CucumberStudio vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec comparison

SmartBear and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. SmartBear is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.5, while Rapid7 is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. SmartBear holds a 0.7% mindshare in DAST, compared to Rapid7’s 9.4% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

CucumberStudio

Read 12 CucumberStudio reviews

392 Views
27 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Read 19 Rapid7 InsightAppSec reviews

1,577 Views
426 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

CucumberStudio

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2024

CucumberStudio and Rapid7 InsightAppSec are tools in the software development and cybersecurity categories, respectively. Rapid7 InsightAppSec has the upper hand due to its superior features and comprehensive security functionalities.

Features: CucumberStudio is praised for its collaboration tools, behavior-driven development capabilities, and seamless integration into agile workflows. Rapid7 InsightAppSec is recognized for its comprehensive security testing, detailed reporting, and effective vulnerability management.

Room for Improvement:CucumberStudio could benefit from enhanced automation, better integration with other tools, and improved performance speed. Rapid7 InsightAppSec would improve with faster performance, a more user-friendly setup process, and a more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:CucumberStudio is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Rapid7 InsightAppSec, while offering solid deployment options, receives mixed feedback on customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI:CucumberStudio is considered budget-friendly with satisfactory ROI and minimal setup costs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec, despite its higher cost, justifies the expense through its comprehensive feature set, providing substantial long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CucumberStudio vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CucumberStudio vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CucumberStudio

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (26th)

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of CucumberStudio is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightAppSec is 9.4%, up from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

Walter Wirch

Technical Expert at Bertelsmann SE & Co.

Facilitates integration of test scenarios while needing modernization of components

CucumberStudio is primarily used for designing test scenarios and automating testing. We have implemented it in conjunction with our own routines for integration into our infrastructure CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing. It supports our product owners in designing…

Read full review

Shritam Bhowmick

Vulnerability Management Lead at garrett

Provides reliable applications security but needs better integration options

There are areas for improvements regarding false positives. Integration capabilities are lacking, as options for integrations with other tools such as SNOW, Jira, or other integration tools are not sufficient in Rapid7 InsightAppSec. The user interface sometimes has glitches, which may prevent appropriate results during navigation, and even when we get appropriate results, it can be impossible to export them to CSV records or download files. Regarding scalability, Rapid7 InsightAppSec is not a scalable solution for our industry due to limited integration capabilities. Rapid7 relies on another tool called InsightConnect, which requires additional investment, detracting from scalability. Another area that needs improvement is the integration of AI capabilities into the platform. Both Rapid7 InsightAppSec and InsightVM need to advance in that area. In terms of behavioral and pattern recognition, identifying complex attacks such as SQL, blind SQL, JSON, and LDAP injections often results in 94% false positives. This necessitates improvement in their behavioral-based analytics feature.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."

"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."

"The URL is very useful, and it has a very good UI for deploying information of the scenarios created."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature of CucumberStudio is its use of action words, which allows me to avoid writing test cases from scratch for the most common scenarios."

"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."

"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."

"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."

"The initial setup for us was easy enough. We didn't face too many issues. Deployment took maybe 30 minutes. It's quite quick and doesn't cause too much trouble at the outset."

"Relatively speaking, InsightAppSec is good compared to Insight VM."

"The solution is stable."

"The reporting functionality is excellent."

"We have seen measurable decrease in the mean time to respond to threats by 20 percent."

"Dynamic application security scanning provides predefined templates and supports customization. The ability to scan external and internal applications, including on-premises ones, is precious. Additionally, it is a cloud platform, so we don't need to deploy servers or resources. This makes it time-efficient and cost-effective."

"It's very easy to use and user-friendly. It does the job."

"Relatively speaking, InsightAppSec is good compared to Insight VM."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec pros

Cons

"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."

"Another kind of deployment might be useful, perhaps an option to install the tool in a local deployment."

"The reporting needs to be improved."

"CucumberStudio's API integration could be improved both in terms of reliability and design."

"A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher."

"I would like to see better customer support."

"A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher."

"There is room for improvement in the response time of customer service and support levels."

"I would like more details of what the product can do."

