Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DataMasque vs Securiti comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DataMasque
Ranking in Data Governance
28th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
3.7
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Data Masking (13th)
Securiti
Ranking in Data Governance
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (12th), Data Privacy Management Software (1st), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (10th), Data Detection & Response (DDR) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of DataMasque is 0.3%. The mindshare of Securiti is 2.0%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Securiti2.0%
DataMasque0.3%
Other97.7%
Data Governance
 

Featured Reviews

Nierojan Pushparajan - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Software Engineering at TelliHealth
Masking sensitive test data has improved compliance and now enables safe, realistic debugging
The best features DataMasque offers that stand out to me are the flexibility to create rule sets and mask UUIDs, which have been really beneficial. Additionally, their customer service and technical support have been very helpful in getting this set up. The flexibility in creating rule sets has helped my team specifically because we have lots of dependencies on different databases and different database types. We have an RDS instance and an OpenSearch instance. Having those rule sets really allowed us to connect data between the two because the same data can be across multiple datasets. Creating these rules enabled us to not think too much about which ones need to be unique or which ones need to be the same across different tables. Whenever we run into issues or questions, we are able to talk to the DataMasque team, and they give us a reasonable technical response within a good timeframe that allows us to solve our issues pretty quickly. We have not had huge delays or blockers because of the communication between us and DataMasque. I appreciate the consistency to continue to improve the application, and there are new features coming out this year that will be tools we use. DataMasque is doing a great job of adding new features, and we will definitely be using them in the future. DataMasque has positively impacted our organization by already showing visible benefits in security and reduced risks for compliance, even though we are still in the process of setting up production and using it to the full extent. It will allow our developers to troubleshoot issues easily without the risk of viewing PHI or anything similar. We are seeing the benefits already of that, but we still need to complete the full integration and incorporate it into our workflows to see the full benefits, which we are currently in the process of. So far, it has been really good. By just masking production data, we can go into this masked database set to understand edge cases and issues as they come up from support without the developers having to look at any production data. They can go into this masked dataset and see the problem firsthand, something we would not have caught with our dev dataset because it is such a smaller amount of data, whereas production has a vast amount of data that we can look through.
reviewer2765175 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Manager IT at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Have built a zero trust foundation that protects customer data and reduces business risk
To improve Securiti, I would say that ultimately the IT team as well as the business team, there has to be an amalgamation of their thought process, convergence of their thoughts, objectives, aspirations for achieving the business objective of a particular organization. The way forward is to form the fusion team wherein there is a judicious mix of business and IT and both the teams understand each other's limitations and the aspirations and the common objectives. As far as needed improvements in Securiti, I would say that automation is key. If you look at the kind of huge amount of data which SOC integrated devices are generating in terms of alerts, automation or the appropriate use of AI is the way forward. That will lead to the overall improvement in the efficiency as well as the threat intelligence will be much more accurate. To my mind, automation with the augmented use of GenAI or the agentic AI solution is the way forward. I choose eight for Securiti because for it to be a nine or 10, ultimately the uptime has to be improved, it should be nearing 100%. Apart from that, there has to be more unified communication happening between various customer facing applications. These siloed applications having their own kind of security solutions implemented also have to be brought on a uniform platform. Until that happens, there is always a gap which has to be filled. The processes within the SOC, whether it is SIEM, NBAD, or your DAM, alert analysis, logs analysis, these have to be predictive analysis, and the thwarting of the cyber attacks still requires more effort.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Being able to generate the masking rules directly from the tool based on what it finds during the data discovery helps ensure that all sensitive fields are identified and masked."
"DataMasque has positively impacted our organization by absolutely allowing us to more rigorously test our products within a safe environment without leaking personally identifiable information."
"We can now have a staging environment very much like a production environment, which improves our testing and product quality."
"DataMasque has positively impacted our organization by already showing visible benefits in security and reduced risks for compliance, even though we are still in the process of setting up production and using it to the full extent."
"Their data discovery is a fantastic product."
"Technical support for Securiti is good."
"I would recommend Securiti to others with challenges like obtaining human resources for timely classification."
"The quality of the learning that Securiti offers, especially considering that the courses are free, is incredible."
"Overall, I would rate Securiti a nine out of ten."
"Data discovery is a fantastic product."
"It's very scalable. I would rate it ten out of ten for scalability."
"With that kind of high availability and the continuous threat exposure management, CTEM, we are quite sure and we have proved our worth to the business in implementing the cyber security solutions."
 

Cons

"I think it would be great if the user experience was upgraded because it can be quite technical at times."
"UUID generation could be improved."
"Technical support can be hit or miss. Some technical staff are great, but others are not very effective. On average, I would rate the technical support four out of ten."
"It's not very fast, and it's difficult to get an answer."
"One limitation of Securiti is that it can only classify about 30% to 40% of my data."
"While the software is functionally robust and intuitive, there is a challenging learning curve."
"I choose eight for Securiti because for it to be a nine or 10, ultimately the uptime has to be improved, it should be nearing 100%."
"I would like their workflows and assessment automation to be more advanced compared to their competitors, especially under the pro core privacy module."
"With the formation and education, specifically the security education, they could update the educational video more often."
"Technical support needs enhancement. It would be helpful to have better documentation and more accessible support, especially when raising support tickets."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
45%
Computer Software Company
12%
Marketing Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DataMasque?
The DM team was very happy to work with us when we were determining the pricing and licensing model we wanted to use.
What needs improvement with DataMasque?
I think it would be great if the user experience was upgraded because it can be quite technical at times. The user interface could benefit from an upgrade as it can be quite technical at times. I d...
What is your primary use case for DataMasque?
I use the solution to mask production data and restore it into a QA environment.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Securiti?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was great because it was all completely free.
What needs improvement with Securiti?
There is nothing about Securiti's learning packages or the platform that I would change or improve.
What is your primary use case for Securiti?
My main use case for Securiti is their learning packages for training. I have used Securiti's learning packages to upskill myself on data governance relating to AI.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about DataMasque vs. Securiti and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.