Devo vs LogRhythm Axon [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and Exabeam are both solutions in the Log Management category. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Exabeam users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 28 Devo reviews

7,893 Views
4,025 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

LogRhythm Axon [EOL]

Read 3 LogRhythm Axon [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Devo

LogRhythm Axon [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

Devo and LogRhythm Axon [EOL] compete in the security information and event management space focusing on data analysis and threat detection. Devo has an advantage in pricing and support, while LogRhythm Axon [EOL] offers superior features for specific scenarios.

Features: Devo offers fast data search, real-time threat detection, and user-friendly analytics. It also provides high-scale data ingestion to enhance security operations. LogRhythm Axon [EOL] includes comprehensive automation, advanced correlation capabilities, and robust integration features, making it a highly adaptable tool.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo provides a streamlined deployment process with minimal setup time. It is supported by reliable customer service ensuring smooth operations. LogRhythm Axon [EOL] involves a more complex deployment process but offers in-depth service and training for adopting its extensive capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: Devo presents lower setup costs and offers a strong return on investment due to efficient resource usage and scalability. LogRhythm Axon [EOL] has a higher initial cost but provides substantial ROI with its extensive feature-packed ecosystem.

To learn more, read our detailed Log Management Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 918,169 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (17th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (16th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (16th)

LogRhythm Axon [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

AshishDubey

Product manager at Tata Communications Ltd

A tool that offers features like SOAR and UBA, along with an out-of-the-box connector for users

LogRhythm Axon has come up with the AI cloud concept in the market. When it comes to the AI cloud concept, you need to consider that every region has differences when it comes to data sovereignty. The AI cloud concept from LogRhythm Axon was based on real-time AI and ML concepts, along with analytics parts that were carried out. The AI cloud concept from LogRhythm Axon is not something that is available in India, so I want it to be introduced in India soon with data sovereignty compliance in place. LogRhythm should focus more on Axon and its cloud platform, which can be helpful in the future to compete with players like Sentinel and Splunk, which currently offer cloud models to users. With LogRhythm Axon, stability and support are areas with shortcomings where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ROI has been great as we could launch it in a few months instead of a couple of years, and when you put all the costs together, it is less to have done it than with the open source approach."

"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

"Scalability is one of Devo's strengths."

"When we show the people who are in charge of getting funding that we saved this number of man-hours, which correlates to this number of dollars, they're more willing to fight to get that funding for the next fiscal year."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"The querying and the log-retention capabilities are pretty powerful. Those provide some of the biggest value-add for us."

"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."

More Devo pros

"Scalability-wise, LogRhythm Axon is a good product."

"For me, the most valuable feature of LogRhythm AXON is the log parsing technology it has. With my company, I'm the current policy builder, so not having to know an archaic, cryptic format and being able to visually grab a log and assign an element to a particular meta tag quickly and easily and being able to run tests on that have been super useful. It's going to revolutionize the way the logs are identified and classified."

"The search feature within Axon is pretty robust; it's actually very fast in comparison to the previous platform and is going to exponentially help the investigation times for the SOC analysts and for just pulling logs and getting data."

"The fact that your investigations can be saved into a single query string that you can copy and share with your teammates is going to be a game changer."

Cons

"The cost is a little higher compared to other tools such as DataDog or Elasticsearch, so they could work on reducing costs."

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement."

"Technical support needs to be more direct. For example, when we submit a ticket, the support team will delegate a task to the operations team, for example, or various other teams."

"The price is one problem with Devo."

"In terms of return on investment with Devo, I'd say it has been costly due to the need for support and the overtime required for issues experienced at the beginning of the project."

"There are some issues from an availability and functionality standpoint, meaning the tool is somewhat slow. There were some slow response periods over the past six to nine months, though it has yet to impact us terribly as we are a relatively small shop. We've noticed it, however, so Devo could improve the responsiveness."

"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."

More Devo cons

"It's a very beta solution right now, and there are so many features that we would like to see added in, such as integration with Active Directory, which is essential for user management and for streamlining that process significantly."

"I'd give technical support a five out of ten. There are definitely areas that they can improve upon, and faster response times would be wonderful, and having more knowledgeable staff who provide the support would also be great."

"With LogRhythm Axon, stability and support are areas with shortcomings where improvements are required."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"I know that there are certain payments to be made towards the licensing costs attached to the product...The pricing of LogRhythm Axon falls under the mid-range, in my opinion."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

918,169 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

LogRhythm SIEM vs LogRhythm Axon [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

LevelBlue USM Anywhere vs LogRhythm Axon [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

ManageEngine Log360 vs LogRhythm Axon [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Elastic Observability vs LogRhythm Axon [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs LogRhythm Axon [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More LogRhythm Axon [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

October 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm Axon [EOL]

October 2026

Download LogRhythm Axon [EOL] product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

LogRhythm Axon [EOL] provided a comprehensive solution for IT security, enabling organizations to centralize log data collection and enhance threat detection capabilities. It streamlined security operations with advanced analytics and automated responses.

Designed for effective threat management, LogRhythm Axon [EOL] integrated seamlessly into security environments, offering robust analytics and incident response features. It allowed organizations to automate processes and improve security posture with real-time monitoring and alerts. Its architecture provided flexible threat intelligence and unified threat visibility across all networks.

What are the key features of LogRhythm Axon [EOL]?

Advanced Analytics: Delivers deep insights into potential threats and network vulnerabilities.
Automated Response: Streamlines incident management by automating responses to detected threats.
Centralized Log Management: Consolidates log data from diverse sources for efficient monitoring.
Real-time Monitoring: Provides continuous oversight to quickly identify and neutralize threats.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Threat Detection: Improves identification of potential security threats.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual intervention with automation features.
Cost-effectiveness: Minimizes financial impact by preventing breaches.
Scalability: Accommodates growing security needs without significant redevelopment.

In financial industries, LogRhythm Axon [EOL] assisted in maintaining regulatory compliance through comprehensive logging and reporting capabilities. Healthcare organizations found it valuable for protecting sensitive patient data with its robust threat detection features. Its deployment across these sectors showcased adaptability across security infrastructures.

Exabeam

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Cribl and others in Log Management. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

918,169 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.