Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs Malwarebytes Teams comparison

Deep Instinct and Malwarebytes are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Deep Instinct is ranked #30 with an average rating of 10.0, while Malwarebytes is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.5. Deep Instinct holds a 1.0% mindshare in EPP, compared to Malwarebytes’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Deep Instinct users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Malwarebytes users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 15, 2026

Malwarebytes Teams and Deep Instinct Prevention Platform compete in the cybersecurity sector, providing endpoint protection solutions. Deep Instinct seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced predictive capabilities and lower false-positive rates.

Features: Malwarebytes Teams offers strong protection capabilities, an easy-to-use interface, and robust malware detection and removal features. It provides a straightforward deployment process, a reliable engine, and comprehensive threat scanning. Deep Instinct excels in advanced predictive capabilities, high accuracy, and low false-positive rates. It provides compatibility across multiple operating systems and a unified deployment model simplifying endpoint management.

Room for Improvement: Malwarebytes Teams could enhance its reporting features, reduce false positives, and improve integration with other security solutions. There is also a need for better resource management. Deep Instinct needs to expand Linux support, improve incident reporting, and provide more detailed logging. Enhancements in ease of deployment and patch management for specific OS environments are also needed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Malwarebytes Teams demonstrates versatility in deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds. Users generally report satisfaction with technical support, though complex issues can face delays. Deep Instinct has a simpler deployment process due to its single-agent approach, with some system integration challenges. Customer service is praised for thoroughness and responsiveness, with room for better user feedback engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes Teams is competitively priced but seen as slightly high without automatic entitlement to new features on premium licenses. Despite this, pricing aligns with the market offering middle-range value. Deep Instinct's pricing is more premium, justified by its advanced capabilities and reduced operational overhead, making it cost-effective for larger deployments. Favorable pricing for non-profits adds to its appeal. Both solutions show a positive ROI through effective security functions and reduced risk exposure.

To learn more, read our detailed Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.6%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Malwarebytes Teams is 1.8%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.6%
Malwarebytes Teams	1.8%
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform	1.0%
Other	93.6%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Tom Foal

CTO at Klaatu IT Security Ltd

Stops ransomware before it executes and reduces response time for the team

A potential area of improvement for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is their focus on file uploads and large data storage, backups, and other related areas. It is difficult to think of what they could improve, but low information provided by the system when it detects something is one area, particularly in scripting. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform detects malicious scripts but it needs better measures, perhaps signing scripts, so we can be sure that a script is created by a client, not by some malware. It is really about helping us triage incidents effectively, so a bit more help with the analysis of incidents, particularly what the Deep Instinct Prevention Platform agent has discovered, would be beneficial. We need to know what it has spotted that makes it suspect malware.

Read full review

reviewer2594097

Chief Executive Officer at a wholesaler/distributor with 11-50 employees

Exceptional malware protection with regular updates and behavior-based detection

There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity. The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it. Other customers have mentioned issues with false positives. It lacks enterprise-level management and more enterprise functionality. CrowdStrike and SentinelOne are much more enterprise-grade solutions. Malwarebytes has limited integration with cybersecurity tools and lacks enterprise integrations because it is not an enterprise product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The normal protection was really effective, and we detected situations that if we didn't have Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, it's highly likely that we would have been affected, but it protected the infrastructure."

"The scalability of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very good."

"Palo Alto is constantly adding new features."

"I can highlight that we have not faced any security incidents with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, and even though our environment is quite dynamic, we have not faced any security incident with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks until now."

"Its interface and pricing are most valuable, and it is better than other vendors in terms of security."

"I recommend this solution to others because it is easy to manage, reliable, and overall good to use."

"Overall, it's a great platform; it integrates very well with other solutions from Palo Alto and also with our vendors, the ease of use is excellent, I love the root cause analysis from Cortex, which is amazing, and in a few clicks you can have the full root cause."

"The most valuable feature is that you can select remote access of any machine for sandboxing."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Deep Instinct's detection rate is close to 100 percent."

"The most valuable features are the static/dynamic analyses; Deep Instinct's predictive model has very high accuracy and provides threat information for unknown malware, such as malware classification, static analysis information, and sandbox information."

"It has given us a more structured approach for detecting and preventing threats, with machine learning-based detection and prevention whose engines, even in older versions, are able to pick viruses and malware, supported by many online use cases for detecting different viruses and malware that have been out for many years."

"It has given us a more structured approach for detecting and preventing threats. It has machine learning-based detection and prevention. Their engines, in even older versions, are able to pick these viruses and malware. They have posted a lot of use cases online for detecting different viruses and malware that have been out for many years."

"Deep Instinct is very light; it doesn't take too much CPU attention or memory, it doesn't slow down the performance, and you don't really realize any change in the performance, which makes it very different from other solutions that are usually heavy for the users."

