We performed a comparison between Correlsense SharePath and Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Correlsense SharePath is ranked 82nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is ranked 21st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 9 reviews. Correlsense SharePath is rated 8.0, while Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Correlsense SharePath writes "It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) writes "Good logging and tracing but does need more profiling capabilities". Correlsense SharePath is most compared with , whereas Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is most compared with AWS X-Ray, Datadog, Azure Monitor, Grafana and Amazon CloudWatch.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.