Domo vs FME comparison

Domo and Safe Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Domo is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.8, while Safe Software is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0. Domo holds a 0.7% mindshare in DI, compared to Safe Software’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Domo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Safe Software users who would recommend it.

Domo

Read 48 Domo reviews

9,253 Views
1,388 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

FME

Read 7 FME reviews

3,337 Views
2,569 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Domo

FME

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Domo and FME compete in data integration and analysis. Domo has the upper hand in analytics and visualization, while FME excels in data transformation and connectivity.

Features: Domo offers cloud-based accessibility, robust data visualization, and user-friendly dashboards. It supports using an extensive variety of data connectors, simplifying integration and data preparation. FME offers exceptional data interoperability and transformation tools, perfect for seamless integration across diverse systems. Its graphical user interface is a standout feature, facilitating the management of complex data environments.

Room for Improvement: Domo could improve its handling of massive datasets as well as expand its analytical tools for more advanced users. It also needs to offer more detailed customization options for data transformation processes. FME might benefit from a simpler initial setup process and enhanced user interface for non-technical users. It could also improve its cloud integration capabilities to better support modern deployment needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Domo provides cloud-based deployment with streamlined onboarding, focusing on ease of use and quick setup. It offers effective support to facilitate straightforward implementation. FME's deployment process might be slightly more complex, given its vast capabilities, but it provides specialized support and extensive documentation to help manage diverse data sources, catering to advanced setups.

Pricing and ROI: Domo’s pricing reflects its comprehensive analytics capabilities, delivering immediate analytical benefits, albeit at potentially higher upfront costs. FME, focusing on its versatile functionality, might require additional investment for full customization, which often results in significant ROI through optimized data workflows. Its long-term efficiency in handling complex data can lead to substantial cost savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Domo vs. FME Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Domo vs. FME

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Domo

Ranking in Data Integration

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (6th), Business Performance Management (7th), Reporting (4th), Data Visualization (7th)

FME

Ranking in Data Integration

32nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Domo is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FME is 1.0%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Domo	0.7%
FME	1.0%
Other	98.3%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Ruban Prasanna Dass SP

Assistant Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Have improved workflow efficiency through custom reports but encountered formatting limitations

The downsides of Domo are that we don't have a feature in the same column. When data comes in a time format, text format, and number format, we cannot segregate and create conditional formatting in that column. If in the future they develop this feature, it will benefit more users. Domo requires maintenance on my end, such as updates. I am maintaining some dashboards on a weekly basis and monthly basis daily reports. Because we need to upload in SFTP, we cannot schedule or auto-schedule due to rate purposes. We manually handle the data sets. If there were an option to reduce the cost, it would be easier to access.

Read full review

Gert Booysen

Software Solutions Leader at GE Vernova

Extensive format support and reliable integration enhance data management while new pricing model requires reassessment

I haven't had any input or requirements from any customers that are not currently covered, so I don't have any additional needs that were identified or raised to me. Regarding pricing, with the model changes that they've implemented a while back, it actually made it more expensive to use, especially on the server side. They changed the licensing model, and that made customers think it is overpriced. Some customers were actually looking at alternatives. Pricing with the model changes was perceived negatively. I work primarily with enterprise customers, Vodacom, Eskom, so it's tier-one customers. For small customers, this solution is a bit too expensive. They don't really use it and just do direct integration on smaller implementations. This is basically used by tier-one customers. FME is still able to save time and money for clients. It's still a good investment. Regarding similar products to FME, GE developed a product called Data Fabric. That is a real-time operational integration platform, Data Fabric Network Connect, which is a GE Grid OS product. It is actually more expensive than FME, but the purpose is different as it's operational. The vendor in this case is GE, and it's a company that we bought that used to be called Greenbird. In current use scenarios, FME is still leading compared to Data Fabric. The GE product has a different application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Domo is a local company, and I have found it to be rock solid."

"Over the last year we have saved about half of the amount of the subscription, it has reduced our costs more than we expected, it has saved us manpower, money, and made things more efficient."

"The solution is highly stable."

"The dashboarding itself was pretty easy. So both the front and the back end were positive in this case."

"Once the data source has been uploaded to Domo, making graphs is quite easy."

"The most ideal aspect about using Domo is it can accommodate a huge amount of data, and we loved the number of sources it provides in a single platform, such as the capability to connect it."

