No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Devo vs Graylog Security comparison

Devo and Graylog are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0, while Graylog is ranked #60. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Graylog’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Graylog users who would recommend it.
Devo
Read 25 Devo reviews
  • 6,397 Views
  • 3,582 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
Graylog Security
Read 2 Graylog Security reviews
  • 1,554 Views
  • 1,321 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Devo and Graylog Security offer robust security solutions, yet they excel in different areas based on user reviews. Users are happier with Devo's pricing and support, while Graylog Security is preferred for its features.

Features: Users value Devo for its comprehensive analytics, customizable alerting capabilities, and actionable insights. Graylog Security is preferred for its log management efficiency, real-time threat detection, and flexible data storage options.

Room for Improvement: Devo users suggest enhancements in report generation, interface intuitiveness, and greater integration capabilities. Graylog Security users desire better scalability, improved integration options, and a more user-friendly setup process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Graylog Security is appreciated for its versatile deployment options but receives mixed reviews on customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Devo users find the setup cost to be reasonable and experience satisfactory ROI. Graylog Security users express concerns about the initial setup cost but report good ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Graylog Security Report (Updated: June 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Devo vs. Graylog Security
June 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Devo
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
27th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (27th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (19th)
Graylog Security
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
60th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Graylog Security is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Devo1.2%
Graylog Security0.6%
Other98.2%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

FR
Francisco JavierRomo
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation
The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.
Read full review
Tony Zafiropoulos - PeerSpot reviewer
Tony Zafiropoulos
Owner/ Chief Engineer at Fixvirus.com
Aggregates logs in one place and helps to review data points
We tried Graylog Security, starting with their inexpensive open-source version. We tested it out and continued using it for a while. As for the main differences between Graylog Security and other vendors, some users might prefer cloud-based platforms over on-premises solutions. It isn't inherently cloud-native, but that might not matter much for some.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."
"The strength of Devo is not only in that it is pretty intuitive, but it gives you the flexibility and creativity to merge feeds. The prime examples would be using the synthesis or union tables that give you phenomenal capabilities... The ability to use a synthesis or union table to combine all those feeds and make heads or tails of what's going on, and link it to go down a thread, is functionality that I hadn't seen before."
"One of the immediate improvements that come to mind is the amount of hot, searchable data, as in the SIEM we had before we were only able to search back 90 days of hot, searchable data, whereas here we have 400 days worth, which has definitely improved our threat hunting capabilities."
"We can ingest virtually any log source, which is much better than our previous solution."
"The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them."
"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."
"I'm so happy with the platform."
"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."
More Devo pros
"We use the solution to collect logs."
"The tool aggregates logs. We can see the logs in one place."
 

Cons

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel."
"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there."
"From our experience, the Devo agent needs some work. They built it on top of OS Query's open-source framework. It seems like it wasn't tuned properly to handle a large volume of Windows event logs. In our experience, there would definitely be some room for improvement. A lot of SIEMs on the market have their own agent infrastructure. I think Devo's working towards that, but I think that it needs some improvement as far as keeping up with high-volume environments."
"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."
"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."
"The price is one problem with Devo."
"The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities."
"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."
More Devo cons
"Graylog Security needs to incorporate security scorecards."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."
"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."
"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."
"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."
"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."
"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."
"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."
"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."
More Devo pricing and cost advice
"I rate the tool's pricing a one out of ten."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Educational Organization
14%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Construction Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?
Pricing generally depends on the scale, data ingestion requirements, and integrations for what the enterprise monitoring needs. I have not been part of the procurement process, so I am not aware of...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Devo?
One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo.UI ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Devo?
Devo serves as our centralized log monitoring, threat investigation, alert monitoring, and security analytics platform. We use it to collect logs from multiple systems so we can correlate the event...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo
Compared 8% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo
Compared 8% of the time
New Relic vs Devo Logo
New Relic vs Devo
Compared 4% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Devo Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Devo
Compared 3% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo
Compared 3% of the time
More Devo Competitors
Wazuh vs Graylog Security Logo
Wazuh vs Graylog Security
Compared 26% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Graylog Security Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Graylog Security
Compared 24% of the time
Logpoint vs Graylog Security Logo
Logpoint vs Graylog Security
Compared 9% of the time
Elastic Security vs Graylog Security Logo
Elastic Security vs Graylog Security
Compared 6% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs Graylog Security Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Graylog Security
Compared 5% of the time
More Graylog Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Devo
June 2026
Devo reportDownload Devo product report
Buyer's Guide
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
June 2026
Graylog Security reportDownload Graylog Security product report
 

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?
  • Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
  • High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
  • Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
  • Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
  • Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
  • Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.
What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?
  • Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
  • Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
  • Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
  • Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
  • Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Graylog Security is designed for log management and analysis, assisting in monitoring security events, detecting threats, providing real-time alerts, and aiding troubleshooting and forensic investigations. Its scalability and customizable dashboards support IT departments in maintaining system performance and ensuring compliance.

With exceptional log management capabilities and powerful search functions, Graylog Security is reliable for threat hunting, integrating with other tools, and offering a user-friendly dashboard. Organizations value it for quickly analyzing large datasets and providing detailed insights into security events. However, better documentation and clearer instructions for new users, more efficient alerting capabilities, easier scaling, and enhanced support options could improve user satisfaction.

What are the most important features of Graylog Security?
  • Log Management: Efficiently handle and analyze extensive log data.
  • Scalability: Adapt to growing data volumes with ease.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Create tailored dashboards for specific needs.
  • Real-Time Alerting: Receive instant notifications on security events.
  • Threat Hunting: Conduct detailed threat analyses and investigations.
  • Flexible Integrations: Seamlessly connect with other security tools.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Navigate and manage with ease.
What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews when evaluating Graylog Security?
  • Improved Threat Detection: Enhanced ability to identify and respond to threats.
  • Operational Efficiency: Streamlined log management and analytics processes.
  • Scalability: Accommodate growing data needs without performance decline.
  • Customizability: Tailor features and dashboards to specific requirements.
  • Compliance: Maintain and prove regulatory compliance.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Benefit from efficient resource use and reduced manual efforts.
  • Enhanced Support: Consideration for responsive and helpful support services.

Graylog Security is implemented across diverse industries, including healthcare for patient data protection, finance for transaction monitoring and fraud detection, and retail for safeguarding customer information. Each industry leverages its detailed analytics and real-time alerting to meet specific regulatory and operational standards, ensuring a secure and compliant environment.

Graylog
 

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Devo vs. Graylog Security
June 2026
Free Report: Devo vs. Graylog Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Graylog Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Devo vs. Graylog Security report.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.