Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs Malwarebytes Teams comparison

Deep Instinct and Malwarebytes are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Deep Instinct is ranked #27 with an average rating of 10.0, while Malwarebytes is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.5. Deep Instinct holds a 1.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to Malwarebytes’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Deep Instinct users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Malwarebytes users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 15, 2026

Malwarebytes Teams and Deep Instinct Prevention Platform compete in the cybersecurity sector, providing endpoint protection solutions. Deep Instinct seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced predictive capabilities and lower false-positive rates.

Features: Malwarebytes Teams offers strong protection capabilities, an easy-to-use interface, and robust malware detection and removal features. It provides a straightforward deployment process, a reliable engine, and comprehensive threat scanning. Deep Instinct excels in advanced predictive capabilities, high accuracy, and low false-positive rates. It provides compatibility across multiple operating systems and a unified deployment model simplifying endpoint management.

Room for Improvement: Malwarebytes Teams could enhance its reporting features, reduce false positives, and improve integration with other security solutions. There is also a need for better resource management. Deep Instinct needs to expand Linux support, improve incident reporting, and provide more detailed logging. Enhancements in ease of deployment and patch management for specific OS environments are also needed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Malwarebytes Teams demonstrates versatility in deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds. Users generally report satisfaction with technical support, though complex issues can face delays. Deep Instinct has a simpler deployment process due to its single-agent approach, with some system integration challenges. Customer service is praised for thoroughness and responsiveness, with room for better user feedback engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes Teams is competitively priced but seen as slightly high without automatic entitlement to new features on premium licenses. Despite this, pricing aligns with the market offering middle-range value. Deep Instinct's pricing is more premium, justified by its advanced capabilities and reduced operational overhead, making it cost-effective for larger deployments. Favorable pricing for non-profits adds to its appeal. Both solutions show a positive ROI through effective security functions and reduced risk exposure.

To learn more, read our detailed Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Malwarebytes Teams is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.9%
Malwarebytes Teams	1.6%
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform	1.1%
Other	93.4%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Tom Foal

CTO at Klaatu IT Security Ltd

Stops ransomware before it executes and reduces response time for the team

A potential area of improvement for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is their focus on file uploads and large data storage, backups, and other related areas. It is difficult to think of what they could improve, but low information provided by the system when it detects something is one area, particularly in scripting. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform detects malicious scripts but it needs better measures, perhaps signing scripts, so we can be sure that a script is created by a client, not by some malware. It is really about helping us triage incidents effectively, so a bit more help with the analysis of incidents, particularly what the Deep Instinct Prevention Platform agent has discovered, would be beneficial. We need to know what it has spotted that makes it suspect malware.

Read full review

reviewer2594097

Chief Executive Officer at a wholesaler/distributor with 11-50 employees

Exceptional malware protection with regular updates and behavior-based detection

There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity. The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it. Other customers have mentioned issues with false positives. It lacks enterprise-level management and more enterprise functionality. CrowdStrike and SentinelOne are much more enterprise-grade solutions. Malwarebytes has limited integration with cybersecurity tools and lacks enterprise integrations because it is not an enterprise product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can use Cortex XDR to get the entire graph of the incidents from source to destination, and we can take remedial action."

"The solution doesn't need a high level of technical training."

"It's a perfect solution. It integrates well into the environment."

"There are a lot of lead solutions in this space, however, Palo Alto is number one."

"The product's most valuable features are massive user and feature intelligence exploit detection."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks should be a stable solution."

"My advice for others looking into using Cortex is that it is very easy to use and very useful for the customer environment, whether it's a public or private one."

"We use Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for its ability to detect based on behavior rather than simple virus scan to prevent malicious activities."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The most important thing is that it is for prevention. It prevents attacks of any type of malware. Normally, what we've seen in other products is that they are not for prevention. They isolate a possible threat that they don't understand or know about, and then they check it with our database to see if it needs any correction or elimination. This means that the threat is already inside a customer's base, whereas Deep Instinct prevents a threat from getting in. Prevention is basically done by an agent in each installation, PCU, or product. An agent has its own intelligence to be able to detect if it should stop a threat or not. It has been taught. It is like a brain that has been taught to react according to any possible threat. Deep Instinct is very light. It doesn't take too much CPU attention or memory. It doesn't slow down the performance. You don't really realize any change in the performance, which makes it very different from other solutions. They are usually heavy for the users."

"Deep Instinct can actually predict unknown malware that is going to come out, as well, because of the way they have built this technology."

"The user interface is a good feature; it shows which process has been accessed and the flow, and the detections for PowerShell are also pretty good, as is the active scripts detection feature."

"The support is very good. They reply and respond very quickly."

"Good detections for PowerShell. and good user interface."

"No valuable quote available from the provided review sections."

"When we were looking at Carbon Black and Sophos, the prevention pieces weren't as strong when compared to DI, which is why we decided to go with DI... I would rather have a product that does the prevention up front and saves me the effort of having to wipe someone's workstation."

"Instead of having features like rollback and after-event actionable stuff, the whole premise and the context of the solution is to actually prevent these malicious attacks from happening to begin with.... The ability to prevent threats is the most appealing aspect. It absolutely, 100 percent helps with real-time prevention of unknown malware. That's the strength of the product."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform pros

"The installation process is very easy, especially since it is on the cloud."

"The most valuable features of the solution are malware scanning and malware removal."

"The endpoint protection and response that allows us to restore a machine back to a pre-infected state are the most valuable features."

"I commonly recommend Malwarebytes to people due to the fact that I find it quite reliable."

"Being able to cloud manage it from just a cloud login is valuable. We can get to it from anywhere, which is really helpful. The fact that we can remediate from the cloud console is one of our favorite features."

"It gets the job done, and they are consistently updating it monthly."

"The pricing of the product is very good."

"Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience."

More Malwarebytes Teams pros

Cons

"The solution needs better reports. I think they should let the customer go in and customize the reports."

"It automatically detects security issues. It should be able to protect our network devices while operating autonomously."

"However, if you do not have Palo Alto in your environment, you are paying these additional services just for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, so it is not a cost-effective solution."

"The solution eats memory of the computer, unlike anything I've ever seen."

"Cortex XDR should have a lightweight agent, and the agent size should not be heavy."

"It's more focused on network communication. If a customer wants to increase the level of protection and start working with documents, it's impossible to integrate these features into the system. It's more of a communication-oriented system than a content security-oriented system."

"I would like to see some additional features related to email protection included."

"Traps doesn't work with McAfee. You need to remove McAfee to install Traps. This is very common, and its nothing that should be an issue. Some antivirus engines recognize Traps as an threat component, so maybe they need to shake hands somewhere."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"I would like to see improvement in the user interface so that the user has more control."

"Some of the features are very resource intensive, such as the ransomware detection. It consumed so much of the resource on the endpoints that we have disabled those functions."

"The main area for improvement in Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is Arm support, which is not implemented yet."

"Some features are too resource intensive."

"The Management Console is not localized."

"When things get done automatically, I would appreciate more logging of what's happening in the background... we should be able to backtrack from the log that gets uploaded to our cloud instance and see, forensically, what the root cause was."

"The Deep Instinct client stops working when you have two servers and you add high availability or Windows Failover Cluster mode. It doesn't work in a clustered mode. I haven't yet had time to go back and talk with their support and get it fixed. It would be good if they can make the installation independent of an actual user. Currently, its installation is dependent on the actual user being logged in. For example, a computer has to be logged in for the installation to happen. If it is not logged in, then on the cloud platform, it is going to show that the client is offline. On the management side of the cloud platform, we would like to have the administrators segregated by logical entities. We have told them that on their cloud management platform, we would like to be able to segregate clients into different logical entities or organizations so that the administrators are able to manage only those entities that are within their designated organization."

"I would love to see a really exceptional, outstanding level of reporting. I know that's like asking for a unicorn to leap out of the sky with any of these products... When everything works, clients began to wonder: "Everything's fine. Why do we need you?" That's where the reporting capabilities would allow us to really demonstrate: "Hey, here's what's actually going on, Mr. Customer.""

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform cons

"The EPP solution lacks the sophisticated artificial intelligence required for automating reports and letting you know about things in real-time. It stops a suspicious activity in real-time, but it doesn't let you know in real-time. You have to look at a report, and then you find out that something is wrong. You have to manually kick off a scan. With the Advanced EDR solutions, Malwarebytes has the ability to alert you in real-time, but they still don't do automatic remediation or quarantining of devices. That is something that you still have to do manually. So, the endpoint protection piece, which is just like their basic endpoint protection, lacks AI. For the advanced detection and response piece, there is an add-on that comes with it, but it still doesn't go far enough in terms of automatic remediation of viruses. It won't separate that virus from your network if something happens. You have to manually go there and do it."

"The product update capability needs to be improved."

"There's no indication on the system as to when the software is doing a scan."

"Every once in a while, it gets clobbered by updates from other places. I don't think this should happen."

"It's not covering everything as we just started in EDR. In Malwarebytes, there's no response. The response is very limited, and integration is very limited."

"My clients have frequently encountered some tech support scams where when you go to a particular website, it throws up a fake warning to you and states that you need to call this number."

"We had a little performance problem with the solution, but that's been resolved. Since then, it's been running well."

"Notifications are lacking."

More Malwarebytes Teams cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is an expensive solution."

"In terms of the cost Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very expensive because we are a Mexican company and when you translate dollars to pesos the cost is very high. The solution is very expensive for Mexican companies. I understand that they have international prices, but I do not think it offsets the price enough for many companies in countries, such as Mexico. The amount it is reduced is not a massive percentage."

"I did PoCs on products called Cylance and CrowdStrike. Although, I consider these products and they were also good, when it come to cost and budgetary factors, Traps has been proven to be better than the other two products. It is quite cost-effective and delivers all the entire solution which we require."

"The cost of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is $55 to $90 USD per endpoint per month."

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"The tool's price is moderate."