"Currently, InsightAppSec lacks similar functionality. Customers must wait for remediation during the developers' preparation of a new version."

"When you add new projects for the same product, it either duplicates or replaces the scan configuration. If I run a scan for the same product with a different scan configuration, it should keep the previous scan configuration and not replace it with the new scan configuration. It should just add the new scan configuration. That would be helpful. They do keep the results as it is, but the scan configuration keeps changing. For example, I have set a scan configuration to a full scan, and next week, I want to run a new scan for the same product with some changes or new functionalities. I want to run a partial scan. Currently, if I change the scan configuration to partial, it changes the old one also to partial. That should be improved."

"The number of web applications we can scan is limited."

"The interface should be a little bit easier to manage. Sometimes, the logic that they use is kind of strange. They need to work a little bit more on their interface to make it more understandable. The interface is the only problem. I'm using Rapid7, which is very intuitive. There are other applications available in the market with a better interface. They can include more techniques or options to test different types of security because the templates are limited. It would be great to see them follow the MITRE ATT&CK framework or what is there in tools like Veracode and Synopsys."

"There is room for improvement in Rapid7 InsightAppSec by giving clients the ability for extra columns on reports and enabling the extraction of remediation reports into a CSV format. Currently, the PDF format is cumbersome to go through when dealing with thousands of pages."

"The reporting feature of Rapid7 InsightAppSec needs improvement as it currently provides basic reports."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"They offer a good price, but I don't remember its cost. It is fair as compared to the competition. We have opted for project-based licensing, not user-based. We can add any number of users. That doesn't matter. It is worth the money."

"I'm not sure how much it costs exactly, but I know it's expensive."

"Its price is competitive. It is not expensive."

"Rapid7 InsightAppSec is cheap."

"I rate Rapid7 InsightAppSec’s pricing an eight out of ten."

"The price of this product is very cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

22%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Transportation Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hiptest?

CucumberStudio's API integration could be improved both in terms of reliability and design. The API requires data to be sent in a specific format, which takes time to build. Additionally, the repor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hiptest?

I use CucumberStudio as a test case repository. All of our test cases are stored there. It is also part of our test planning process. For every sprint, we plan the test cases in CucumberStudio and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Hiptest?

For teams following a BDD style software development approach, CucumberStudio is a great collaborative tool that covers all the basic requirements of a test management tool. I would rate CucumberSt...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

In Rapid7 InsightAppSec, a distinctive feature is the provision of a CDM for integrating web servers and web applications. To establish the connection between these applications, you only need to p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

Our main use case for Rapid7 InsightAppSec is to perform internal assessment of applications and external facing applications. We have a cloud engine plus on-premises engine, and we have been lever...

See all answers

Comparisons

TestRail vs CucumberStudio

Compared 61% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs CucumberStudio

Compared 39% of the time

More CucumberStudio Competitors

Rapid7 AppSpider vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 30% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 14% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 11% of the time

Acunetix vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 9% of the time

Invicti vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 8% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

August 2025

Download CucumberStudio product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

August 2025

Download Rapid7 InsightAppSec product report

Also Known As

Hiptest

InsightAppSec

Overview

Formerly HipTest: CucumberStudio is the leading collaboration platform for BDD - an easy-to-use tool to define ideas, test code, and learn in production from real-time insight.

SmartBear

Your web applications may be complex, but your application security testing tool doesn’t need to be. InsightAppSec brings Rapid7’s proven Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) technology to the Insight platform, combining powerful application crawling and attack capabilities, flexibility in scan scope and scheduling, and accuracy in results with a modern UI, intuitive workflows, and sensible data organization. This enables you to identify XSS, SQL injection, CSRF, and other vulnerabilities with unparalleled ease. The best part? All of these capabilities are delivered via the cloud so that you’re up and running in minutes to identify the critical security risks that exist in your applications.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, Deliveroo

CenterPoint Energy, CPA Australia, Hypertherm, First American Financial Corporation, Rackspace

Buyer's Guide

CucumberStudio vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

July 2025

Free Report: CucumberStudio vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Find out what your peers are saying about CucumberStudio vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CucumberStudio vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec report.

See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.