No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Dell AppSync vs IBM Softek TDMF comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell AppSync
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Copy Data Management (4th)
IBM Softek TDMF
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Data Replication (17th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Dell AppSync and IBM Softek TDMF aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Dell AppSync is designed for Copy Data Management and holds a mindshare of 17.3%, down 20.5% compared to last year.
IBM Softek TDMF, on the other hand, focuses on Data Replication, holds 2.9% mindshare, up 0.5% since last year.
Copy Data Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Dell AppSync17.3%
IBM Storage Defender Copy Data Management17.5%
Hitachi Ops Center Protector13.9%
Other51.300000000000004%
Copy Data Management
Data Replication Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Softek TDMF2.9%
NetApp SnapMirror6.7%
Dell RecoverPoint5.2%
Other85.2%
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

Rhett Waldock - PeerSpot reviewer
Programmer Analyst at Mankato Clinic, Ltd.
Simple to install, reliable, and has good technical support
There were some limitations in the product that prompted us to shift away from it. You could only have one AppSync profile per server to target where the data could be replicated to. There were a few specific feature limitations in terms of flexibility that required the development of an alternative. However, that was the only flaw. In relation to, the replication destinations. We wanted to collect data from multiple systems and then replicate it on a single system. AppSync was based on a one-to-one replication footprint, which was the limitation that we had encountered. We needed to combine several systems into one. That was one of the scenarios provided by the solution. I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements.
it_user150294 - PeerSpot reviewer
Deputy Manager- Datacenter & Cloud with 10,001+ employees
It very easy to setup and manage unless you have network problems.
There were restrictions when migrating from older to newer versions of Windows. As soon as the target disk is mounted on the higher level of Windows, NTFS file system will automatically be upgraded by Windows and will no longer be compatible with the source system. This means that migration cannot be resumed and a full refresh was needed to re-synchronize the source and target disks.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The EMC RM is a very useful technology for consistent data replicas for a significant application portfolio like MS SQL, MS Exchange, Oracle DB etc."
"This solution is very helpful and easy to use."
"However if you wanted a reliable product to work with new or existing EMC products then I would recommend taking a look at Replication Manager."
"This solution is very helpful and easy to use."
"We have application consistent snaps of SQL mounted to development VM’s daily."
"I believe one of the advantages we saw was that the configuration was manageable."
"It has excellent performance and reliability, and with a little more flexibility, it could be nearly perfect."
"It gave us enough time to do the backup for big databases and mount them in a certain location, from there on tapes."
"TDMF resolved these problems with easy and fast data migrations."
 

Cons

"I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements."
"The product needs to be less complex (compatibility, solution enabler etc.)."
"It would be helpful if this product has features for transferring to the cloud."
"When I deployed the Replication Manager and detected issues, I found that the technical support was not really helpful because they spent a lot of time to found a hotfix which resolved my problem."
"Mount replica function through EMC RM needs to be faster because when you are using Veritas volumes with mirrors the mount routine is too late (the mount process time is directly proportional the volume size when you are using Veritas Volume Manager (vxvm))."
"It would be helpful if this product has features for transferring to the cloud."
"Each replication manager installation can only handle so many records. If you have over a certain number of bookmarks or snaps, the GUI becomes un-usable."
"There were some limitations in the product that prompted us to shift away from it."
"Mobility Groups crashes sometimes and a re-synchronization were needed"
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe we paid them on a yearly basis."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Copy Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
886,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Construction Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Also Known As

AppSync, Replication Manager
Softek TDMF
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Getronics
BT
Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce, IBM, Hitachi Vantara and others in Copy Data Management. Updated: March 2026.
886,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.