No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Dell OpenManage Integration for VMware vCenter vs VMware vSphere comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell OpenManage Integration...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Virtualization Management Tools (9th)
VMware vSphere
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
461
Ranking in other categories
Server Virtualization Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Virtualization solutions, they serve different purposes. Dell OpenManage Integration for VMware vCenter is designed for Virtualization Management Tools and holds a mindshare of 4.3%, up 3.0% compared to last year.
VMware vSphere, on the other hand, focuses on Server Virtualization Software, holds 18.5% mindshare, up 16.8% since last year.
Virtualization Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Dell OpenManage Integration for VMware vCenter4.3%
VMware Aria Operations22.4%
IBM Turbonomic17.1%
Other56.2%
Virtualization Management Tools
Server Virtualization Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
VMware vSphere18.5%
Hyper-V18.0%
Proxmox VE10.4%
Other53.1%
Server Virtualization Software
 

Featured Reviews

TS
Senior Distributed Platform Administrator at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Quick and easy deployment; great recovery
Veeam should work more closely with vCenter. Sometimes the Veeam backup can cause errors that can affect some of operations within the VMware machines. I cannot say whether the bug is with VMware or Veeam, but the companies should work together on this. Also, when something breaks, it's not easy for us to fix. I'm running a banking solution at my company and when there's a problem, I need to be proactive and quick to resolve the problem immediately. Any time I spend on the phone with technical support translates into losses for my company. So, training would be very beneficial. Empower me to use your product efficiently. It would also be nice for long-term customers to receive some sort of recognition in terms of price reduction.
RajeshK10 - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Technology Architect at Central Bank of India
Reliable virtualization has supported smooth DR drills and efficient resource allocation
VMware vSphere has proven to be robust in nature, and the new features are quite acceptable. The new features in NSX network switching make it more useful in the reliability management of data centers. vMotion has helped my organization's business continuity strategies during our planned DR drill activity. The migration of VMs from DC to DR is quite smooth with respect to the network link. I assess the impact of VMware vSphere's High Availability feature on my infrastructure resilience as effective during DR drill activities and firmware upgrades, which we perform every six months. During those times, we rely on maintenance mode of several servers, and HA works properly. I have nothing to complain about. We have utilized VMware vSphere's Distributed Resource Scheduler effectively. Even though we have over-provisioned the vCPUs, it efficiently manages the CPU cores and memory of the servers intelligently, so I am not experiencing any bottleneck in resource utilization. Distributed Resource Scheduler has affected my resource allocation performance positively, providing a 20 percent advantage over my old hardware.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"My experience with the solution's technical support was perfect. They are so knowledgeable, all of them. They don't take any chances."
"It's easy to use and very user-friendly."
"Virtualised automation is a useful feature."
"The most valuable feature of vSphere 6.7 is the HTML 5; I find it really awesome because it sped up all our daily operations, and it is reliable, stable, and much easier than the previous version."
"The tool makes virtualization easy. It was free, and we could profit from its GUI. It helps to manage VMs easily."
"The most valuable features for us are DRS, VMotion, and, of course, some of the analytics that we were able to define to quantify our workloads and tell us how we are able to make our data center more efficient."
"It gives us the ability to be running over 250+ VMs on five physical hosts and in various flavours of guest OSs."
"We haven't had any difficulties with it at all so far and it's been five years."
"We have absolutely seen a performance boost, in particular with some of our legacy applications."
 

Cons

"When something breaks, it's not easy for us to fix."
"When something breaks, it's not easy for us to fix. I'm running a banking solution at my company and when there's a problem, I need to be proactive and quick to resolve the problem immediately."
"For managing many ESXi's at once vCenter is required. when the number of ESXi is smaller, it is not practical to have a vCenter server."
"Generally, the user interface needs to be improved for non-technical people."
"The costs are inflated for small and medium-size businesses (SMBs)."
"OS templates should be readily available, so there is no need to get an OS separately. Only the activation part should be different, which is not presently available due to the need to get the OS from a different location, then create VMs."
"VMware has amped up how frequently they release new versions and that adds instability to a stable environment."
"I do not find it to be simple and efficient to manage. The tools, the interface to manage it, are a pain."
"You need to learn the internals of the system to really customize and reap all benefits."
"The biggest issue with stability is the SSO. That is still an issue as far as integrating it with Active Directory, and any large scale of it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"When comparing the price of VMware solutions to other vendors, such as Nutanix, they are costly."
"Compared with other vendors’ products, the pricing of the license is slightly lower. The annual S&S price is very affordable."
"In the past six months, we have saved around 110TBs of storage, which is almost equivalent to $200,000 USD. That is a huge savings."
"There are some competitive vendors out there who are sticking to the original model that VMware seemed to have, which includes a lot of additional features and functionality in the initial pricing, and I think they are gaining a lot of market share based on the fact that they are keeping their licensing simple. The only argument I have with VMware is that, when I ask about a new solution to our VMware team, I hear comments like, "For a nominal fee we can upgrade your license and you can have that." For the large number of Hypervisors and the scale we have, it's frustrating to hear that I have to go ask for additional money for very small, additional features that I think should be included."
"Licensing fees are not paid yearly, or monthly."
"VMware does provide organizations with discounts. The customer service license fee we got discounts on from the supplier in order for us to get the best out of the license fees. That's our experience. We possibly paid less than our partner company. The partner is only local and not global like our firm."
"VMware is consistently expensive and their pricing arrogance is what will drive us and other customers away."
"The price could always be lower, but I think it's fair."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtualization Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
918,614 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user234735 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Consultant, ASEAN at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
May 10, 2015
Hyper-V 2012 R2 vs. VMware vSphere 5.5
I was won with Hyper-V 2012R2 recently and the table below based on customer RFP (edited). This articles all about technical, there is not related with TCO/ROI, licensing cost, “political”, etc. Another to noted is the Windows Server 2012 licenses is based on 2 socket CPU, meanwhile…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business177
Midsize Enterprise138
Large Enterprise261
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is IOMMU?
DEEPEN DHULLA did explain well IOMMU. IOMMU has to be activated at the bios level. It exists on Intel and AMD platforms. It is used a lot inside virtualization platforms like VMware VSphere. It pr...
Why KVM??? Help please!
We use VMware and KVM. We find that KVM is a lot simpler to use and it provides the virtualization we need for Linux and Windows. For us, VMware does not offer any advantage. Moreover, KVM is free.
Proxmox vs ESXi/vSphere: What is your experience?
For me the biggest impact is the cost of licensing in the case of VMware despite its overall intuitiveness and ease of handling and management. However, KVM-based Open Source solutions are becoming...
 

Also Known As

OpenManage Integration for VMware vCenter , Dell Management Plug-in for VMware vCenter
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

FAW Foundry, Viasat
Abu Dhabi Ports Company, ACS, AIA New Zealand, Consona, Corporate Express, CS Energy, and Digiweb.
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Nutanix, IBM and others in Virtualization Management Tools. Updated: October 2026.
918,614 professionals have used our research since 2012.