"Instead of having features like rollback and after-event actionable stuff, the whole premise and the context of the solution is to actually prevent these malicious attacks from happening to begin with.... The ability to prevent threats is the most appealing aspect. It absolutely, 100 percent helps with real-time prevention of unknown malware. That's the strength of the product."

"Its false positives are very low, because the behavior analysis engine double checks them."

"We think of this product as a fishing net that fits into the computer and has all of the capabilities and understanding of what ransomware and malware look like."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform pros

"We have seen a decrease of approximately ninety percent in the number of events."

"The behavior-based detection is very nice, and it combats zero-day threats by looking for anomalous behaviors."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to customize for different groups."

"It enhanced our performance in our company."

"It comprehensively finds and removes malicious software."

"We don't have to spend any time remediating bad things happening: Not viruses nor ransomware."

"The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the EDR and the complete feature set provided."

"The product provides notifications for suspicious events. We have several public access points. The product helps to prevent unauthorized entry. Its most valuable features are pre-installation procedures and a cloud console. The console's interface is simple and can be viewed easily to take action. It covers everything in terms of security threats."

More Malwarebytes Teams pros

Cons

"We have found that there are times Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks does not detect some of the viruses, we have to use another protection solution called Kaspersky."

"In terms of areas of improvement, we have not completed our review of the product. We're also looking at other products. So, it's a little bit hard to tell what could be different because we have not completed the review of this product, but based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

"Additionally, I think the price is very high, and if it can be adjusted, I believe it will be a very good solution."

"It'll help if customization was easier."

"The dashboard could use some significant improvement, just making it more useful with more information. It has a limited amount of information right now. It is customizable, but I'd love to see a better out-of-box dashboard."

"Cortex XDR is trickier to configure than other Palo Alto products. This is one area where we are not so satisfied."

"Currently, we are monitoring all USB drives and ports but we would like to improve our device control capabilities."

"We had a problem with getting our older endpoints up to date, but their newest updates have been really good. I've been pleased with it in terms of what our needs are. It's doing what we want it to do."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"I would like to see improvement in the user interface so that the user has more control. For example, it would be good if a user could change their grouping if they want to be part of another group. Or if I want to right-click and scan a specific file that I just imported, that would be helpful. Sometimes you just want to do an extra scan to make sure you're safe."

"If they can bring some additional, complementary solutions, like network scanning and the like, that will help. If they had some sort of a firewall which could help detect DDoS attacks and other things, it would be an improvement"

"If the tool was able to provide fine-tuning capabilities from the product's end depending on the environment of its user, then it would be a good improvement in the solution."

"I would like to see improvement in the user interface so that the user has more control."

"The Management Console is not localized."

"When things get done automatically, I would appreciate more logging of what's happening in the background... we should be able to backtrack from the log that gets uploaded to our cloud instance and see, forensically, what the root cause was."

"Some of the features are very resource intensive, such as the ransomware detection. It consumed so much of the resource on the endpoints that we have disabled those functions."

"The Management Console is not localized."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform cons

"We have noticed that when the solution is doing the scanning, all the scanning activities make the device heavier. It slows down your machine."

"The online reporting needs to be improved. Currently, we have to look at it online, and if we want to download a report, it just downloads as an Excel file. It's just raw information. There needs to be some way to better display it when it's downloaded."

"Every once in a while, the product gets clobbered. It's not just one thing. So, it could be a Microsoft update or a Kaspersky update."

"Malwarebytes is too simplistic. From a SOC IR perspective, it doesn't give you very much data around it."

"It would be better if updates could be downloaded, and deployed, on-premises to avoid low bandwidth causing issues."

"Requires increased efficiency in terms of detecting false positives."

"My clients have frequently encountered some tech support scams where when you go to a particular website, it throws up a fake warning to you and states that you need to call this number."

"It's not covering everything as we just started in EDR. In Malwarebytes, there's no response. The response is very limited, and integration is very limited."

More Malwarebytes Teams cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is $55 to $90 USD per endpoint per month."

"Cortex XDR's pricing is ok."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is an expensive solution."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

"The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help."

"The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive."

"I did PoCs on products called Cylance and CrowdStrike. Although, I consider these products and they were also good, when it come to cost and budgetary factors, Traps has been proven to be better than the other two products. It is quite cost-effective and delivers all the entire solution which we require."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Pricing and licensing are very straightforward. It's two SKUs, one is for the console and the other is for the client."

"Its pricing is too high, but that is not because of the product. It is expensive because of the cost of the console. You need a console to control the whole thing, but the console is expensive. You have to split this cost among all possible users. Normally, to be able to make it economically attractive, you need at least 1,000 agents, PCs, or users. If you have a customer with 300 to 500 agents, PCs, or users, it becomes too pricey."

"If I include the false positive rate and the detection rate in the comparison, Deep Instinct is worth its price."

"There is a need for customers of the product to pay towards the licensing costs of the tool."

"There are no additional costs on the price, and our company has a support contract, which bundles in those services anyway."

"The pricing is a little bit expensive but we are satisfied with DI's performance."

"In comparison to the other products out there, it's exceptionally competitively priced. When you consider the lower administrative overhead that it facilitates, it's an absolute value."

"One thing about their licensing program that I like is that just one covers the server as well as on the endpoint as well as mobile devices. There is no complexity in calculating how many SKUs I need for mobile, for laptop, for desktop, and for servers. It's very simple and that makes it much easier to budget."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform pricing and cost advice

"The licensing is per seat, with clients being a little less expensive than servers. If we need more licenses, we can accomplish that within a day. As Malwarebytes adds new features to their product, such as DNS filtering and a patching module, they want to charge us more even though we're a premium user, which isn't ideal."

"The price of Malwarebytes is in the middle range compared to other vendors."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"I would say that it's affordable. It costs much less than Sentinel One, CrowdStrike, or anything of that nature. But, at the same time, you are getting what you pay for. So I would say it's one of the best when you're comparing traditional NextGen AVs like Webroot that aren't the best in the bunch."

"Its cost is around $60 a machine. The cost of the total solution for 250 people is about $8,500 a year. If we add EDR to it, it will bring that cost up to about $15,000. The cost for Carbon Black is about $25,000, which is $10,000 more, but you get all AI functions with it."

"It is expensive."

"It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

More Malwarebytes Teams pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	48

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Deep Instinct?

The price for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is reasonable. It is about the same price as any other antivirus.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Deep Instinct?

A potential area of improvement for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is their focus on file uploads and large data s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Deep Instinct?

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is basically a stopper that prevents any malware, including zero-days. The main ben...

See all answers

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 7% of the time

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Morphisec vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

Kaspersky Small Office Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 3% of the time

More Malwarebytes Teams Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

May 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

May 2026

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform report

Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams

April 2026

Download Malwarebytes Teams product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform offers a prevent-first solution with a focus on detecting zero-day threats, featuring user-friendly deployment and robust cross-platform functionality. It integrates well with other security tools to enhance threat detection capabilities.

Deep Instinct leverages deep learning for advanced malware and ransomware prevention. Its lightweight design and easy deployment make it a favored choice for endpoint protection. While praised for its compatibility and minimal updates, challenges exist with Linux support, high resource use in ransomware detection, and the need for better control in administration. Organizations implementing Deep Instinct enjoy real-time prevention against threats like phishing and zero-day exploits.

What are the key features?

Prevent-First Approach: Focusing on preventing threats before they occur.
Deep Learning: Utilizing deep learning for superior malware detection.
User-Friendly Interface: Easy to navigate and deploy across platforms.
Minimal Updates: Requires fewer updates, ensuring consistent protection.
Cross-Platform Functionality: Supports multiple platforms for wider applicability.

What benefits should you consider?

Excellent Accuracy: High accuracy in detecting threats with minimal false positives.
Resource Efficiency: Optimized for low resource consumption during operation.
Integration Capability: Seamlessly integrates with other security strategies.
Real-Time Prevention: Offers real-time responses to emerging threats.

Deep Instinct finds implementation in industries needing robust endpoint protection, adopted by security consultants and resellers for client solutions. It serves managed services aiming to replace traditional antiviruses and safeguards against malware and phishing attacks.

Deep Instinct

Malwarebytes Teams provides advanced threat protection and efficient detection and removal capabilities, featuring cloud-based management and robust endpoint security. It operates on Windows and Mac, emphasizing threat interception and the cloud-management interface.

Offering comprehensive protection, Malwarebytes Teams is recognized for its customizable and user-friendly interface. The anti-exploit feature effectively intercepts threats in Office applications, while frequent updates maintain security standards. Efficient scanning, threat response, and rollback features are highly valued, as is its ability to integrate seamlessly into diverse environments. Remote accessibility and cloud management enhance its robust endpoint protection.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes Teams?

Comprehensive Threat Protection: Advanced detection and removal for malware.
Cloud-Based Management: Manage security conveniently from the cloud.
Anti-Exploit Feature: Protects against threats in Office applications.
Efficient Scanning: Quick and effective threat detection.
Threat Response and Rollback: Swift response with rollback capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Continuous updates and strong endpoint protection.
Integration Flexibility: Works well with existing environments.
Reporting Capabilities: Offers effective reporting and monitoring.
Remote Accessibility: Manage security from any location.

Malwarebytes Teams is widely implemented in cybersecurity across industries for endpoint security. Organizations deploy it for malware detection, intrusion protection, and compliance scanning, relying on its antivirus capabilities and ransomware rollback. It serves as a secondary tool alongside primary systems to enhance security on both Windows and Mac environments, particularly valued for monitoring usage behaviors without controlling endpoints.

Malwarebytes

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Knutson Construction

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams

April 2026

Free Report: Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams

Find out what your peers are saying about Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.