

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Cost Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
With 20 reports every month, that's 80 hours saved, equating to two man-weeks per month, or $8,000 in savings based on a $100 hourly rate for my architect.
We suggested they proceed with CoreStack, and after onboarding it to our offering, within three months, we received positive feedback from customers that we were able to reduce some of their costs.
It generates value addition on top of the Trusted Advisor report, which saves major effort for our resources.
The savings for the weekend ghost amounted to sixteen thousand dollars per month, and the BYOL optimization saved another eight thousand dollars per month in licensing fees.
Flexera Cloud Cost Management has helped my organization save money by 20% to 30%, as previously mentioned.
I have seen a return on investment with Flexera Cloud Cost Management as it provides an in-depth overview of unused resources, allowing me to stop or delete them to save money on billing.
CoreStack has positively impacted my organization by saving hours of time for reporting—for example, the governance report which my employees used to take at least four hours for one customer.
CoreStack support would be around a nine on a scale of one to ten.
I have interacted with CoreStack's customer support, and we managed to obtain a technical demo from their team for my team from time to time.
My advice is to define a FinOps operating model before focusing too much on the tool, ensuring clear ownership, a good tagging strategy, cost allocation rules, and agreed KPIs.
The customer support from Flexera team has been great, helping my organization integrate and utilize Flexera effectively.
Customer service is great because we have a managed services agreement with our vendor.
It generates and captures metrics of your workload, which meets our requirements all the time.
We haven't encountered any issues regarding scalability; the SaaS platform easily accommodates our growth.
I can scale up according to business requirements.
Currently there is a significant amount of data we need to fix in the system because we migrated from an old platform to a new platform and carried irrelevant or even incorrect data across.
I rate Flexera Cloud Cost Management's scalability quite highly, around eight out of ten, as it is well-suited to large enterprise environments, handling multiple cloud providers, subscription accounts, business units, and large volumes of cost and usage data.
The recommendations made in CoreStack to delete a machine have the potential to generate major cost savings.
We need more security features, particularly since the market is increasingly demanding better security tools for cloud management platforms, including cloud security posture assessments.
Specifically, integration with vulnerability management tools and ticketing tools like Jira was not available, so having that would be beneficial.
Flexera Cloud Cost Management can be improved by developing a normal chat interface or application where non-technical users do not have to navigate through Flexera API application or website.
Another suggestion is to deepen the AI-driven auto-remediation; Flexera Cloud Cost Management is excellent at providing recommendations, but it still requires a manual click to approve or a custom script to execute an action.
Specifically, I would want purchase orders created from an on-premises licensing perspective to be replicated or pulled through from a SaaS visibility view so that licensing tracking happens seamlessly.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is straightforward and has flexible pricing based on workload consumption.
I believe has been competitively priced across the market.
I had no concerns about pricing, setup cost, and licensing since the cost was nominal and good.
I remember briefly discussing the cost and had an understanding that there would be an expense associated with upgrading from the older version of Flexera to Flexera One edition that we have now.
The single pane of glass for multi-cloud cost optimization helps me day-to-day by bringing a lot of operational excellence; it saves a lot of time because rather than going to each and every account or multi-cloud portal, which takes a lot of time, having everything on a single pane of glass increases efficiency, delivers results in less time, and provides clear reporting that can be shared with the customer in PDF or CSV formats.
The best features CoreStack offers are primarily the recommendations for cost optimization for RDS and EC2 machines.
For example, from AWS, it provides visibility on EBS volumes that are not being used, and it gives recommendations to delete them and save some cost.
Flexera Cloud Cost Management provided complete visibility across our multi-cloud footprint, allowing us to identify zombie resources, idle dev environments, and unattached storage, resulting in an immediate fifteen to twenty percent reduction in monthly waste simply by cleaning up what we were not using.
The dashboard of Flexera Cloud Cost Management is easy to navigate and understand, providing a complete view of multi-cloud in a single platform, and the integration with AWS, Azure, or GCP is very smooth.
A particular strong differentiator regarding Flexera Cloud Cost Management is the ITAM and FinOps integration you have within the same solution, which is really rare in this market.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Flexera Cloud Cost Management | 1.4% |
| CoreStack | 1.3% |
| Other | 97.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
CoreStack offers powerful FinOps and governance capabilities, automated remediation, and cost optimization recommendations in a unified interface for multi-cloud environments, enhancing compliance and boosting cloud cost efficiency by 15%.
CoreStack's comprehensive approach to cloud management supports AWS, Azure, and GCP environments. Its features streamline cost management, tagging, and resource usage, providing crucial insights for policy management and spend tracking. By aligning governance with organizational structures and offering compliance with CIS benchmarks, CoreStack delivers detailed cost insights and optimizes billing operations. This reduces cloud spending and supports BillOps for generating customer invoices. While CoreStack excels in these areas, there's potential to improve stability, scalability, and UI responsiveness. Enhanced integration with SOAR platforms and addressing XDR console challenges would also be beneficial.
What are CoreStack's key features?In industries relying on cloud infrastructure, CoreStack proves invaluable for teams managing complex, multi-cloud environments. By integrating seamlessly with AWS, Azure, and GCP, organizations in sectors like finance, healthcare, and IT enjoy enhanced governance and FinOps capabilities, reducing costs and optimizing cloud operations.
Flexera Cloud Cost Management provides a comprehensive approach to managing and optimizing cloud expenses. It is designed to streamline cost management and efficiency for informed decision-making.
Flexera Cloud Cost Management offers capabilities to efficiently handle cloud spend by providing insights into cost control, budget management, and optimization strategies. It enables organizations to gain visibility into cloud expenses, allowing effective financial planning and operational efficiency. Targeted towards cost management, Flexera aids in identifying unused resources and facilitates cost savings across cloud platforms through automation and advanced analytics.
What are the most important features?Flexera Cloud Cost Management is implemented in a variety of industries, including finance, healthcare, and technology. It helps these sectors manage cloud expenses effectively by aligning cloud consumption with business objectives, supporting cost containment efforts, and enhancing operational workflows.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.