zerto Software could enhance support for hypervisor level replication and SAN-based scenarios. Additionally, ensuring seamless analytics without relying on external solutions could improve user experience. Druva Phoenix might benefit from expanding its ransomware capabilities beyond VMs and improving AI-powered analytics to enhance backup efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Zerto Software offers streamlined deployment with robust support, perfect for rapid setup and continuous support needs. Druva Phoenix simplifies deployment with its cloud-native design, allowing quick integration and use even in complex environments. Both offer effective customer service, making user experience intuitive and supportive.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software provides efficient setup costs and solid ROI for businesses focused on maintaining business continuity. Druva Phoenix, despite higher initial costs, delivers better long-term value through extensive cloud features and global deduplication benefits, especially valuable in cloud infrastructures. Their pricing strategy is aligned with businesses seeking comprehensive solutions over mere cost savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Druva Phoenix vs. HPE Zerto Software Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Druva Phoenix vs. HPE Zerto Software

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,262 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Druva Phoenix

Ranking in Cloud Backup

23rd

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (8th), SaaS Backup (13th)

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Cloud Backup

2nd

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

1st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

360

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (1st), Autonomous Operational Resilience (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Druva Phoenix is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 2.5%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Zerto Software	2.5%
Druva Phoenix	1.2%
Other	96.3%

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

ZubeenAhmad

Sales Support Associate at Murdoch Webster

Cloud backup has reduced storage costs and now delivers fast, reliable data recovery

My overall experience in this field is seven years. The deployment model I have chosen for Druva Phoenix is mostly cloud-based backup. Government authorities and government customers majorly opt for on-premises deployment, but we have a very limited customer segment from that area. Druva Phoenix primarily operates on a private cloud, with some customers utilizing hybrid cloud solutions. If I assess the effectiveness of backup features in Druva Phoenix, particularly in minimizing operational disruptions, I would rate it as a very strong 9 or 9.5 on a scale of 10. I am not using Druva Data Security Cloud. My overall review rating for Druva Phoenix is 9.

Read full review

Aslah Faseel K

DevOps Engineer at a media company with 201-500 employees

Near-zero downtime has protected critical workloads and now simplifies hybrid cloud recovery

The best features of HPE Zerto Software are mainly very sophisticated and relevant to the current market. The data protection CDP part has real-time replication, unlike other solutions that have snapshot backups. We can set it up hourly, making it ideal for use with workloads. Another attraction is the near-zero RTO, with automated failover within minutes and one-click failover and failback. Currently, we are using a hybrid cloud solution, and HPE Zerto Software supports multi-cloud environments, making it easy to migrate between on-premises and cloud. Regarding the impact of HPE Zerto Software on our RTOs, we have near-zero RTO, meaning the system must be back online within thirty minutes if we measure the time. It is very quick to recover services. With HPE Zerto Software's near-synchronous replication, we have some CDP protection, so we typically write interceptions along with some asynchronous replication. There is almost real-time replication available.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's patch-based, so you don't have to bother about the backup server or the repository."

"One of the best features in Druva Phoenix for me personally is that it is an air-gapped environment, where you can keep cloud backup on a separate air-gapped environment and save from any kind of ransomware attack, and it is a ransomware safer environment because a customer gets a separate environment."

"Druva Phoenix provides a return on investment and operational cost reductions after implementation."

"The solution is great for companies that need backup capabilities."

"The best features of Druva Phoenix include comprehensive backup capabilities where you can back up your data with agent plus backup, deploy the proxy, and integrate your VMs to take your backup."

"I found the cost-effectiveness of Druva Phoenix to be its most valuable feature, especially when compared to on-premises backup solutions."

"We chose the best one that works for us which was Druva Phoenix."

"Once you set it up and you tell it exactly what needs to be backed up, you literally forget about it. It sends you emails and notifications of the current status of the jobs."

