Coralogix vs IBM API Connect comparison

Coralogix and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Coralogix is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.2, while IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3. Coralogix holds a 0.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 11 Coralogix reviews

2,603 Views
78 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM API Connect

Read 76 IBM API Connect reviews

7,279 Views
7,061 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Coralogix

IBM API Connect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM API Connect and Coralogix are leading solutions in their domains, API management and analytics respectively. IBM API Connect is often preferred for its integration and automation strengths, whereas Coralogix is favored for its real-time insights and advanced analytics.

Features: IBM API Connect offers features such as comprehensive API lifecycle management, strong security protocols, and task automation. Coralogix delivers machine learning-driven insights, real-time data processing, and effective operational intelligence enhancements.

Room for Improvement: IBM API Connect could improve its user interface for better usability, enhance its analytics module, and simplify initial setup processes. Coralogix might benefit from expanding its integration capabilities with more third-party tools, reducing complexity in customizing alerts, and enhancing storage efficiency for high log volumes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM API Connect provides a detailed deployment process backed by substantial documentation, focusing on thorough onboarding. Coralogix promotes quick deployment and agile setup, supported by responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM API Connect requires a higher initial investment, offering long-term ROI through robust management tools. In contrast, Coralogix provides a cost-effective pricing structure aimed at quick ROI by optimizing operational costs through advanced analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. IBM API Connect Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. IBM API Connect

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in API Management

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (22nd), Log Management (21st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (23rd), Streaming Analytics (13th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

IBM API Connect

Ranking in API Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM API Connect is 6.2%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Jorge Florez

Head SRE Latam at PayU

SaaS platform used by developers to store and conveniently search for logs

If a company has the budget and the log service is critical for them, I would say use Coralogix. It is a very good service for that. I would rate Coralogix an eight out of ten. It is an excellent service for storing logs for a long time. The capacity is unlimited for unindexed logs. The cost model is also very efficient because you pay for the ingested data per month. This can be compared to a solution like New Relic where you have to pay it upfront and cannot limit the data ingestion. Coralogix provides an easy way to search for logs and to visualize them. This a great feature because developers are constantly looking for or browsing logs.

Read full review

Shanmugasundaram Shanmuganathan

Solutions Architect at Synechron

Offers basic API orchestration and provides robust security and governance features

While Azure API Management offers configurable scalability, IBM API Connect relies on Kubernetes clusters. This might seem manual and require defining cluster instances upfront, but it's completely customizable and not on-the-fly scaling. It's completely custom-driven, not on-the-fly scaling, which some may consider cumbersome. Overall, I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. Almost all applications we've been exposing lately go through this middleware, so it's used extensively. There are around sixty applications directly using it, but six Kubernetes clusters serve those applications. It's heavily used for integration, including system-to-system integration and product integrations. Our usage has been increasing year-on-year based on our needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"The most valuable feature of Coralogix is that it is a very good vendor for metrics."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

More Coralogix pros

"I have found the API Management to be most valuable."

"The gateway is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"The capabilities are very good."

"The most valuable feature for me is the ability to distribute work among our API developers, so we don't have to do all the work as IBM API Connect administrators and IBM DataPower administrators."

"Security is well organized and managed within the solution."

"The product gathers data to measure API performance."

"WSRR is a powerful component for getting the endpoints."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is very easy to use and is something that is easily configurable."

More IBM API Connect pros

Cons

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"The features we were missing in the past were related to the way we see our metrics and aggregate our data."

"The customizable dashboards haven't really helped with my company's efficiency at all, and I think there's room for improvement."

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

More Coralogix cons

"While Azure API Management offers configurable scalability, IBM API Connect relies on Kubernetes clusters. This might seem manual and require defining cluster instances upfront, but it's completely customizable and not on-the-fly scaling. It's completely custom-driven, not on-the-fly scaling, which some may consider cumbersome."

"We've had some issues upgrading to the latest version of the solution."

"The developmental process is not quite user-friendly."

"The platform’s integration with the payment gateway needs enhancement. The setup process and support services could be improved."

