No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Devo vs Graylog Security comparison

Devo and Graylog are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Graylog is ranked #61. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Graylog’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Graylog users who would recommend it.
Devo
Read 26 Devo reviews
  • 6,972 Views
  • 3,835 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Graylog Security
Read 2 Graylog Security reviews
  • 1,710 Views
  • 1,471 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Devo and Graylog Security offer robust security solutions, yet they excel in different areas based on user reviews. Users are happier with Devo's pricing and support, while Graylog Security is preferred for its features.

Features: Users value Devo for its comprehensive analytics, customizable alerting capabilities, and actionable insights. Graylog Security is preferred for its log management efficiency, real-time threat detection, and flexible data storage options.

Room for Improvement: Devo users suggest enhancements in report generation, interface intuitiveness, and greater integration capabilities. Graylog Security users desire better scalability, improved integration options, and a more user-friendly setup process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Graylog Security is appreciated for its versatile deployment options but receives mixed reviews on customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Devo users find the setup cost to be reasonable and experience satisfactory ROI. Graylog Security users express concerns about the initial setup cost but report good ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Graylog Security Report (Updated: June 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Devo vs. Graylog Security
June 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Devo
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
18th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (18th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (13th)
Graylog Security
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
61st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Graylog Security is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Devo1.2%
Graylog Security0.5%
Other98.3%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Usama Khan
Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response
Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.
Read full review
Tony Zafiropoulos - PeerSpot reviewer
Tony Zafiropoulos
Owner/ Chief Engineer at Fixvirus.com
Aggregates logs in one place and helps to review data points
We tried Graylog Security, starting with their inexpensive open-source version. We tested it out and continued using it for a while. As for the main differences between Graylog Security and other vendors, some users might prefer cloud-based platforms over on-premises solutions. It isn't inherently cloud-native, but that might not matter much for some.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."
"The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean."
"The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."
"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."
"But from a SaaS standpoint, if not best-in-breed, Devo is certainly in the top-two or top-three."
"Devo provides a multi-tenant, cloud-native architecture. This is critical for managed service provider environments or multinational organizations who may have subsidiaries globally. It gives organizations a way to consolidate their data in a single accessible location, yet keep the data separate. This allows for global views and/or isolated views restricted by access controls by company or business unit."
"Scalability is one of Devo's strengths."
"Devo has improved our visibility, log management efficiency, and investigation capabilities positively."
More Devo pros
"The tool aggregates logs. We can see the logs in one place."
"We use the solution to collect logs."
 

Cons

"Technical support could be better."
"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."
"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel."
"There are some issues from an availability and functionality standpoint, meaning the tool is somewhat slow. There were some slow response periods over the past six to nine months, though it has yet to impact us terribly as we are a relatively small shop. We've noticed it, however, so Devo could improve the responsiveness."
"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."
"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring."
"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."
"It's stable but it's not extremely stable."
More Devo cons
"Graylog Security needs to incorporate security scorecards."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."
"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."
"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."
"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."
"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."
"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."
"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."
"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."
More Devo pricing and cost advice
"I rate the tool's pricing a one out of ten."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
14%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Construction Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?
The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Devo?
Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Devo?
I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo
Compared 8% of the time
LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo
Compared 7% of the time
New Relic vs Devo Logo
New Relic vs Devo
Compared 4% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Devo Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Devo
Compared 3% of the time
Datadog vs Devo Logo
Datadog vs Devo
Compared 3% of the time
More Devo Competitors
Wazuh vs Graylog Security Logo
Wazuh vs Graylog Security
Compared 27% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Graylog Security Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Graylog Security
Compared 19% of the time
Logpoint vs Graylog Security Logo
Logpoint vs Graylog Security
Compared 13% of the time
Elastic Security vs Graylog Security Logo
Elastic Security vs Graylog Security
Compared 6% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Graylog Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Graylog Security
Compared 4% of the time
More Graylog Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Devo
August 2026
Devo reportDownload Devo product report
Buyer's Guide
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
August 2026
Graylog Security reportDownload Graylog Security product report
 

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?
  • Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
  • High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
  • Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
  • Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
  • Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
  • Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.
What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?
  • Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
  • Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
  • Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
  • Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
  • Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Graylog Security is designed for log management and analysis, assisting in monitoring security events, detecting threats, providing real-time alerts, and aiding troubleshooting and forensic investigations. Its scalability and customizable dashboards support IT departments in maintaining system performance and ensuring compliance.

With exceptional log management capabilities and powerful search functions, Graylog Security is reliable for threat hunting, integrating with other tools, and offering a user-friendly dashboard. Organizations value it for quickly analyzing large datasets and providing detailed insights into security events. However, better documentation and clearer instructions for new users, more efficient alerting capabilities, easier scaling, and enhanced support options could improve user satisfaction.

What are the most important features of Graylog Security?
  • Log Management: Efficiently handle and analyze extensive log data.
  • Scalability: Adapt to growing data volumes with ease.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Create tailored dashboards for specific needs.
  • Real-Time Alerting: Receive instant notifications on security events.
  • Threat Hunting: Conduct detailed threat analyses and investigations.
  • Flexible Integrations: Seamlessly connect with other security tools.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Navigate and manage with ease.
What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews when evaluating Graylog Security?
  • Improved Threat Detection: Enhanced ability to identify and respond to threats.
  • Operational Efficiency: Streamlined log management and analytics processes.
  • Scalability: Accommodate growing data needs without performance decline.
  • Customizability: Tailor features and dashboards to specific requirements.
  • Compliance: Maintain and prove regulatory compliance.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Benefit from efficient resource use and reduced manual efforts.
  • Enhanced Support: Consideration for responsive and helpful support services.

Graylog Security is implemented across diverse industries, including healthcare for patient data protection, finance for transaction monitoring and fraud detection, and retail for safeguarding customer information. Each industry leverages its detailed analytics and real-time alerting to meet specific regulatory and operational standards, ensuring a secure and compliant environment.

Graylog
 

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Devo vs. Graylog Security
June 2026
Free Report: Devo vs. Graylog Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Graylog Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Devo vs. Graylog Security report.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.