Devo vs Graylog Security comparison

Devo and Graylog are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Graylog is ranked #61. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Graylog’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Graylog users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 26 Devo reviews

6,972 Views
3,835 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Graylog Security

Read 2 Graylog Security reviews

1,710 Views
1,471 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Graylog Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Devo and Graylog Security offer robust security solutions, yet they excel in different areas based on user reviews. Users are happier with Devo's pricing and support, while Graylog Security is preferred for its features.

Features: Users value Devo for its comprehensive analytics, customizable alerting capabilities, and actionable insights. Graylog Security is preferred for its log management efficiency, real-time threat detection, and flexible data storage options.

Room for Improvement: Devo users suggest enhancements in report generation, interface intuitiveness, and greater integration capabilities. Graylog Security users desire better scalability, improved integration options, and a more user-friendly setup process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Graylog Security is appreciated for its versatile deployment options but receives mixed reviews on customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Devo users find the setup cost to be reasonable and experience satisfactory ROI. Graylog Security users express concerns about the initial setup cost but report good ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Graylog Security Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Graylog Security

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (18th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (13th)

Graylog Security

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

61st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Graylog Security is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.2%
Graylog Security	0.5%
Other	98.3%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Tony Zafiropoulos

Owner/ Chief Engineer at Fixvirus.com

Aggregates logs in one place and helps to review data points

We tried Graylog Security, starting with their inexpensive open-source version. We tested it out and continued using it for a while. As for the main differences between Graylog Security and other vendors, some users might prefer cloud-based platforms over on-premises solutions. It isn't inherently cloud-native, but that might not matter much for some.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The querying and the log-retention capabilities are pretty powerful. Those provide some of the biggest value-add for us."

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them."

"It's a core tool for us in looking at logs, because logs are the starting point in any investigation, so leveraging Devo from start to finish in any investigation is basically what we do."

"The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"But from a SaaS standpoint, if not best-in-breed, Devo is certainly in the top-two or top-three."

"Having one integrated tool helped us by removing the multiple teams, multiple pieces of equipment, and multiple software solutions from the equation."

"The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."

More Devo pros

"We use the solution to collect logs."

"The tool aggregates logs. We can see the logs in one place."

Cons

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement."

"The overall performance of extraction could be a lot faster, but that's a common problem in this space in general. Also, the stock or default alerting and detecting options could definitely be broader and more all-encompassing. The fact that they're not is why we had to write all our own alerts."

"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."

"There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. I would go as far as to say the product is deficient in its ability to parse multiple, different log types, including logs from major vendors that are supported by competitors. Additionally, the time that it takes to turn around a supported parser for customers and common log source types, which are generally accepted standards in the industry, is not acceptable. This has impacted customer onboarding and customer relationships for us on multiple fronts."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring. They're working on integrations with different types of systems, but that integration needs to go beyond just onboarding to the platform. It needs to include applications, out-of-the-box, that immediately help people to start monitoring their systems. Such applications would include dashboards and alerts, and then people could customize them for their own needs so that they aren't starting from a blank slate."

More Devo cons

"Graylog Security needs to incorporate security scorecards."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"I rate the tool's pricing a one out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Retailer

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Wazuh vs Graylog Security

Compared 27% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Graylog Security

Compared 18% of the time

Logpoint vs Graylog Security

Compared 14% of the time

Elastic Security vs Graylog Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Graylog Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

August 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

August 2026

Download Graylog Security product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Graylog Security is designed for log management and analysis, assisting in monitoring security events, detecting threats, providing real-time alerts, and aiding troubleshooting and forensic investigations. Its scalability and customizable dashboards support IT departments in maintaining system performance and ensuring compliance.

With exceptional log management capabilities and powerful search functions, Graylog Security is reliable for threat hunting, integrating with other tools, and offering a user-friendly dashboard. Organizations value it for quickly analyzing large datasets and providing detailed insights into security events. However, better documentation and clearer instructions for new users, more efficient alerting capabilities, easier scaling, and enhanced support options could improve user satisfaction.

What are the most important features of Graylog Security?

Log Management: Efficiently handle and analyze extensive log data.
Scalability: Adapt to growing data volumes with ease.
Customizable Dashboards: Create tailored dashboards for specific needs.
Real-Time Alerting: Receive instant notifications on security events.
Threat Hunting: Conduct detailed threat analyses and investigations.
Flexible Integrations: Seamlessly connect with other security tools.
User-Friendly Interface: Navigate and manage with ease.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews when evaluating Graylog Security?

Improved Threat Detection: Enhanced ability to identify and respond to threats.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlined log management and analytics processes.
Scalability: Accommodate growing data needs without performance decline.
Customizability: Tailor features and dashboards to specific requirements.
Compliance: Maintain and prove regulatory compliance.
Cost-Effectiveness: Benefit from efficient resource use and reduced manual efforts.
Enhanced Support: Consideration for responsive and helpful support services.

Graylog Security is implemented across diverse industries, including healthcare for patient data protection, finance for transaction monitoring and fraud detection, and retail for safeguarding customer information. Each industry leverages its detailed analytics and real-time alerting to meet specific regulatory and operational standards, ensuring a secure and compliant environment.

Graylog

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Graylog Security

August 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Graylog Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Graylog Security and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Graylog Security report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.