CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

CrowdStrike and Microsoft are both solutions in the Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) category. Additionally, 94% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Se...

Read 40 CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security reviews

14,744 Views
1,474 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra Permissions...

Read 2 Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Se...

Microsoft Entra Permissions...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 25, 2025

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and Microsoft Entra Permissions Management EOL are competing products in cybersecurity, focusing on cloud security and permission management. CrowdStrike tends to have an advantage in pricing and support, while Microsoft Entra is favored for its comprehensive features and perceived long-term value.

Features: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security offers real-time threat intelligence, advanced endpoint protection, and holistic visibility across cloud environments. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management EOL is known for its identity-centric access management, integration with Microsoft products, and comprehensive permissions oversight. CrowdStrike focuses on threat detection, whereas Microsoft Entra emphasizes identity and permissions security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is recognized for straightforward deployment and robust customer support. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management EOL integrates well within Microsoft ecosystems but is sometimes perceived as less intuitive during deployment. Microsoft offers a cohesive experience for existing users.

Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security provides competitive pricing models with a favorable cost-to-benefit ratio, offering a strong return on investment through advanced security offerings. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management EOL might have higher initial setup costs but delivers strong ROI due to its enhanced security posture and integration advantages. CrowdStrike may be initially affordable, but Microsoft Entra is seen as offering greater long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,223 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Se...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Container Security (10th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (9th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (9th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (9th), Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (9th)

Microsoft Entra Permissions...

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Manish Indupuri

senior DevOps engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Provides centralized visibility and real-time threat detection across multiple cloud accounts

Regarding how CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security can be improved, I would say they can improve their support. There were a couple of cases where we needed to escalate issues in order to get proper support. That part could use some tweaking on their end. Additionally, the recent incident during the last summer literally impacted our systems. We had some of our workloads that affected the business, and it was a difficult experience. Apart from that, it is a good tool and the experience with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security has been excellent. We did not find any kind of issues, but if they could improve their response to security-related incidents and provide on-time support or better understand our concerns and address them accordingly, it could be very helpful. Regarding needed improvements, I think they should enhance automatic alerting with CI/CD scanning and reporting capabilities. Additionally, it would be better to implement Falcon sensor health monitoring so agents are always active. We could know how it is behaving and how it is treating our environment. That could be a little helpful.

Read full review

Sameer Bhat

Vice President at Goldman Sachs

Provides resource-based access and security, but time-bound access can be a problem

Entra ID is the core of the identity management that we have. This is the key product that we are using. I am currently also looking into Entra Private Access because we are planning to deploy about 50,000 desktops into Azure and use Azure Virtual Desktop. We would like to give access to the users from the desktop to on-premises applications. I learned that Entra Private Access is a good solution. That is not yet GA, but that is what we are looking for. Entra provides a single pane of glass for managing user access, but because our company also integrates with Nebula API, only administrators use Entra's pane. A normal person who wants to get onboarded can do self-service using Nebula. The features for whitelisting and other things are definitely there. That is what we use specifically. Application IDs, enterprise applications, and all those things are already there, so we have more efficiency. There is also security because we usually do not allow user identities to get direct access to Azure resources. Usually, we use the service principles from Entra ID, so this way, it increases security. Entra has helped to save time for our IT administrators. We tend to automate a lot of things. We can do automation using Graph APIs and save time. It is hard to quantify the time savings, but there has been a medium amount of time savings. Entra has helped to save our organization money. We care about security and risk more than money, but it also saves money. We are premium customers, and because we have a commit-to-consume contract with Microsoft of multi-million dollars, the money does not come into it because we have to consume those resources.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon include its automation capabilities, efficacy, and lower risk."

"Cloud security is one valuable feature. Spotlight is the other one. There is also vulnerability management and a couple of more features."

"Falcon is a cloud-based technology, so its resource usage is light. You deploy the agents to your endpoints, but the processing is done on the cloud, so you're CPU utilization is only about 2 percent. Some others solutions use between 30 to 60 percent."

"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is user-friendly."

"CrowdStrike utilizes signatureless technology, eliminating the need for regular signature updates on endpoint systems."

"Technical support is helpful."

"It provides alerts on suspicious command executions, helping us safeguard our systems."

"We like the solution's management and monitoring tools for our network. We use it to monitor our network between workstations and outside our organization. The AI provides useful visualizations of our network on a dashboard."

More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security pros

"The solution integrates well with our infrastructure and other systems without any issues."

"Multifactor authentication is valuable."

Cons

"I suggest improvements for CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security in areas including vulnerability management and a more straightforward agent troubleshooting process."

"The improvements needed for CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security include reducing its high cost, which is currently quite expensive, and enhancing the executive reports that are user-friendly for technical engineers but require improvement for higher management."

"The only challenge lies in token verification."

"The CrowdStrike dashboard currently lacks a username field."

"Incorporating threat intelligence into the system would be a valuable addition."

"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is expensive."

"It gets the work done, but the main problem with the solution is that if you remediate anything, it takes 45 days for you to get any of the features displayed on the dashboard. This is the real weakness of CrowdStrike. Their customer support is also not ready to help with it. If you remediate any cloud vulnerability that they are giving you, such as removing a host from your organization, it takes around 45 days for them to remove it from their console."

"Different file options should be available, and clients should be able to select from the options."

More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security cons

"The solution's pricing and support services need improvement."

"We use a third-party API called Nebula API to integrate the account for authorization. The time-bound access area in Entra can be a problem. It can be improved in terms of the granularity of the permissions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is pricy."

"The pricing is reasonable, neither overly expensive nor excessively cheap, making it competitive compared to other market options."

"Its price is moderate."

"It's an expensive product"

"The price is not too high, it is okay."

"I am not the one who handled the pricing. A different team worked on it, but it is pretty expensive."

"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is very expensive for us. Last month, we had a big issue that took much time and money to resolve. It slowed down our business and required our management team to get involved. We had a problem similar to the "Blue Screen of Death" issue many US companies faced. This incident used up many of our IT resources in just a few months. That's why we're looking for a replacement tool now."

"CrowdStrike Falcon is very expensive."

More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security pricing and cost advice

"We are a Fortune 500 company, so we always negotiate with Microsoft."

"The product cost is in the mid to high range."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM?

I believe that CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is not expensive for United States-based companies. For Brazil, however, this pricing is very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM?

I am aware that just as we have a one-click sensor for faster deployment of the agent, there is probably a tool that will be available to deploy the sensor for container security. Falcon CAC and Fa...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM?

We use cloud security comprehensively, including CSPM, DSPM, AISPM, and CDR, not just for our organization, but because we are partners and provide services for our customers who are using cloud se...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Wiz vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

Compared 4% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

Compared 4% of the time

AWS Security Hub vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

Compared 3% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Competitors

TrendAI Vision One – Cloud Security vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

October 2026

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security report

Download CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)

October 2026

Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] report

Download Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] product report

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM

CloudKnox Permissions Management

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security helps organizations stop cloud breaches from code to runtime. As CrowdStrike's cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP), it combines real-time cloud detection and response with proactive cloud security to help security teams prevent, detect, investigate, and stop modern cloud attacks.

Industry-leading threat intelligence and AI-powered insights help security teams understand how adversaries operate, uncover evasive threats, and respond with confidence. The result is a stronger cloud security posture, faster investigations, and reduced mean time to detect and respond.

What are CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security's key features?

Real-Time Protection: Detects and responds to cloud attacks in real time.
Industry-Leading Adversary Intelligence: Turns intel into prioritized risk and threats.
Cloud Asset Visibility: Discovers and maps assets across the entire cloud estate.
Preemptive Security: Identities risks earlier in development to prevent insecure deployments.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Faster Threat Detection and Response: Achieve up to 89% faster cloud detection and response
Improved Cloud Security Posture: Identify and prioritize high-risk vulnerabilities and misconfigurations faster
Reduce Blind Spots: Gain up to 72% faster ability to monitor the entire cloud estate
Compliance Assurance: Aids in maintaining industry standards.
Return on Investment: 264% Return on Investment over 3 year period

Organizations use Falcon Cloud Security to stop cloud breaches from code to runtime. It helps teams reduce blind spots, focus on the risks most likely to lead to a breach, and detect and respond to attacks faster. By connecting proactive cloud security with real-time detection and response, it strengthens security from development through production.

CrowdStrike

Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] provides robust access control and identity management, enhancing security by optimizing permissions and reducing risk.

This advanced platform offers comprehensive capabilities designed to streamline identity management. It empowers organizations to manage permissions efficiently, enhancing security frameworks while addressing compliance needs. By focusing on visibility and control, it optimizes access to ensure the right resources are available to the right users, reducing excessive permission grants and potential security vulnerabilities.

What are the main features of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]?

Advanced Visibility: Gain insights into permissions to identify and address security risks.
Access Optimization: Align permissions with actual usage to prevent over-privileged access.
Compliance Integration: Streamline compliance processes with built-in reporting tools.

What benefits should you consider when evaluating Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]?

Improved Security Posture: Reduces risk by eliminating excessive permissions.
Enhanced Compliance: Eases regulatory compliance with robust auditing features.
Operational Efficiency: Saves time and resources by automating permission management.

In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] plays a crucial role in maintaining data integrity and regulatory compliance. Its implementation allows organizations to seamlessly integrate permission management into existing security infrastructures, providing tailored solutions that address sector-specific requirements and challenges.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Tenable, Idira by Palo Alto Networks and others in Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.