Coralogix vs IBM API Connect comparison

Coralogix and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Coralogix is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2. Coralogix holds a 0.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 9 Coralogix reviews

100 Views
68 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM API Connect

Read 76 IBM API Connect reviews

8,910 Views
6,632 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Coralogix

IBM API Connect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM API Connect and Coralogix are leading solutions in their domains, API management and analytics respectively. IBM API Connect is often preferred for its integration and automation strengths, whereas Coralogix is favored for its real-time insights and advanced analytics.

Features: IBM API Connect offers features such as comprehensive API lifecycle management, strong security protocols, and task automation. Coralogix delivers machine learning-driven insights, real-time data processing, and effective operational intelligence enhancements.

Room for Improvement: IBM API Connect could improve its user interface for better usability, enhance its analytics module, and simplify initial setup processes. Coralogix might benefit from expanding its integration capabilities with more third-party tools, reducing complexity in customizing alerts, and enhancing storage efficiency for high log volumes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM API Connect provides a detailed deployment process backed by substantial documentation, focusing on thorough onboarding. Coralogix promotes quick deployment and agile setup, supported by responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM API Connect requires a higher initial investment, offering long-term ROI through robust management tools. In contrast, Coralogix provides a cost-effective pricing structure aimed at quick ROI by optimizing operational costs through advanced analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. IBM API Connect Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. IBM API Connect

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in API Management

29th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (33rd), Log Management (39th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (42nd), Streaming Analytics (19th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

IBM API Connect

Ranking in API Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM API Connect is 6.4%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1915599

VP of Engineering at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up

We have asked for a couple of features from the company already. What typically happens is a lot of people - and developers are one of the biggest consumers of this product - go to this product to optimize their investigation process and specific configurations. That increases our data flow at times, so the cost changes. And a lot of changes happen due to that. We have asked the company to auto-revert the changes after a while so that the system works typically. We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change.

Read full review

KavitaChavan

Associate Manager at Baariz

Quite flexible and provides excellent performance for API gateway

The only disadvantage I can see is that it requires heavy hardware support, which can be considered quite expensive. In terms of new functionality, I think the analytics can be improved in V10. The analytics feature was better in the older version, 2.18. But in V10, it's not as flexible. When exporting analytics as KSP or JSON, it's not well formatted. They can work on enhancing the analytics part. Additionally, they can focus on reducing the hardware cost.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

More Coralogix pros

"It's quite flexible and easy to deploy, especially for beginners. It has almost all the features that an API gateway should have."

"The technical support is good. Whenever we need anything, we have our IT team work with IBM to change whatever requirement is needed."

"It has all of the tools that are needed for the specific mission."

"We are able to share those APIs instantly within the organization; even if we want to share it outside publicly, then we can have those capabilities."

"The solution provides a common place for all APIs, allowing for easy sharing and exchange of information between internal and external stakeholders."

"The solution offers a pretty good SLA."

"It allows enterprises to expose some of their tech to outside stakeholders."

"The product gathers data to measure API performance."

More IBM API Connect pros

Cons

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

More Coralogix cons

"While Azure API Management offers configurable scalability, IBM API Connect relies on Kubernetes clusters. This might seem manual and require defining cluster instances upfront, but it's completely customizable and not on-the-fly scaling. It's completely custom-driven, not on-the-fly scaling, which some may consider cumbersome."

"The integration of cloud-based services is where we're looking for improvement in this platform."

"The monetization of the API could be improved. The pricing for the consumer is also very important to improve this solution."

"Possible improvement is mainly around having more of the cloud oriented architecture bringing stability in adding new capabilities around security."

"The only downside where improvements are needed is probably on the licensing side."

"API Connect's analytics subsystem could be improved to make it easier to render content from the analytics system and offload it to an external database."

"One thing about API Connect that could be improved is the security schemes. There are so many security schemes, and from a product perspective, IBM could improve the user experience of the configuration security scheme."

"IBM API Connect could improve the security of the application and the integration."

More IBM API Connect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"The pricing is significantly high."

"It should be cheaper. It has a yearly licensing."

"I haven't seen anyone go from on-premise to the cloud. In fact, I am seeing people go from the cloud to on-premise because the costs can quickly grow on the cloud."

"The pricing is too expensive with IBM. Sometimes, we prefer to go with an open source or something more lightweight."

"Pricing for IBM API Connect varies, e.g. it could be subscription-based. Deploying it on private cloud also means you have to own most of the software licensing."

"It is expensive when compared to other products in this class. There were no extra fees for add-ons or technical support."

"I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"API Connect was highly expensive for us, but the decision to switch was made before I joined the company. It seems like the company bought it, but they didn't know how to use it. After two years, they decided to reevaluate and conduct some cost estimates."

More IBM API Connect pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

24%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

We need to reduce the number of logs generated by our system, which are substantial. We require some form of grouping or categorization of logs to identify them better. Additionally, we find that t...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM API Connect?

Publishers can easily identify, create, and publish APIs on the developer portal, defining plans, packages, and potentially billing rules.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?

Price depends on many factors like size of the deal, competitive factors, timing, customer profile or where the pricing for API Calls is very competitive comparing to any of the leader players.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?

The only downside where improvements are needed is probably on the licensing side. Scalability is an issue with IBM API Connect, making it an area where improvements are required.

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 31% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 25% of the time

Apigee vs IBM API Connect

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs IBM API Connect

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 7% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs IBM API Connect

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM API Connect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

April 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect

April 2025

Download IBM API Connect product report

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

IBM API Connect facilitates API management and integration in the financial sector. Companies use it to expose, secure, and manage APIs for banking, insurance, and fintech, deploying it on-premises, in the cloud, or as a hybrid solution.

IBM API Connect focuses on creating and monetizing APIs while enabling seamless transactions and integration with third-party services. It is vital for compliance with regulations and enhances external communication among institutions. With deployment options suitable for different environments, it supports centralized gateway management, robust security features, and comprehensive API lifecycle management. Users benefit from powerful analytics, user-friendly interfaces, and high performance with capabilities in message transformation and efficient monitoring.

What are the most important features?

Centralized Gateway: Manages all APIs through a single entry point.
Robust Security: Ensures API protection with advanced security measures.
Comprehensive API Lifecycle Management: Covers creation, deployment, and retirement of APIs.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies API creation and management tasks.
Powerful Analytics: Provides insights into API usage and performance.
Seamless Integration: Connects easily with third-party services and internal systems.
Flexible Deployment Options: Supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.
High Performance: Optimizes API performance and reduces latency.
Message Transformation: Manipulates and formats messages between different systems.
Visualization Tools: Enables clear and detailed views of API usage statistics.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

API Monetization: Generates additional revenue streams from APIs.
Enhanced Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry regulations and standards.
Improved External Communication: Facilitates integration and communication among financial institutions.
Technical Support: Benefit from reliable customer support and easy configuration.
Deployment Flexibility: Choose from on-premises, cloud, or hybrid options.

IBM API Connect is extensively implemented in the financial sector, enabling banking, insurance, and fintech services to manage APIs efficiently. Companies use it to ensure secure transactions, integration with third-party services, and compliance with regulatory standards. Its deployment flexibility accommodates different infrastructure needs, making it suitable for a wide range of financial applications.

IBM

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. IBM API Connect

April 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. IBM API Connect

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. IBM API Connect and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. IBM API Connect report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.