"The flexibility and usability are probably the best features, and I really appreciate what they're doing now with workflow and AI agents, allowing users to build that kind of agentic flow where data analytics and traditional ETL can quickly and easily embed AI capabilities, which is extremely powerful."

"Domo has positively impacted my organization by giving everyone the ability to see different data cards and make decisions quicker without relying on BI."

More Domo pros

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface."

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

"From my reseller perspective, the best features in FME are the ease of operation and the fact that it works."

"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."

"FME's features that I have found most valuable are that it has a very friendly user interface, you don't need to use a lot of code, it has a lot of connectors and few forms, and it has a strong facial aspect that can do a lot of facial analysis."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"FME is spatially aware and understands how to deal with the conversion of spatial objects and their attributes."

Cons

"I would like to see more flexibility in their pricing structure. The trend is moving from database pricing to a user-license pricing model. That would be a benefit if they wanted to reevaluate their pricing structure."

"I would also like to see improvements to their drag and drop Magic ETL tool. You can drag and drop your ETL tool, but it doesn't really work for a large amount of data. It struggles with that. In a real-world application, where you're working with 30 million rows or 100 million rows, it takes a bit longer to process the data. If you do it in the Redshift ETL tool, using your own code, it's much faster."

"I would like to see more flexibility in their pricing structure."

"The ETL way of storing is not up to mark. You have to rely on the naming convention that you're using in Domo because there are no folder systems where you can collate all your workflows and put them into separate folders. A folder system should be there so you can easily identify how you are working. Once you want to make some changes to your ETL, then you can see the whole lineage, identifying what is there and not there."

"One of the areas where we've had frustrations with Domo is the aesthetics."

"I would like to see more dashboard creation options."

"More functions on the ETL side for the drag and drop ETL."

"There are areas to improve on like visualization options, and there are areas I think would be valuable for Domo to explore, such as data governance, and providing sandbox or development instances, but updates are frequent and smooth, and the value of the tool in its simplicity and ability to drive user adoption far outweighs any missing visualization features."

More Domo cons

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

"FME is a great tool, but I don't know if we can scale it up since the prices are high and we would need to convince the decision makers to provide more budget."

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"Regarding pricing, with the model changes that they've implemented a while back, it actually made it more expensive to use, especially on the server side."

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"We are looking at the possibility of using Glue instead of FME, using the native AWS product."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not sure about pricing, but I believe Domo is quite costly. Prior to joining this organization, I had a Domo license with my former employer and I think that license was around $500 to $600 annually. That was for a single license. I think it varies, depending on the organization that is acquiring Domo."

"The price that they offered was around $200 per user license. It was pretty cheap at that time compared to other companies. I think they have revamped their pricing structure since then."

"Domo is slightly costly but it's much cheaper than some."

"For about 100 users our cost is $95,800."

"The solution is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"They've built an "app economy." Some of them are really expensive, so they're not for startups and smaller companies. They're more like enterprise tools. We couldn't afford some of them, because they were so crazy expensive. But if I was working for a bank, insurance company, or some bigger corporation then, for sure, you could justify those prices... It was silly expensive back then and it probably still is, or even more expensive."

"Because it's software as a service, it's more expensive on the face of it. But there are a lot of variables. I don't have to pay for servers or for infrastructure. I don't have to pay labor for my IT organization to set up or maintain the environment. I don't have to pay for them to upgrade the software, and test it, etc., because when it rolls out, it is transparent and seamless for us. But, because of that, it costs more, I imagine, than Sisense, or Yellowfin, or Power BI. A lot of those make it sound like they're inexpensive, but when you add in all the hidden costs and all of the overhead, it's probably comparable."

"It started out at about $600 a seat. However, then as we started to grow, it scaled that down to about $330 or 3$50 a seat, if I'm not mistaken."

More Domo pricing and cost advice

"The product's price is reasonable."

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Comms Service Provider

Government

27%

Energy/Utilities Company

12%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Domo?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that there was very little.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Domo?

I'm not sure how Domo can be improved overall, as it's a really good experience.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Domo?

My main use case for Domo involves building different tables and different cards so I can look at different data points. A quick specific example of a table I have built or a data point I often loo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FME?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FME?

