No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Dell AppSync vs Hitachi HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell AppSync
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Copy Data Management (4th)
Hitachi HiCommand Tiered St...
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Rhett Waldock - PeerSpot reviewer
Programmer Analyst at Mankato Clinic, Ltd.
Simple to install, reliable, and has good technical support
There were some limitations in the product that prompted us to shift away from it. You could only have one AppSync profile per server to target where the data could be replicated to. There were a few specific feature limitations in terms of flexibility that required the development of an alternative. However, that was the only flaw. In relation to, the replication destinations. We wanted to collect data from multiple systems and then replicate it on a single system. AppSync was based on a one-to-one replication footprint, which was the limitation that we had encountered. We needed to combine several systems into one. That was one of the scenarios provided by the solution. I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements.
it_user165981 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees
Enables you to efficiently relocate data. Should focus more on small-midrange markets.
The Tiered Storage Manager enables you to efficiently relocate data using the Data Lifecycle Management. This allocates the data storage destination using data access frequency and usage value. Information tends to be accessed most frequently when it is first created, but that frequency drops as time passes. Data with a high usage frequency is stored in high-performance storage. When the usage frequency of the data decreases, the data is migrated to a lower performance subsystem, resulting in significantly lower storage costs.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's integration with SQL and Exchange for VSS-based backup works perfectly, the agent is easy to install, the GUI is easy to navigate and debugging is easy to enable or disable."
"This solution is very helpful and easy to use."
"The automation of the replication process is the most valuable feature, as we just configure or schedule the replication process once and the work is done automatically."
"I believe one of the advantages we saw was that the configuration was manageable."
"We have application consistent snaps of SQL mounted to development VM’s daily."
"It gave us enough time to do the backup for big databases and mount them in a certain location, from there on tapes."
"The EMC RM is a very useful technology for consistent data replicas for a significant application portfolio like MS SQL, MS Exchange, Oracle DB etc."
"However if you wanted a reliable product to work with new or existing EMC products then I would recommend taking a look at Replication Manager."
"Tiered Storage Manager enables you to improve the efficiency of your storage management by reducing total cost of ownership, balancing storage load, and managing changes to the storage environment."
"Very nice ROI, happy that it works when we are in need."
"Ability to perform NON-distruptive migrations."
"Previously I worked with EMC/IBM/HP storage and they are good for between mid and high end range, but when it’s high end or enterprise storage, Hitachi VSP is the best."
 

Cons

"When I deployed the Replication Manager and detected issues, I found that the technical support was not really helpful because they spent a lot of time to found a hotfix which resolved my problem."
"Yes. Periodically I needed to restart the agent on the client side and sometimes on the server side."
"I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements."
"Mount replica function through EMC RM needs to be faster because when you are using Veritas volumes with mirrors the mount routine is too late (the mount process time is directly proportional the volume size when you are using Veritas Volume Manager (vxvm))."
"Each replication manager installation can only handle so many records. If you have over a certain number of bookmarks or snaps, the GUI becomes un-usable."
"The product needs to be less complex (compatibility, solution enabler etc.)."
"It would be helpful if this product has features for transferring to the cloud."
"There were some limitations in the product that prompted us to shift away from it."
"Hitachi needs to focus on small and mid-range markets also."
"Currently, there is a 2 TB size limit to Externalize LUNs onto the Hitachi Arrays."
"Maybe focus on small and midrange markets."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe we paid them on a yearly basis."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Copy Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Also Known As

AppSync, Replication Manager
HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Getronics
Cumulus
Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce, Hitachi Vantara, IBM and others in Copy Data Management. Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.