DataMasque vs Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager comparison

DataMasque vs. Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DataMasque

Ranking in Data Governance

30th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

3.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Masking (9th)

Microsoft Purview Complianc...

Ranking in Data Governance

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of DataMasque is 0.4%. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager	1.1%
DataMasque	0.4%
Other	98.5%

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Nierojan Pushparajan

Director of Software Engineering at TelliHealth

Masking sensitive test data has improved compliance and now enables safe, realistic debugging

The best features DataMasque offers that stand out to me are the flexibility to create rule sets and mask UUIDs, which have been really beneficial. Additionally, their customer service and technical support have been very helpful in getting this set up. The flexibility in creating rule sets has helped my team specifically because we have lots of dependencies on different databases and different database types. We have an RDS instance and an OpenSearch instance. Having those rule sets really allowed us to connect data between the two because the same data can be across multiple datasets. Creating these rules enabled us to not think too much about which ones need to be unique or which ones need to be the same across different tables. Whenever we run into issues or questions, we are able to talk to the DataMasque team, and they give us a reasonable technical response within a good timeframe that allows us to solve our issues pretty quickly. We have not had huge delays or blockers because of the communication between us and DataMasque. I appreciate the consistency to continue to improve the application, and there are new features coming out this year that will be tools we use. DataMasque is doing a great job of adding new features, and we will definitely be using them in the future. DataMasque has positively impacted our organization by already showing visible benefits in security and reduced risks for compliance, even though we are still in the process of setting up production and using it to the full extent. It will allow our developers to troubleshoot issues easily without the risk of viewing PHI or anything similar. We are seeing the benefits already of that, but we still need to complete the full integration and incorporate it into our workflows to see the full benefits, which we are currently in the process of. So far, it has been really good. By just masking production data, we can go into this masked database set to understand edge cases and issues as they come up from support without the developers having to look at any production data. They can go into this masked dataset and see the problem firsthand, something we would not have caught with our dev dataset because it is such a smaller amount of data, whereas production has a vast amount of data that we can look through.

Read full review

reviewer2797275

Systems Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 201-500 employees

Compliance reporting has provided governance insights and now needs faster expert support access

I would rate Microsoft Support a six or seven on a scale of one to ten, depending on who you get. Microsoft could potentially improve by being able to reach the right people immediately instead of having to deal with lower-level support staff. As an enterprise customer, having that enterprise liaison is beneficial. I have a single point of contact for issues. Previously, when this was first set up without that liaison, calling support meant getting level one support who could not help, then level two support who also could not help, and finally reaching someone who could actually assist. Having a designated Microsoft representative or support person is definitely key.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"DataMasque has positively impacted our organization by absolutely allowing us to more rigorously test our products within a safe environment without leaking personally identifiable information."

"We can now have a staging environment very much like a production environment, which improves our testing and product quality."

"Being able to generate the masking rules directly from the tool based on what it finds during the data discovery helps ensure that all sensitive fields are identified and masked."

"DataMasque has positively impacted our organization by already showing visible benefits in security and reduced risks for compliance, even though we are still in the process of setting up production and using it to the full extent."

"The data classification reporting is helping us figure out what and where our people are storing files and why."

"We have more visibility of data and how it is being shared."

"Purview delivers data protection across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments."

"We move data between clouds and also from on-premises to the cloud. There is no other mechanism to check if this data is moving according to industry standards for such things as security, bandwidth, and SSL encryption mechanism. We would not be able to see these metrics without Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager."

"Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is necessary when using Outlook."

"The stability is a ten out of ten."

"Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager's eDiscovery is essential for organizations using Outlook as their email service."

"The setup complexity depends on what features you want to implement in Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager."

More Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager pros

Cons

"I think it would be great if the user experience was upgraded because it can be quite technical at times."

"UUID generation could be improved."

"The speed and accessibility, particularly in the user interface, require significant work."

"The customer service experience is not satisfactory. The support staff, who are often outsourced, seem not adequately equipped to handle issues quickly and efficiently."

"One area for improvement is the technical support for Purview. With all the other solutions from Microsoft we get really good technical support, but with Purview we had a compliance error and we couldn't find the solution. Purview would not point us to the correct solution, it just indicated the error. We had to troubleshoot it and find out what led to this error. We contacted technical support but it took them one week to identify the root cause of the error."

"When I tried to set up Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager for my organization to ensure people are not sending PII documents, especially payment cards, using keywords for flagging, it disrupted our services, so we had to deactivate it."

"Policy configuration, particularly for web interfaces and OCR scanning, presents challenges."

"We'd like to see the solution expanded to include firewalls and endpoints."

"There could be improved automation for handling tasks in bulk or in an automated way."

"Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager is a stable product used by organizations utilizing Outlook as their email client. Despite stability, it needs to be more user-friendly and competitive compared to other eDiscovery tools."

More Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing and licensing are moderate because we have other licenses for Microsoft services. The pricing is in line with that."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

26%

Construction Company

21%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DataMasque?

As we are still in the early stages, I can't say anything definitive about pricing yet, but I believe it will be usage-based, which should work well.

What needs improvement with DataMasque?

UUID generation could be improved. Although UUIDs were masked correctly, some validation rules were not supported, requiring a switch from validators to pattern matching. Expanding native UUID vali...

What is your primary use case for DataMasque?

I created a staging environment with production-like data.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager?

The pricing and setup cost is comparable to everything else that would be available regarding licensing. It was not excessively expensive. It is another expense to manage, but paying for the soluti...

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager?

Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager is used for governance and checking to ensure that what is being put out there is correct and is not violating any corporate policies. We use it for data classi...

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager?

I have experience with IronScales by chance or other similar products. It was not purchased through AWS Marketplace but was purchased through a vendor. We do deal with Intune with Microsoft. I have...

Vanta vs Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager

Comparisons

No data available

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Collibra Platform vs Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager

Compared 10% of the time

BigID Next vs Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager

Compared 9% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Data Masking

Download DataMasque product report

Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager

Download Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager product report

Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Compliance Manager

Overview

DataMasque offers robust data masking, maintaining referential integrity while ensuring security and compliance. Its features support realistic dataset testing without exposing sensitive data, integrating seamlessly across databases.

DataMasque is designed to protect PII and PHI by masking sensitive information across interconnected databases and cloud platforms. This ensures applications, reporting, and integrations are not impacted by structural inconsistencies. Its adaptable rule set and auto-generation of masking rules aid in swift deployment, enhancing data security frameworks and accelerating release cycles. DataMasque also provides strong technical support and continues to enhance its capabilities with ongoing improvements. Users find value in its existing functionality while looking forward to further usability enhancements, including expanded capabilities for unstructured data and improved post-masking validation.

What Are DataMasque's Main Features?

Identical Data Masking: Ensures masked data retains the appearance and formatting of original data, enhancing usability.
Referential Integrity Preservation: Maintains data relationships across systems, crucial for accurate testing and reporting.
Automation: Facilitates seamless integration and efficient masking operations without manual intervention.
Scalability: Supports growth and handles large datasets across distributed environments.
Compliance and Security Alignment: Helps meet regulatory requirements like GDPR while maintaining robust security.
Speed and Accuracy: Guarantees rapid data processing with precise masking rule application.
Rule Set Flexibility: Offers custom rules to adapt to specific data structures and needs.
Auto-Generation of Masking Rules: Automatically creates rules, speeding up deployment and reducing configuration errors.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Consider?

Data Security Enhancement: Significantly reduces the risk of data breaches by masking PII and PHI.
Improved Compliance: Aligns with regulatory standards, helping avoid legal and financial penalties.
Faster Release Cycles: Reduces time to market by enabling secure, realistic testing environments.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes hazards associated with data exposure in non-production environments.
Integration Ease: Smoothly integrates across databases, maintaining consistency and accuracy.

DataMasque is implemented across technology, healthcare, finance, and retail industries to safeguard sensitive data without disrupting operations. It assures that development, testing, and analytics use environments that mirror live systems closely, which is critical for sectors handling large volumes of personal data.

DataMasque

Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager simplifies compliance management by offering features such as data classification, labeling, and insider threat protection, facilitating adherence to global regulations and enhancing data security across multi-cloud environments.

Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager integrates effectively with Microsoft tools to provide real-time data use and threat alerts, enhancing data loss prevention and custom compliance policy establishment. Through AI and automation, it reduces time and costs, while its comprehensive reporting tools offer vital insights into compliance metrics. The platform supports integration across platforms, providing robust control over data security, although users suggest improvements in areas like user interface speed, policy configuration, and additional integration with firewalls and endpoints.

What are the key features of Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager?

Data Classification: Categorizes data based on sensitivity to enhance security.
Labeling: Allows for systematic data organization and management.
Insider Threat Protection: Detects and mitigates risks from internal sources.
Multi-Cloud Support: Functions across different cloud providers for seamless operations.
Integration with Microsoft Tools: Leverages existing tools for enhanced functionality.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides immediate data use and threat notifications.

What are the potential benefits or ROI of using Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager?

Regulatory Compliance: Supports adherence to global standards like GDPR.
Enhanced Data Security: Strengthens defenses against unauthorized accesses and leaks.
Time and Cost Efficiency: AI-driven automation optimizes processes.
Insightful Reporting: Delivers comprehensive insights for informed decision-making.
Custom Policy Creation: Enables tailored compliance strategies.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and legal services, organizations implement Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager to ensure data protection and compliance with international and sector-specific regulations. By assisting in data audits, managing document integrity, preventing unauthorized transfers, and supporting eDiscovery, it helps organizations maintain secure and compliant operational environments while monitoring data flows to protect against breaches.

Microsoft

DataMasque vs. Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager