Dify vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service comparison

Dify and Oracle are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Dify is ranked #29 with an average rating of 6.0, while Oracle is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5. Dify holds a 0.5% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Oracle’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Dify users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Dify

Read 2 Dify reviews

1,010 Views
192 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Read 6 Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service reviews

1,472 Views
942 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Dify

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and Dify are products competing in app development solutions. Dify appears to have the upper hand due to its innovative feature set and flexibility, appealing to customers who prioritize advanced development capabilities.

Features: Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers seamless integration with Oracle Cloud applications, a low-code development environment, and enterprise-level scalability. Its security compliance adds value for businesses utilizing Oracle's ecosystem. Dify provides modern tooling, adaptability, and unique customization options, supporting a wide range of programming languages, thus appealing to developers seeking innovation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service provides a cohesive deployment process optimized for Oracle ecosystems with comprehensive customer support. Dify offers a flexible deployment model that suits diverse IT environments and responsive technical assistance, making it preferable for businesses requiring versatility and easier integration.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is cost-effective within Oracle's ecosystem, promising a favorable ROI for Oracle-invested businesses. Dify's competitive pricing and impressive ROI make it appealing to companies seeking flexibility at a reasonable cost. Dify's cost-benefit ratio attracts a broader audience beyond Oracle users.

To learn more, read our detailed Low-Code Development Platforms Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dify

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

29th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (199th)

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Dify is 0.5%. The mindshare of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is 1.8%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service	1.8%
Dify	0.5%
Other	97.7%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Rusira Sathnindu

Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Visual workflows have accelerated our agent POC while better UI and observability still need work

My personal experience with Dify's UI is that it is not my favorite, as it can be improved a little bit, and sometimes the UI feels a little bit buggy. I am not sure if that is because it was a self-hosted version. The documentation can also be improved a little bit more. I think not a lot of people are using Dify currently, so that is why the documentation is not very great. If the documentation was improved, that would also be a really good thing. Currently, Dify could improve by offering better observability like other platforms. We currently use OpenAI Agents SDK, which requires you to build everything by code, but the observability is really good. It has OpenAI Traces, and you can basically trace everything for a conversation. If Dify had that kind of tracing functionality, that would be great.

Read full review

Sherif Bashar

Head of Digital Solutions at Wind Integrated Solutions

Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day

There are very minor things, like the feature called "action chains," that could use a bit of enhancement. But the team is perfect; they're working on it. An action chain is a sequence of actions triggered by a button or an event. It executes code in order, from top to bottom. For example, it could call a code, call a REST service, and then insert data into a database. It needs enhancement because it can be a bit complex for fresh grads or new developers to understand. It would be better if it was made more readable. That's the main point. But if you have experience, you'll understand it easily. One more thing I want to add about Visual Builder: up until two years ago, it supported native mobile development. That's not available anymore. They replaced native mobile development with progressive web apps, and most customers are complaining about that. We need native mobile development back – the ability to put apps on stores like Google Play or the App Store. That feature is not available right now, and they deprecated it starting in 2024. It's very important. Otherwise, clients go with Flutter or other mobile development tools. It would be good for Oracle to regain that capability. We need the native mobile development feature back.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using Dify has positively impacted our organization because we were able to cut down on some development time and do a lot of testing in a very small time period."

"Dify has positively impacted the organization because accuracy has been improved, and the time and complexity in flows that were manual are now automated, from HR automation to ERP level transactions, including subscription management in the SaaS application, monitoring, and analytics."

"Using Dify has positively impacted our organization because we were able to cut down on some development time and do a lot of testing in a very small time period."

"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

"The initial setup is easy."

"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."

"The tool is very easy to use."

"You can avoid costly React developers that are required for building advanced UI."

"The action chains are really helpful, and the trigger event, along with those action chains, has been very helpful."

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

Cons

"One of the main concerns that we had is that it might not be very scalable because we are hosting it in a self-hosted environment, and we have to configure the architecture and everything."

"The only improvement would be if Dify provided an SMTP server that could be connected to automate Dify workflow management, as that would be a great option."

"My honest opinion is: do not use this solution — there are plenty of free options out there that will do the trick."

"There are some bugs in VBCS."

"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."

"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."

"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."

"If you're doing some, for example, extremely responsive applications for the web, it's not as good."

"The tool has minor bugs."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."

"It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

23%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

11%

Healthcare Company

10%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

The tool is very easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

I actually don't have much experience with pricing, so I can't comment on it right now.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

There was a requirement to build a custom form to raise AI invoices, using Oracle Fusion. We created a form, and another use case was that users wanted to create and update customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

n8n vs Dify

Compared 34% of the time

Letta vs Dify

Compared 15% of the time

UiPath Studio vs Dify

Compared 10% of the time

Pulse Elasticsearch and OpenSearch vs Dify

Compared 9% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Dify

Compared 8% of the time

More Dify Competitors

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

Studio Creatio vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 7% of the time

MATS vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

March 2026

Download Dify product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

March 2026

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service product report

Overview

Dify provides seamless integration and innovative features that optimize business processes for enhanced productivity. Its user-friendly design accommodates diverse use cases, making it a versatile choice for organizations seeking efficiency.

Dify revolutionizes workflow management with its intuitive platform. Designed with adaptability in mind, it serves businesses across industries by streamlining operations and facilitating collaboration. Dify's ecosystem allows for the integration of different tools, enhancing productivity and reducing the need for multiple systems. By offering a centralized hub for task management, it helps teams achieve their goals with relative ease and efficiency.

What are the key features of Dify?

Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with existing tools to enhance workflow efficiency.
Customization Options: Tailor features to meet specific business requirements.
Analytics Dashboard: Provides insightful data analysis for informed decision-making.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing business demands without disruptions.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances team interactions and project management.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in Dify reviews?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined processes lead to time-saving and efficient task completion.
Cost-Effective: Reduces the need for multiple software investments.
Enhanced Collaboration: Improves communication and teamwork across departments.
Data-Driven Insights: Offers analytics that guide strategic decisions.
Adaptability: Supports evolving business needs with minimal hassle.

Dify's implementation strategy varies across industries. In retail, it connects inventory management systems to improve accuracy and reduce waste. In healthcare, it streamlines patient data processes for better caregiving. In manufacturing, it's used to optimize supply chain logistics, cutting down on lead times and boosting efficiency.

Dify

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is a cloud-based software development Platform as a Service (PaaS) and a hosted environment for your application development infrastructure. It provides an open-source standards-based solution to develop, collaborate on, and deploy applications within Oracle Cloud.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OutSystems, Mendix and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.