


Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Dell Trusted Device powered by CrowdStrike Falcon and Intel vPro are competing solutions in the endpoint security space. Dell Trusted Device may have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature richness enhanced by hardware-based security.
Features:Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides robust threat detection and automated investigation, with seamless integration in the Microsoft ecosystem offering real-time protection and analytics. Dell Trusted Device offers advanced threat prevention, real-time analytics, and a scalable architecture. Its integration with Intel vPro provides additional hardware-based security.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is simpler to deploy, especially in Windows-dominant environments, supported by strong infrastructure. Dell Trusted Device requires more initial setup due to its multi-layered security but offers robust customer service supported by Dell and CrowdStrike.
Pricing and ROI:Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers a cost-effective solution with quick ROI, particularly beneficial for businesses in the Microsoft ecosystem. Dell Trusted Device, while possibly higher in setup costs, provides substantial ROI with its wide-ranging security features and proactive management.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
We have not experienced downtime, yielding return on investment, and manual investigations have been eliminated—everything is handled by their product, ultimately saving a lot of engineering hours, which translates to money saved.
When you look at the damage it could do, especially in our industry, where we are growing bell peppers, tomatoes, and cucumbers, any downtime can result in a crop loss and other issues.
There have been detections that we would not have previously seen, and it has saved us a lot of time, especially with CrowdStrike's SOC team.
Without detection and protection measures, organizations would face substantial payments and reputational damage, including the necessity to inform customers about data breaches, potentially leading to loss of business.
We have seen a return on investment when using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, as it saves labor by reducing the need for staff to focus on it.
The biggest return on investment for me when using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is the time saving.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
I would rate the customer support a perfect ten.
I think they had a negative reputation tied to them several years ago, but in the past few years, they have really improved their game and they provide great support and they are always following up.
With every interaction that I have had with CrowdStrike on their technical support side, it has been a 10 out of 10.
The Microsoft agent, who did not actually work for Microsoft, is one of the vendors that Microsoft uses for support, said, 'Just to set expectations, my lunch break is in an hour and I am going to go away then.'
The level-one support seems disconnected from subject matter experts.
I rate Microsoft support 10 out of 10.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
Dell Trusted Device powered by CrowdStrike Falcon and Intel vPro scales very well with the growing needs of my company.
The cloud-based nature of Dell Trusted Device powered by CrowdStrike Falcon and Intel vPro makes it easier to add and manage devices without needing significant additional infrastructure.
It scales very well because we try to keep our environment 100% enforced with CrowdStrike.
We managed to scale it out in a short amount of time, with two months of planning and three months of implementation on 10,000 computers.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is scalable enough to handle various devices across environments, whether they are laptops, Android devices, or operating in hybrid environments.
Compatibility is its main feature.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be trusted completely.
I would assess the stability and reliability of Dell Trusted Device powered by CrowdStrike Falcon and Intel vPro as completely stable.
I would assess the stability and reliability of Dell Trusted Device powered by CrowdStrike Falcon and Intel vPro as very stable.
We have not had any downtime since we have integrated CrowdStrike with Dell Trusted Device powered by CrowdStrike Falcon and Intel vPro.
I haven't seen any outages with Microsoft.
I rate Defender 10 out of 10 for stability.
Defender for Endpoint is extremely stable.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
It has so many functions because it can go below the OS layer and already has amazing functions.
It's not really designed for servers. It's designed more for workstation fleet.
Intel and Dell's below the OS device health attestation flows into the CrowdStrike solution to help deliver a full picture of the endpoint security posture.
Repeated interactions are necessary due to Level One's lack of tools and knowledge, hindering efficient problem-solving and negatively impacting our experience with Microsoft support.
In contrast, competing products offer reduced pricing for long-term commitments, which makes it difficult for us in that environment.
We use Microsoft partners to help govern the platform, and as part of an alliance, we want to gather data from each tenant and combine them for a complete view.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Compared to CrowdStrike, which is very costly, and SentinelOne, which is also very costly, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a medium cost-efficient solution.
The initial setup cost is very high, but over time, it becomes cheaper on a per-person basis, while the licensing remains very costly compared to other EDR solutions.
It is set it and forget it, and you usually do not have to go back and look at your licenses again and worry about what you are going to lose or if certain things are going to change.
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, the price is more than others, but it deserves it; I think it truly does.
That has been the trend we have seen with Microsoft lately—it is just getting more and more expensive.
Given our extensive Microsoft licensing, transitioning to Defender for Endpoint did not affect licensing costs.
It costs $15 per VM for the P2 plan, which is seen as affordable for customers.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
I view the critical feature of advanced memory scanning that is enabled by my PC as essential because there are malware and malicious tools out there that embed themselves in memory and kernel memory.
The remote management capabilities provided by Intel vPro are also very valuable, especially for supporting users who work remotely, since I can troubleshoot and remediate devices without needing physical access.
Improved endpoint visibility, faster threat detection and response, stronger hardware-level protection, and reduced time spent troubleshooting devices through remote management, which helps reduce security risk and improve operational efficiency.
Defender for Endpoint's coverage across different platforms in our environment is pretty good. We have devices running Linux, Mac OS, Windows, iOS, and Android. It covers all of them.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides a unified management interface allowing customers to manage their on-premises and hybrid infrastructures from a single pane.
One of the best features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is its database for identifying zero-day attacks or malware attacks.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 5.6% |
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.7% |
| Dell Trusted Device powered by CrowdStrike Falcon and Intel vPro | 0.4% |
| Other | 90.3% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 54 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 82 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 45 |
| Large Enterprise | 96 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Dell Endpoint Security powered by CrowdStrike Falcon is a hardware-assisted security integration designed to protect endpoints from the silicon layer to the cloud. By combining Dell Trusted Device (DTD), CrowdStrike Falcon, and Intel vPro, it detects "below-the-OS" attacks that traditional software-only solutions may miss.
The Three Core Pillars
Key Benefits
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides comprehensive threat protection that integrates well with current systems, offering proactive threat detection and automatic updates while reducing manual efforts.
The platform is designed for seamless integration with Microsoft products, facilitating efficient management and use. It offers proactive ransomware protection and valuable threat intelligence, crucial for timely response and increased visibility across devices. Users highlight its ability to secure endpoints from viruses and malware, integrating with Windows and Office 365 to enhance real-time detection capabilities in diverse environments, including hybrid and on-premises setups. However, enhancements are needed in Linux integration, detection accuracy, and policy implementations.
What are the key features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is implemented across industries for securing endpoints, relying on its deep integration with Windows and Office 365 to protect against malware and viruses. Organizations benefit from its real-time detection and comprehensive management capabilities, particularly in hybrid environments where diverse digital infrastructures need safeguarding.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.