Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell AppSync vs NetApp SnapMirror comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell AppSync
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Copy Data Management (4th)
NetApp SnapMirror
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Data Replication (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

Dell AppSync and NetApp SnapMirror aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Dell AppSync is designed for Copy Data Management and holds a mindshare of 15.8%, down 18.8% compared to last year.
NetApp SnapMirror, on the other hand, focuses on Data Replication, holds 6.9% mindshare, down 19.2% since last year.
Copy Data Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Dell AppSync15.8%
IBM Storage Defender Copy Data Management18.7%
Perforce Delphix14.0%
Other51.5%
Copy Data Management
Data Replication Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
NetApp SnapMirror6.9%
NetApp Snapshot6.6%
Fivetran4.9%
Other81.6%
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

Rhett Waldock - PeerSpot reviewer
Programmer Analyst at Mankato Clinic, Ltd.
Simple to install, reliable, and has good technical support
There were some limitations in the product that prompted us to shift away from it. You could only have one AppSync profile per server to target where the data could be replicated to. There were a few specific feature limitations in terms of flexibility that required the development of an alternative. However, that was the only flaw. In relation to, the replication destinations. We wanted to collect data from multiple systems and then replicate it on a single system. AppSync was based on a one-to-one replication footprint, which was the limitation that we had encountered. We needed to combine several systems into one. That was one of the scenarios provided by the solution. I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements.
GP
Storage IT Specialist at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Achieves seamless business continuity with robust scalability
The features of NetApp SnapMirror that I have found most valuable include the possibility to stop synchronization in case of high network latency and to limit the bandwidth throttle. This means limiting bandwidth when less connectivity occurs or opening wide the throttling to use the full speed of network connectivity, which we can adjust according to our needs or the needs of our customers. All of this is done without limiting business continuity, so business continuity is always guaranteed. NetApp SnapMirror's data replication feature supports disaster recovery strategies, as it is incorporated into the business continuity feature. SnapMirror is strictly related to snapshot features, a core part of ONTAP, so it's very flexible. It allows us to start with just two snapshots as a simple backup and then use them as a replication point or base for both backup and business continuity. There is no right or wrong answer, it just depends on how it works for specific needs.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution is very helpful and easy to use."
"I believe one of the advantages we saw was that the configuration was manageable."
"The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration."
"The product has good performance."
"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use."
"NetApp SnapMirror's ease of use and reliability are valuable features."
"The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements."
"The user interface is very easy to manage. The replication is also very easy to set up."
"The synchronous and real-time replication are the most vital features of NetApp SnapMirror"
"The solution is very stable."
 

Cons

"I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements."
"It would be helpful if this product has features for transferring to the cloud."
"It's necessary to install NetApp simulator to avoid complications."
"The user interface could be simplified. They might want to have fewer options on it, to make it less complicated. There are a lot of options we never use ourselves. They're often very specialized and don't apply to us."
"Synchronous replication with read-write on both sides in both data centers is powerful but risky since it is greatly affected by high network latency."
"Compression and deduplication could be improved."
"The tool should also work on third-party solutions."
"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."
"It is not as efficient as it needs to be. It doesn't compress the data really well when it is forwarded to a secondary site. The download performance could be better."
"The price needs to be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe we paid them on a yearly basis."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The pricing can be improved."
"SnapMirror is extremely expensive. We had a hard time adjusting to our budget. If rated on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I would definitely rate it ten out of ten."
"The product price is reasonable."
"The solution has monthly and yearly licensing options."
"It's part of the NetApp Firewall, so it's free."
"The cost is low compared to different vendors."
"It's a highly cost-effective solution"
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Copy Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Healthcare Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Retailer
8%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about NetApp SnapMirror?
The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements.
What needs improvement with NetApp SnapMirror?
Some areas of NetApp SnapMirror that could be improved or enhanced include synchronous SnapMirror, which needs improvement as it suffers significantly from network latency. In particular, synchrono...
 

Also Known As

AppSync, Replication Manager
SnapMirror
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Getronics
University at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College
Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce, IBM, Hitachi Vantara and others in Copy Data Management. Updated: November 2025.
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.