The use cases for FME are mainly integration to the GE Smallworld product. GE Smallworld is a GE product, and we are using it to integrate with other third-party products into GE Smallworld and ADM...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering FME?

The overall rating for FME is eight out of ten, and I prefer the feedback to be anonymous. My job title is Senior Solutions Architect.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tableau Enterprise vs Domo

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Domo

Compared 20% of the time

QlikView vs Domo

Compared 2% of the time

Qlik Sense vs Domo

Compared 2% of the time

Google Data Studio vs Domo

Compared 2% of the time

More Domo Competitors

SSIS vs FME

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 7% of the time

Ikon vs FME

Compared 5% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs FME

Compared 4% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs FME

Compared 4% of the time

More FME Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Domo

June 2026

Download Domo product report

Buyer's Guide

FME

June 2026

Download FME product report

Also Known As

corda

No data available

Overview

Domo provides self-service BI, enabling users to generate reports without needing a data warehouse. Its cloud-based nature enhances accessibility and performance, while offering customizable dashboards for data-driven decision-making.

Domo stands out for its robust data integration, featuring Magic ETL to streamline processes. Its AI-driven insights, extensive data connectors, and collaboration tools promote secure sharing and analytical proficiency. Although users note room for improvement in visualization, pricing, and data integration, its capabilities in generating executive dashboards and unified analytics remain prominent. Performance and user experience enhancements are desired, including improved support for large data volumes and richer data transformation tools.

What are the key features of Domo?

Self-Service BI: Generate reports without a data warehouse for simplified analysis.
Data Integration: Leverage Magic ETL for easy data management.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor dashboards to specific needs.
AI-Driven Insights: Gain automated insights for better decision-making.
Extensive Data Connectors: Access a wide range of data sources.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Domo?

Accessibility: Cloud-based structure ensures data access anywhere.
Performance: Enhanced performance with seamless data processing.
Collaboration: Facilitate secure sharing and collaboration for collective insights.
Decision-Making: Enable data-driven decisions with real-time analytics.

In industries like finance, marketing, project management, and retail, organizations use Domo for crafting executive dashboards, integrating data sources, and conducting advanced analytics. Its capabilities allow them to transform data into insightful dashboards, aiding in performance tracking and actionable insights.

Domo

FME is a powerful tool designed for efficient geospatial data handling, supporting over 400 file formats and integrating with diverse systems. Its intuitive interface facilitates seamless automation of workflows, making it ideal for sectors that manage large spatial data volumes.

With FME, businesses automate data flows and manage GIS data transfers while integrating with tools like GE Smallworld. It empowers users with self-service capabilities for data processing and real-time event management. Despite its strengths, users note areas for improvement such as better mapping presentations, simpler loops, and more guidance on geographical transformations. Pricing remains a consideration for some markets. However, FME is a robust solution for massive data transformations, network infrastructure management, and automation of data quality control, especially in governmental contexts.

What are FME's key features?

Spatial Capabilities: Efficient handling of geospatial data through triggers and automation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with FME Flow, FME Form, and scripting languages like Python.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies data transformation and debugging without extensive coding.
Format Support: Over 400 file formats ensure wide-ranging compatibility.
System Integration: Connects with numerous systems, preferred for large spatial data volumes.

What benefits should users consider?

Automation: Streamlines workflows and reduces manual intervention.
Efficiency: Handles large datasets effectively, optimizing data operations.
Cost-Effectiveness: Despite pricing concerns, offers significant functionality for data processing.
Self-Service Capabilities: Enables users to manage and transform data independently.
Real-Time Processing: Supports real-time event handling for dynamic environments.

FME is widely adopted across industries that require precise geospatial data management such as government agencies needing to automate and control data processes efficiently or organizations handling complex network infrastructures that engage in frequent GIS data transfers. Its capacity for seamless integration with various systems enables practical use for extensive data transformations and automation, increasing operational efficiency in data-intensive sectors.

Safe Software

Sample Customers

Capco, SABMiller, Stance, eBay, Sage North America, Goodwill Industries of Central Indiana, Telus, The Cliffs, OGIO International Inc., and many more!

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

Buyer's Guide

Domo vs. FME

June 2026

Free Report: Domo vs. FME

Find out what your peers are saying about Domo vs. FME and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Domo vs. FME report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.