More Druva Phoenix pros

"HPE Zerto Software has helped tremendously with my organization's RTO and RPO, bringing it down to an hour rather than taking 12 hours to restore data the traditional way."

"The ease of adding additional servers is valuable. We have a portal that we can go into to add those new servers, and then outside of that, the overall time that it took for disaster recovery simulation is also good."

"There wasn't anything in place that compares to what we're getting from Zerto."

"The customer service and support are very good. Every time we have problems, they're ready to help us."

"We have had great success with the product; it is one of the very few products that we have recently used that literally had no issues and worked exactly as designed."

"The most valuable aspect of Zerto is synchronized replication, which is very useful."

"Zerto dramatically decreases the amount of time it takes to do a failover; I can essentially do it all by myself and I'm one person, and it allows me to restore our environment fully in a matter of seconds, literally."

"We have seen ROI. It reduced the time for failover and failback by 90%."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the reporting aspect of Druva Phoenix."

"They were very much responsive a few years back, but in the last one or two years, I believe the responsiveness has gone down."

"Druva Phoenix could be improved if they provided bare metal recovery for physical servers, which would be beneficial for server deployment."

"Druva Phoenix should include a few reporting features that it doesn't provide currently."

"Deploying it in a hybrid cloud model involves some minor complexities, though nothing represents a significant challenge."

"Although, sometimes there is a restriction with the number of OS platforms that this solution supports."

"Druva Phoenix is optimized to work with x86 platforms, making it unsuitable for backing up non-x86 architectures like AIX. The solution is primarily designed for physical Linux and Windows systems based on the x86 architecture, as well as virtualized Windows and Linux environments. However, if you have an AIX system, it cannot be deployed in the cloud, and therefore, backing it up in the cloud is not a concern."

"The ransomware features are limited in Druva. There's a lot of improvement needed. It should extend to Nutanix and Hyper-V. It should extend to Azure as well."

More Druva Phoenix cons

"Customer service and technical support need improvement."

"Zerto's price has room for improvement."

"We would love to have a native management pack for vROps and to be able to view a dashboard and metrics for BPGs within vROps. We would like to have a single view for monitoring and provide customers with dashboards so they can see their own BPGs."

"There should be more comprehensive cyber recovery capabilities."

"Physical servers would be a nice enhancement. I would also like to see the backup portion really enhanced further."

"I would give technical support a nine out of ten. I'm taking away a point because, at times, they send emails for me to read when I need something done immediately."

"The tech support on my latest issue wasn't so great. I had to figure a lot of stuff out myself. It could be that I had a Level 1 tech who was new or something, but it seemed like the tech was spitballing, which does not help me."

"Adding more features would be great, such as hardware version upgrades upon failover to the data centers and VM tools upgrades."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's very costly. Normal people wouldn't understand how their credits are calculated. It's pretty complex."

"We’ve had experience with the data center for a while and we have had solutions that were able to support older versions of the operating systems that we needed. I would like for Druva to support it as well."

"Druva Phoenix's pricing is based on the service provided, and it's reasonable. The cost of the service will depend on the size of your data and the number of virtual machines being backed up. However, the pricing structure is straightforward and easy to understand."

"I assume clients use Druva Phoenix because it is cheaper than other products."

"Zerto does a per-workload licensing model, per-server. It is simple and straightforward, but it is not super flexible. It is kind of a one size fits all. They charge the same price for those workloads. I feel like they could have some flexible licensing option possibly based on criticality, just so we could protect less important work. I would love to protect every workload in my environment with Zerto, whether I really need it or not, but the cost is such that I really have to justify that protection. So, if we had some more flexibility, e.g., you could protect servers with a two-, three-, or four-hour RPO at a certain price point versus mission-critical every five minutes, then I would be interested in that."

"It is less expensive than the full solution that we had previously, but at the same time, it's not an inexpensive product either."

"Zerto is not cheap but is an invaluable asset."