"Our license will require renewal in August, after which the maintenance will continue as usual."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Pricing and licensing are very straightforward. It's two SKUs, one is for the console and the other is for the client."

"If I include the false positive rate and the detection rate in the comparison, Deep Instinct is worth its price."

"In comparison to the other products out there, it's exceptionally competitively priced. When you consider the lower administrative overhead that it facilitates, it's an absolute value."

"We are a nonprofit. The MSP had provides pretty decent nonprofit rates for us. This was one of the key factors that made us choose Deep Instinct over its competitors who were significantly more expensive."

"One thing about their licensing program that I like is that just one covers the server as well as on the endpoint as well as mobile devices. There is no complexity in calculating how many SKUs I need for mobile, for laptop, for desktop, and for servers. It's very simple and that makes it much easier to budget."

"There are no additional costs on the price, and our company has a support contract, which bundles in those services anyway."

"Their pricing is very competitive. It is good, fair, and a lot cheaper than what we were doing with Cylance."

"There is a need for customers of the product to pay towards the licensing costs of the tool."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform pricing and cost advice

"Malwarebytes is a cost-effective product."

"I would say that it's affordable. It costs much less than Sentinel One, CrowdStrike, or anything of that nature. But, at the same time, you are getting what you pay for. So I would say it's one of the best when you're comparing traditional NextGen AVs like Webroot that aren't the best in the bunch."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"I believe the retail price is between $40 and $50 per copy."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"Yearly, it is around $50 per client."

"The platform pricing is competitive with other antivirus products."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

More Malwarebytes Teams pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Deep Instinct?

The price for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is reasonable. It is about the same price as any other antivirus.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Deep Instinct?

A potential area of improvement for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is their focus on file uploads and large data s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Deep Instinct?

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is basically a stopper that prevents any malware, including zero-days. The main ben...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Malwarebytes?

My primary use case is that it's protecting me against malware.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 6% of the time

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform Competitors

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

More Malwarebytes Teams Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

August 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

August 2026

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform report

Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams

July 2026

Download Malwarebytes Teams product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform offers a prevent-first solution with a focus on detecting zero-day threats, featuring user-friendly deployment and robust cross-platform functionality. It integrates well with other security tools to enhance threat detection capabilities.

Deep Instinct leverages deep learning for advanced malware and ransomware prevention. Its lightweight design and easy deployment make it a favored choice for endpoint protection. While praised for its compatibility and minimal updates, challenges exist with Linux support, high resource use in ransomware detection, and the need for better control in administration. Organizations implementing Deep Instinct enjoy real-time prevention against threats like phishing and zero-day exploits.

What are the key features?

Prevent-First Approach: Focusing on preventing threats before they occur.
Deep Learning: Utilizing deep learning for superior malware detection.
User-Friendly Interface: Easy to navigate and deploy across platforms.
Minimal Updates: Requires fewer updates, ensuring consistent protection.
Cross-Platform Functionality: Supports multiple platforms for wider applicability.

What benefits should you consider?

Excellent Accuracy: High accuracy in detecting threats with minimal false positives.
Resource Efficiency: Optimized for low resource consumption during operation.
Integration Capability: Seamlessly integrates with other security strategies.
Real-Time Prevention: Offers real-time responses to emerging threats.

Deep Instinct finds implementation in industries needing robust endpoint protection, adopted by security consultants and resellers for client solutions. It serves managed services aiming to replace traditional antiviruses and safeguards against malware and phishing attacks.

Deep Instinct

Malwarebytes Teams provides advanced threat protection and efficient detection and removal capabilities, featuring cloud-based management and robust endpoint security. It operates on Windows and Mac, emphasizing threat interception and the cloud-management interface.

Offering comprehensive protection, Malwarebytes Teams is recognized for its customizable and user-friendly interface. The anti-exploit feature effectively intercepts threats in Office applications, while frequent updates maintain security standards. Efficient scanning, threat response, and rollback features are highly valued, as is its ability to integrate seamlessly into diverse environments. Remote accessibility and cloud management enhance its robust endpoint protection.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes Teams?

Comprehensive Threat Protection: Advanced detection and removal for malware.
Cloud-Based Management: Manage security conveniently from the cloud.
Anti-Exploit Feature: Protects against threats in Office applications.
Efficient Scanning: Quick and effective threat detection.
Threat Response and Rollback: Swift response with rollback capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Continuous updates and strong endpoint protection.
Integration Flexibility: Works well with existing environments.
Reporting Capabilities: Offers effective reporting and monitoring.
Remote Accessibility: Manage security from any location.

Malwarebytes Teams is widely implemented in cybersecurity across industries for endpoint security. Organizations deploy it for malware detection, intrusion protection, and compliance scanning, relying on its antivirus capabilities and ransomware rollback. It serves as a secondary tool alongside primary systems to enhance security on both Windows and Mac environments, particularly valued for monitoring usage behaviors without controlling endpoints.

Malwarebytes

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Knutson Construction

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams

June 2026

Free Report: Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams

Find out what your peers are saying about Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.