Devo vs Graylog Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and Graylog are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.2, while Graylog is ranked #60. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Graylog’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Graylog users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 27 Devo reviews

7,893 Views
4,262 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Graylog Security

Read 2 Graylog Security reviews

1,987 Views
1,689 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Graylog Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Devo and Graylog Security offer robust security solutions, yet they excel in different areas based on user reviews. Users are happier with Devo's pricing and support, while Graylog Security is preferred for its features.

Features: Users value Devo for its comprehensive analytics, customizable alerting capabilities, and actionable insights. Graylog Security is preferred for its log management efficiency, real-time threat detection, and flexible data storage options.

Room for Improvement: Devo users suggest enhancements in report generation, interface intuitiveness, and greater integration capabilities. Graylog Security users desire better scalability, improved integration options, and a more user-friendly setup process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Graylog Security is appreciated for its versatile deployment options but receives mixed reviews on customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Devo users find the setup cost to be reasonable and experience satisfactory ROI. Graylog Security users express concerns about the initial setup cost but report good ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Graylog Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Graylog Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (17th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (16th)

Graylog Security

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

60th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Graylog Security is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.2%
Graylog Security	0.6%
Other	98.2%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Tony Zafiropoulos

Owner/ Chief Engineer at Fixvirus.com

Aggregates logs in one place and helps to review data points

We tried Graylog Security, starting with their inexpensive open-source version. We tested it out and continued using it for a while. As for the main differences between Graylog Security and other vendors, some users might prefer cloud-based platforms over on-premises solutions. It isn't inherently cloud-native, but that might not matter much for some.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most powerful feature is the way the data is stored and extracted. The data is always stored in its original format and you can normalize the data after it has been stored."

"One of the immediate improvements that come to mind is the amount of hot, searchable data, as in the SIEM we had before we were only able to search back 90 days of hot, searchable data, whereas here we have 400 days worth, which has definitely improved our threat hunting capabilities."

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them."

"The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."

"With Devo, we can eliminate swivel chair analysis among tools for a streamlined workflow that gives us the most direct path to the root cause."

"Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo."

"Devo provides a multi-tenant, cloud-native architecture. This is critical for managed service provider environments or multinational organizations who may have subsidiaries globally. It gives organizations a way to consolidate their data in a single accessible location, yet keep the data separate. This allows for global views and/or isolated views restricted by access controls by company or business unit."

"More than anything, we have seen ROI in the amount of time saved during investigations."

More Devo pros

"The tool aggregates logs. We can see the logs in one place."

"We use the solution to collect logs."

Cons

"The cost is a little higher compared to other tools such as DataDog or Elasticsearch, so they could work on reducing costs."

"An admin who is trying to audit user activity usually cannot go beyond a day in the UI. I would like to have access to pages and pages of that data, going back as far as the storage we have, so I could look at every command or search or deletion or anything that a user has run. As an admin, that would really help. Going back just a day in the UI is not going to help, and that means I have to find a different way to do that."

"Technical support needs to be more direct. For example, when we submit a ticket, the support team will delegate a task to the operations team, for example, or various other teams."

"They can improve their AI capabilities"

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there."

"From our experience, the Devo agent needs some work. They built it on top of OS Query's open-source framework. It seems like it wasn't tuned properly to handle a large volume of Windows event logs. In our experience, there would definitely be some room for improvement. A lot of SIEMs on the market have their own agent infrastructure. I think Devo's working towards that, but I think that it needs some improvement as far as keeping up with high-volume environments."

"The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities."

More Devo cons

"Graylog Security needs to incorporate security scorecards."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"I rate the tool's pricing a one out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Educational Organization

14%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Wazuh vs Graylog Security

Compared 25% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Graylog Security

Compared 15% of the time

Logpoint vs Graylog Security

Compared 13% of the time

Elastic Security vs Graylog Security

Compared 5% of the time

More Graylog Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

September 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

September 2026

Download Graylog Security product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Graylog Security is designed for log management and analysis, assisting in monitoring security events, detecting threats, providing real-time alerts, and aiding troubleshooting and forensic investigations. Its scalability and customizable dashboards support IT departments in maintaining system performance and ensuring compliance.

With exceptional log management capabilities and powerful search functions, Graylog Security is reliable for threat hunting, integrating with other tools, and offering a user-friendly dashboard. Organizations value it for quickly analyzing large datasets and providing detailed insights into security events. However, better documentation and clearer instructions for new users, more efficient alerting capabilities, easier scaling, and enhanced support options could improve user satisfaction.

What are the most important features of Graylog Security?

Log Management: Efficiently handle and analyze extensive log data.
Scalability: Adapt to growing data volumes with ease.
Customizable Dashboards: Create tailored dashboards for specific needs.
Real-Time Alerting: Receive instant notifications on security events.
Threat Hunting: Conduct detailed threat analyses and investigations.
Flexible Integrations: Seamlessly connect with other security tools.
User-Friendly Interface: Navigate and manage with ease.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews when evaluating Graylog Security?

Improved Threat Detection: Enhanced ability to identify and respond to threats.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlined log management and analytics processes.
Scalability: Accommodate growing data needs without performance decline.
Customizability: Tailor features and dashboards to specific requirements.
Compliance: Maintain and prove regulatory compliance.
Cost-Effectiveness: Benefit from efficient resource use and reduced manual efforts.
Enhanced Support: Consideration for responsive and helpful support services.

Graylog Security is implemented across diverse industries, including healthcare for patient data protection, finance for transaction monitoring and fraud detection, and retail for safeguarding customer information. Each industry leverages its detailed analytics and real-time alerting to meet specific regulatory and operational standards, ensuring a secure and compliant environment.

Graylog

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Graylog Security

September 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Graylog Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Graylog Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Graylog Security report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.