"The pricing is straightforward."

"Zerto is like a Ferrari. It's very fast but not the cheapest solution. You're paying a high price for quality and the assurance that you will have the environment up and steady."

"The licensing is a little bit steep, but there is some value that you do get for it as well."

"The pricing for this solution could be cheaper. They have two licensing tiers. When we purchased it, they didn't have a license for the cloud model. Certain things that I used to get with the basic licensing are no longer available. They are only available in the Cloud. Overall, the licensing model could be simplified."

"Price-wise, it works fine for me, but my budgetary team is always looking for ways to cut costs, and it seems like they first look at the data center and the IT side to find savings."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	94
Midsize Enterprise	93
Large Enterprise	207

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Druva Phoenix?

While Druva Phoenix is a good solution for a cloud-to-cloud environment, such as moving from AWS to another AWS, I see complexity when a customer wants to move from a physical environment or a phys...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Druva Phoenix?

Druva Phoenix is for server backups on cloud, which is the deployment model chosen by my customers. While Druva Phoenix is a good solution for a cloud-to-cloud environment, such as moving from AWS ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Druva Phoenix?

Many customers use Druva Phoenix's continuous data protection feature, but not for Phoenix. Not for Phoenix because Phoenix is server backups, and you generally do not keep continuous backup for se...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zerto?

HPE Zerto Software's GUI needs modernization to match the flexibility and user experience of other HPE software solutions, as there is still room for improvement in software-level flexibility and t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Druva inSync vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 7% of the time

N2W vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 4% of the time

Barracuda Email Gateway Defense (Barracuda Essentials) vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 4% of the time

More Druva Phoenix Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 7% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Druva Phoenix

September 2026

Download Druva Phoenix product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

September 2026

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Also Known As

CloudRanger

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

Druva Phoenix offers an easy-to-use, secure, and cost-effective cloud backup solution with simplified management and efficient data protection capabilities.

Druva Phoenix is designed for environments needing straightforward setup and automated off-site backups without on-premises requirements. It provides global deduplication, optimizing storage and costs while offering robust ransomware protection through air-gapped environments. Users value its easy integration with cloud providers like AWS, flexible retention options, and strong disaster recovery capabilities. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, support for diverse OS platforms, and more flexibility in backup locations. Concerns include its deployment in hybrid models and pricing for not-for-profits. Technical support responsiveness also needs improvement.

What are Druva Phoenix's key features?

Ease of Use: Quick setup with automated backups off-site.
Global Deduplication: Charges only for reduced data, optimizing costs.
Ransomware Protection: Air-gapped environments enhance security.
Cloud Integration: Seamless backup with AWS and cloud platforms.
Disaster Recovery: Strong capabilities within AWS infrastructure.

What benefits do users experience with Druva Phoenix?

Cost-Effectiveness: Reduced data charges decrease expenses.
Security: Enhanced ransomware protection and data security.
Efficiency: Simplified management without on-premises hardware.
Scalability: Facilitates data protection via cloud backup solutions.

Druva Phoenix is widely used for backing up virtual environments, physical servers, and SQL workloads. It supports Hyper-V, VMware, Nutanix, and Azure backups, particularly aiding clients in the pharmaceutical industry. By modernizing data backup, it eliminates hardware, secures data off-site, and integrates smoothly with AWS, addressing needs for local and AWS cloud backup. Despite some challenges in deployment from physical environments to cloud infrastructure, its use is prevalent among enterprises prioritizing data protection and management efficiency.

Druva

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

TRC Companies, Family Health Network, GulfMark Offshore, Pall Corporation

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Druva Phoenix vs. HPE Zerto Software

September 2026

Free Report: Druva Phoenix vs. HPE Zerto Software

Find out what your peers are saying about Druva Phoenix vs. HPE Zerto Software and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Druva Phoenix vs. HPE Zerto Software report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors, best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors, and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.