"The solution has the capability to scale well."
"If you want to do failover, it works without any problem."
"VMware SRM is a very nice tool for disaster recovery for virtual environments."
"The most valuable features are the disaster recovery and testing."
"The solution is simple to use and has effective automation."
"Our systems fail over using SRM. So, we do a big bang DR, which is biannual, and we fail over our fairly massive Epic electronic health record (EHR) and our core applications. It takes us about 30 minutes to fail over using SRM, which is pretty good. In most hospitals that have Epic installed, Epic does the audit to make sure that we can fail over if something were to happen. Normally, sites will have a DR solution specific to the EHR, but right now, our pain point is the third-party tier-one clinical applications."
"The most valuable feature is disaster recovery testing."
"The product is evolving and the vendor is committed to change."
"The UI is very user-friendly and testing is easy."
"I don't have any feedback to provide in terms of features that may be lacking."
"We have had an issue when some customers have traditional designs and sites. For example, on one another site, they are using hyper-converged, using VMware, or Nutanix. We have a problem with the synchronization between the storage for site to site. This is the main issue. We are adding some other tools to support the synchronization to allow the movement of the workload from site to site easily."
"This product is not appropriate for those moving to a broader cloud footprint."
"The solution could improve by removing some of the limitations we have been facing. There could be better integrated."
"There needs to be better stability during heavy capacity in future releases."
"The version we are currently using is not the latest and greatest but it has buggy behavior in some browsers."
"The configuration process could be improved."
"The two vCenters have to be synchronized, which sometimes gives us problems because Keberos does not tolerate more than five minutes in time difference."
"Sometimes it can cause a bit of downtime during switchovers."
Datto Cloud Continuity is ranked 14th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 1 review while VMware SRM is ranked 8th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 15 reviews. Datto Cloud Continuity is rated 8.0, while VMware SRM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Datto Cloud Continuity writes "Scalable with good data recovery capabilities and a simple design". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware SRM writes "Enables us to get a lot of server images successfully but it has connectivity issues with auto-recovery". Datto Cloud Continuity is most compared with Acronis Backup, Azure Site Recovery, Veeam Backup & Replication, Altaro VM Backup and Veeam Backup for Office 365, whereas VMware SRM is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, Azure Site Recovery and CloudEndure Live Migration.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
