CucumberStudio vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec comparison

SmartBear and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. SmartBear is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.3, while Rapid7 is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.9. SmartBear holds a 0.6% mindshare in DAST, compared to Rapid7’s 12.0% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

CucumberStudio

Read 12 CucumberStudio reviews

14 Views
8 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Read 18 Rapid7 InsightAppSec reviews

375 Views
257 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

CucumberStudio

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2024

CucumberStudio and Rapid7 InsightAppSec are tools in the software development and cybersecurity categories, respectively. Rapid7 InsightAppSec has the upper hand due to its superior features and comprehensive security functionalities.

Features: CucumberStudio is praised for its collaboration tools, behavior-driven development capabilities, and seamless integration into agile workflows. Rapid7 InsightAppSec is recognized for its comprehensive security testing, detailed reporting, and effective vulnerability management.

Room for Improvement:CucumberStudio could benefit from enhanced automation, better integration with other tools, and improved performance speed. Rapid7 InsightAppSec would improve with faster performance, a more user-friendly setup process, and a more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:CucumberStudio is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Rapid7 InsightAppSec, while offering solid deployment options, receives mixed feedback on customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI:CucumberStudio is considered budget-friendly with satisfactory ROI and minimal setup costs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec, despite its higher cost, justifies the expense through its comprehensive feature set, providing substantial long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CucumberStudio vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CucumberStudio vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CucumberStudio

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (28th)

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of CucumberStudio is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightAppSec is 12.0%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

Walter Wirch

Technical Expert at Bertelsmann SE & Co.

Facilitates integration of test scenarios while needing modernization of components

CucumberStudio is primarily used for designing test scenarios and automating testing. We have implemented it in conjunction with our own routines for integration into our infrastructure CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing. It supports our product owners in designing…

Read full review

Krzysztof Witko

IT Security Engineer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Automated authorization streamlines security processes

The previous product, AppSpyder, had a virtual patching module where we could generate patches for third-party web application firewalls, such as Imperva or F5. Currently, InsightAppSec lacks similar functionality. Customers must wait for remediation during the developers' preparation of a new version. Virtual patching could help protect web pages shortly after finishing the scan process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."

"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."

"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."

"The most valuable feature of CucumberStudio is its use of action words, which allows me to avoid writing test cases from scratch for the most common scenarios."

"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."

"The URL is very useful, and it has a very good UI for deploying information of the scenarios created."

"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."

"The solution is stable."

"Dynamic application security scanning provides predefined templates and supports customization. The ability to scan external and internal applications, including on-premises ones, is precious. Additionally, it is a cloud platform, so we don't need to deploy servers or resources. This makes it time-efficient and cost-effective."

"When considering DAST, it is not attributed to a singular feature but rather the capabilities of the engine that provides a genuine penetration testing experience and delivers insightful reports."

"You have various attack modules, and you also have the Attack Replay feature for the attack sequence. You can reproduce an attack and see it. That is a very good feature I noticed in this solution. It helps developers as well."

"The initial setup for us was easy enough. We didn't face too many issues. Deployment took maybe 30 minutes. It's quite quick and doesn't cause too much trouble at the outset."

"The templates feature is very easy. You just choose the kind of attack you want on your web application, and you run it against that template and receive a report. It's great."

"It uses a signature-based method to check for problems with your code and will provide an alert if anything is found."

"It is very convenient to get reports from the tool, which offers high-level environmental statistics."

"It is a very robust solution."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec pros

Cons

"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."

"A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher."

"The reporting needs to be improved."

"A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher."

"I would like to see better customer support."

"Another kind of deployment might be useful, perhaps an option to install the tool in a local deployment."

"CucumberStudio's API integration could be improved both in terms of reliability and design."

"The interface should be a little bit easier to manage. Sometimes, the logic that they use is kind of strange. They need to work a little bit more on their interface to make it more understandable. The interface is the only problem. I'm using Rapid7, which is very intuitive. There are other applications available in the market with a better interface. They can include more techniques or options to test different types of security because the templates are limited. It would be great to see them follow the MITRE ATT&CK framework or what is there in tools like Veracode and Synopsys."

"We get a lot of false positives during the tests."

"The product’s pricing could be flexible."

"I would like more details of what the product can do."

"When you add new projects for the same product, it either duplicates or replaces the scan configuration. If I run a scan for the same product with a different scan configuration, it should keep the previous scan configuration and not replace it with the new scan configuration. It should just add the new scan configuration. That would be helpful. They do keep the results as it is, but the scan configuration keeps changing. For example, I have set a scan configuration to a full scan, and next week, I want to run a new scan for the same product with some changes or new functionalities. I want to run a partial scan. Currently, if I change the scan configuration to partial, it changes the old one also to partial. That should be improved."

"The number of web applications we can scan is limited."

"They should add more features. I would like to see them do a little more on static analysis and also interactivity analysis. Currently, it does very basic static analysis. It could do a little more static analysis, which is something that would help. A lot more interactivity analysis should also be there. It should basically look at security during interactivity."

"Currently, InsightAppSec lacks similar functionality. Customers must wait for remediation during the developers' preparation of a new version."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"They offer a good price, but I don't remember its cost. It is fair as compared to the competition. We have opted for project-based licensing, not user-based. We can add any number of users. That doesn't matter. It is worth the money."

"I rate Rapid7 InsightAppSec’s pricing an eight out of ten."

"Its price is competitive. It is not expensive."

"I'm not sure how much it costs exactly, but I know it's expensive."

"The price of this product is very cheap."

"Rapid7 InsightAppSec is cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hiptest?

The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hiptest?

A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher. Introducing modern technology could improve the platform. API-based solutions are present but could benefit fr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hiptest?

CucumberStudio is primarily used for designing test scenarios and automating testing. We have implemented it in conjunction with our own routines for integration into our infrastructure.

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

In Rapid7 InsightAppSec, a distinctive feature is the provision of a CDM for integrating web servers and web applications. To establish the connection between these applications, you only need to p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

Currently, I do not see any specific areas for improvement except for possibly lowering the price.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

I use Rapid7 InsightAppSec ( /products/rapid7-insightappsec-reviews ) for dynamic application security testing. My main focus is on the quality of detection, specifically detecting vulnerabilities ...

See all answers

Comparisons

TestRail vs CucumberStudio

Compared 100% of the time

More CucumberStudio Competitors

Rapid7 AppSpider vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 30% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 14% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 12% of the time

Acunetix vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 10% of the time

Invicti vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 6% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

March 2025

Download CucumberStudio product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

April 2025

Download Rapid7 InsightAppSec product report

Also Known As

Hiptest

InsightAppSec

Overview

Formerly HipTest: CucumberStudio is the leading collaboration platform for BDD - an easy-to-use tool to define ideas, test code, and learn in production from real-time insight.

SmartBear

Your web applications may be complex, but your application security testing tool doesn’t need to be. InsightAppSec brings Rapid7’s proven Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) technology to the Insight platform, combining powerful application crawling and attack capabilities, flexibility in scan scope and scheduling, and accuracy in results with a modern UI, intuitive workflows, and sensible data organization. This enables you to identify XSS, SQL injection, CSRF, and other vulnerabilities with unparalleled ease. The best part? All of these capabilities are delivered via the cloud so that you’re up and running in minutes to identify the critical security risks that exist in your applications.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, Deliveroo

CenterPoint Energy, CPA Australia, Hypertherm, First American Financial Corporation, Rackspace

Buyer's Guide

CucumberStudio vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

April 2025

Free Report: CucumberStudio vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Find out what your peers are saying about CucumberStudio vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CucumberStudio vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec report.

See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.