Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CQ Quality Management System vs OpenText Application Quality Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CQ Quality Management System
Ranking in Quality Management Software
6th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Application Qualit...
Ranking in Quality Management Software
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
208
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (4th), Test Management Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Quality Management Software category, the mindshare of CQ Quality Management System is 4.1%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 1.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Quality Management Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management1.4%
CQ Quality Management System4.1%
Other94.5%
Quality Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Use CQ Quality Management System?
Leave a review
GS
Partner at IS Nordic AS
Manages multiple releases seamlessly
We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Quality Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Performing Arts
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business39
Midsize Enterprise32
Large Enterprise161
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aphria Inc, Continental Contitech, Dialight, Digi-Key, CEAT Ltd.
Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
Find out what your peers are saying about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. OpenText Application Quality Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.