

Find out in this report how the two AI Customer Support solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
He stated that the performance was significantly higher than elsewhere, and he found it suitable for his needs.
When it comes to the evolution of STT, multiple things are considered. One is the technical offering and accuracy of Deepgram, then ease of integration, and cost of implementation.
I can tell you that we probably saved at least three employees full-time with the ticket management and the automation and the macros and the user follow-up being built in.
Time saved is definitely a benefit because it puts all of our tickets in one spot.
I feel that Zendesk helped us set up our platform for providing support way faster than other platforms due to its easy configuration.
We have extensive support available on Deepgram websites and they have many GitHub repositories.
The most important aspect of the documentation is that it is structured so that AI can read it effectively.
There appears to be a lack of connection between the bot and the agents, making it feel scripted rather than helpful.
The technical support provided by Zendesk has been very satisfactory.
Their support team from Zendesk is excellent, similar to what you have in Freshdesk.
AWS provides higher scalability with 10,000 connections at a single go, despite higher latency than Deepgram.
I'm not sure if Deepgram offers options to choose the server location, such as having a server in Frankfurt like AWS.
Deepgram's scalability has been fine; there were some limit issues with Vapi.
We have not hit a peak or a turn yet that Zendesk has not been able to go with us or been able to grow with us in the process, change or pivot that the company is making.
Zendesk can scale from very small companies to very large ones.
Zendesk's scalability is excellent.
We have never faced any issues with downtime.
Deepgram has been stable and reliable
They are always informing us with a status update and an ETA, and the turnaround time is usually within the same day with no extended downtime that would cause a detriment to our company.
Zendesk is quite stable; we experience major outages only once or twice a year, making it very reliable.
The stability has been quite reliable.
If it had support for many more languages, especially regional languages, it would be valuable.
Considering additional accents from Chilean or Argentine speakers could improve the model's performance with local words.
They also came up with their own agent builder framework, where you can directly go to their website and build your voice agent in 10-20 minutes.
Zendesk could actually support HTML on the tickets so we could format our text better than the current options such as size, bold, italic, or underscored, because the text processing is too simple.
Zendesk is missing an AI aspect that could help provide quick answers based on the knowledge housed within the platform.
Zendesk is amazing, and because they are always working on a new upgrade or a new integration, they are very forward-thinking from an engineering perspective.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good, as I found it to be cheaper without any problems.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that pricing is seamless and customizable as needed.
It is not the cheapest solution nor the most expensive, but it provides value for money.
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Zendesk was quite expensive.
Deepgram has positively impacted my organization by achieving our desired results, which is very good from the overall technology perspective, saving a lot of time for the support team since the voice agent replaced the human agents managing the calls, thus improving response time and reducing the time dedicated by those human agents.
The most valuable capabilities of Deepgram that I've found so far include low latency, as it offers less than 200 milliseconds, which is not provided by any other text-to-speech models.
The best thing with Deepgram is they are continually evolving and doing a lot of market research. They take feedback seriously.
It allows us to handle more support cases with fewer people due to its advanced artificial intelligence capabilities.
Zendesk is way cheaper than other ITSM platforms such as ServiceNow, providing a good platform at a lower price so we could offer good support with a low budget for the license.
Being able to put response counters on certain tickets and have certain ones that are high priority and have a tighter SLA than lower priority items, being able to categorize them as a question versus an urgent request, and being able to bucket them as feature requests or product enhancements.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Deepgram | 1.5% |
| Zendesk | 1.2% |
| Other | 97.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 36 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Deepgram stands out for its speed in transcribing videos and speech to text, leveraging cutting-edge models like Whisper and Nova for exceptional performance and accuracy. Its latency is remarkably low, enabling swift transcription that users find superior to alternatives.
Deepgram provides an efficient solution for transforming video and audio content into text, benefiting from its advanced ability to recognize industry-specific terminology. Users experience faster results compared to IBM Watson and OpenAI's Whisper model, with low latency contributing to its appeal. However, challenges in speaker recognition and language support remain areas for improvement. Additionally, stronger spelling and grammar accuracy could enhance its performance. Some seek expanded multi-language capabilities and improved manageability during testing phases, noting its slightly less accuracy compared to other tools.
What are Deepgram's most notable features?Deepgram is widely implemented across industries for transcribing speech to text, often used by organizations for generating machine transcripts of legal proceedings and other vital communications. Teams deploy it on local systems to convert videos and phone calls, integrating speech recognition seamlessly into applications.
Zendesk provides a versatile platform for managing customer interactions, offering efficient ticketing, customization, and integration features across multiple channels to enhance user experiences.
Zendesk stands out for its simplicity, ease of use, and comprehensive integration capabilities with CRM tools, which help optimize workflow efficiency. Users benefit from advanced analytics and reporting features that offer valuable insights into customer behavior. Multi-channel support and self-service portals are integral components, enhancing customer interaction experiences. While security protocols and flexible configurations contribute to its broad appeal, areas for improvement include more intuitive reporting, advanced customization of triggers and automations, and enhancements in knowledge management. Users express the need for better ticket management functionalities, efficient data synchronization, and refined interface aesthetics. Performance can be impacted by extensive customization, and there’s a call for competitive pricing and simplified licensing options.
What are Zendesk's most important features?Zendesk is extensively applied across sectors for customer support management and technical issue resolution. In HR or IT settings, it facilitates internal requests and knowledge base creation. Organizations leverage Zendesk's integration with collaboration tools like Slack and Jira, automating workflows and delivering detailed analytics, which are particularly useful for multinational operations handling queries in different languages and brands.
We monitor all AI Customer Support reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.