"Firstly, the pricing model, when compared to other open sources, is high. Secondly, the availability of resources in the market, specifically the developers available in the market, is not so much."

"The solution could improve security and performance."

"The documentation needs to be a bit better."

"I would like to see support for non-Java based services. We struggle a bit to be able to deploy and connect our .NET services because of things like data types. We had to map a couple of things. For one solution provider, we had to move them to .NET Core before we could use it properly. I would like to see more agnostic tool service platforms rather than moving it more towards Java or open source."

More IBM API Connect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"API Connect was highly expensive for us, but the decision to switch was made before I joined the company. It seems like the company bought it, but they didn't know how to use it. After two years, they decided to reevaluate and conduct some cost estimates."

"It's an expensive product."

"API Connect is quite pricey."

"There was a need to purchase an upfront license or a one-time license or upfront license, but I cannot remember the details about it clearly."

"This is a licensed product. If your company is looking to obtain a license, you have to work with IBM partners."

"API Connect's license cost could be a little lower. But, unfortunately, there aren't many open-source API gateways. Ideally, some new developers could come up with a minimum-functionality open-source solution."

"We pay for the IBM API Connect monthly. We only need to pay the standard licensing fee."

"IBM API Connect could be cheaper."

More IBM API Connect pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Insurance Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

Change might not be the correct word, but with every service, there is always room to improve. They are improving their services daily and deploy new features. When we had missing features that we ...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM API Connect?

Publishers can easily identify, create, and publish APIs on the developer portal, defining plans, packages, and potentially billing rules.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?

Pricing depends on how many instances run across environments. I don't deal with licensing, but compared to other IBM products, the licensing is not significantly higher.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?

When comparing API Gateway with DataPower Gateway, several features in DataPower Gateway are absent in the APIC layer. Examples include the lack of connectivity to MQ ( /categories/message-queue-mq...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 25% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 9% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 26% of the time

Apigee vs IBM API Connect

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs IBM API Connect

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 6% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs IBM API Connect

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM API Connect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

August 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect

August 2025

Download IBM API Connect product report

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

IBM API Connect facilitates API management and integration in the financial sector. Companies use it to expose, secure, and manage APIs for banking, insurance, and fintech, deploying it on-premises, in the cloud, or as a hybrid solution.

IBM API Connect focuses on creating and monetizing APIs while enabling seamless transactions and integration with third-party services. It is vital for compliance with regulations and enhances external communication among institutions. With deployment options suitable for different environments, it supports centralized gateway management, robust security features, and comprehensive API lifecycle management. Users benefit from powerful analytics, user-friendly interfaces, and high performance with capabilities in message transformation and efficient monitoring.

What are the most important features?

Centralized Gateway: Manages all APIs through a single entry point.
Robust Security: Ensures API protection with advanced security measures.
Comprehensive API Lifecycle Management: Covers creation, deployment, and retirement of APIs.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies API creation and management tasks.
Powerful Analytics: Provides insights into API usage and performance.
Seamless Integration: Connects easily with third-party services and internal systems.
Flexible Deployment Options: Supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.
High Performance: Optimizes API performance and reduces latency.
Message Transformation: Manipulates and formats messages between different systems.
Visualization Tools: Enables clear and detailed views of API usage statistics.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

API Monetization: Generates additional revenue streams from APIs.
Enhanced Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry regulations and standards.
Improved External Communication: Facilitates integration and communication among financial institutions.
Technical Support: Benefit from reliable customer support and easy configuration.
Deployment Flexibility: Choose from on-premises, cloud, or hybrid options.

IBM API Connect is extensively implemented in the financial sector, enabling banking, insurance, and fintech services to manage APIs efficiently. Companies use it to ensure secure transactions, integration with third-party services, and compliance with regulatory standards. Its deployment flexibility accommodates different infrastructure needs, making it suitable for a wide range of financial applications.

IBM

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. IBM API Connect

July 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. IBM API Connect

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. IBM API Connect and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. IBM API Connect report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.