Contrast Security Assess vs DoveRunner Mobile Application Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Contrast Security and DoveRunner are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Contrast Security is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.8, while DoveRunner is ranked #32 with an average rating of 7.5. Contrast Security holds a 1.7% mindshare in AS, compared to DoveRunner’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Contrast Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of DoveRunner users who would recommend it.

Contrast Security Assess

Read 15 Contrast Security Assess reviews

5,122 Views
3,739 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DoveRunner Mobile Applicati...

Read 2 DoveRunner Mobile Application Security reviews

799 Views
775 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Contrast Security Assess

DoveRunner Mobile Applicati...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Contrast Security Assess and DoveRunner Mobile Application Security compete in application security. Contrast Security Assess seems to have the upper hand due to its competitive pricing and strong support, while DoveRunner Mobile Application Security offers extensive features with a higher investment.

Features: Contrast Security Assess provides advanced real-time security analysis, seamless integration within the DevOps pipeline, and enhances workflow efficiency. DoveRunner Mobile Application Security excels in robust vulnerability detection, platform compatibility, and is valued for its comprehensive security framework.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Contrast Security Assess features straightforward deployment, thorough documentation, and proactive customer service. DoveRunner Mobile Application Security offers smooth deployment with comprehensive onboarding services, ensuring full support during setup and ongoing operations.

Pricing and ROI: Contrast Security Assess offers cost-effective pricing and delivers a significant return on investment by reducing security flaw detection time. DoveRunner Mobile Application Security, despite needing a higher upfront investment, is perceived to provide substantial long-term returns, particularly in mobile application security scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Contrast Security Assess vs. DoveRunner Mobile Application Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Contrast Security Assess vs. DoveRunner Mobile Application Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Contrast Security Assess

Ranking in Application Security Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (12th)

DoveRunner Mobile Applicati...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

2.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Contrast Security Assess is 1.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DoveRunner Mobile Application Security is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Contrast Security Assess	1.7%
DoveRunner Mobile Application Security	0.4%
Other	97.9%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ryan Flake

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Real-time assessments have improved remediation speed and reduced time spent on authentication issues

I do find that here and there with Contrast Security Assess there are user interface issues, particularly with how they work with libraries. The way that it works is people have access to library data for all applications, not just the applications that they should have access to. However, they are trying to fix that. The way the libraries are handled with Contrast Security Assess could use some work. I know that there is an additional service tier that allows for more in-depth library data. These are small things. Contrast support has been great in fixing any issues or getting back to us with questions. They seem to really be dedicated to the product.

Read full review

Vikas Kejriwal

Engineering Manager at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Protection has secured our mobile algorithms and now testing guidelines need improvement

The best features DoveRunner Mobile Application Security offers include its simple integration, which is basically a pipeline, making it a plug-and-play type of approach that automatically takes care of all the heavy work. Regarding how the automatic protection works, I appreciate the simplicity of this particular SDK, as I just need to integrate it using Xcode directly and use CocoaPods to install it in applications, which simplifies the security layers along with all the signing and submission of the application to the App Store. DoveRunner Mobile Application Security has positively impacted my organization so far by alleviating a constant fear that our proprietary algorithms or shaders might be leaked, which could affect our application's revenue, and we are optimistic about achieving secure integration after launching in production.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From a percentage perspective, somewhere around 90 percent of the time we used to spend has been given back to our team, because the false positive rate with Contrast is less than 5 percent."

"The time it saves us is on the order of one US-based FTE, a security person at an average pay level, and at a bare minimum Contrast helps us like that resource; it's like having a CISSP guy, in the US, on our payroll."

"It has helped us to improve the overall security posture of the company, we are able to address the findings before they have been reported by a third-party, and it has also helped us to gain our customers' trust."

"Contrast was a very complete solution; it met all of our technical requirements and it was really the only IAST product that felt like a real product."

"This has changed the way that developers are looking at usage of third-party libraries, upfront. It's changing our model of development and our culture of development to ensure that there is more thought being put into the usage of third-party libraries."

"I am impressed with the product's identification of alerts and vulnerabilities."

"It is a stable solution...Contrast Security Assess is one of the first players in this market, so they have experience and customers, especially abroad. Overall, it's a good product."

"No other tool does the runtime scanning like Contrast does. Other static analysis tools do static scanning, but Contrast is runtime analysis, when the routes are exercised. That's when the scan happens. This is a tool that has a very unique capability compared to other tools. That's what I like most about Contrast, that it's runtime."

More Contrast Security Assess pros

"After exploring DoveRunner Mobile Application Security, I can say that you are getting everything on a single platform."

"DoveRunner Mobile Application Security has positively impacted my organization so far by alleviating a constant fear that our proprietary algorithms or shaders might be leaked, which could affect our application's revenue, and we are optimistic about achieving secure integration after launching in production."

Cons

"I would rate Contrast Security Assess a seven out of ten because I think it's a good product, better than average, but I'm sure it has a lot of room for growth."

"Regarding the solution's OSS feature, the one drawback that we do have is that it does not have client-side support. We'll be missing identification of libraries like jQuery or JavaScript, and such, that are client-side."

"Contrast's ability to support upgrades on the actual agents that get deployed is limited. Our environment is pretty much entirely Java. There are no updates associated with that. You have to actually download a new version of the .jar file and push that out to your servers where your app is hosted. That can be quite cumbersome from a change-management perspective."

"The product's retesting part needs improvement. The tool also needs improvement in the suggestions provided for fixing vulnerabilities. It relies more on documentation rather than on quick fixes."

"Contrast Security Assess covers a wide range of applications like .NET Framework, Java, PSP, Node.js, etc. But there are some like Ubuntu and the .NET Core which are not covered. They have it in their roadmap to have these agents. If they have that, we will have complete coverage."

"I think Contrast can also integrate with some AI tools and provide chat features if possible, so in case we have any more questions, we can chat with that chatbot and get remediations, which I believe would be a better enhancement to Contrast."

"Regarding Contrast Security Assess's AI capabilities, I think they are missing a huge opportunity because they could lead the way in automatic testing and AI security testing, but currently, they do not offer this functionality, which is a shame."

"The solution needs to improve flexibility...The scalability of the product is a problem in the solution, especially from a commercial perspective."

More Contrast Security Assess cons

"I think improved guidelines could be added regarding testing on the security aspect."

"As I am in the exploration phase of DoveRunner Mobile Application Security, I chose a rating of eight."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a tiered licensing model. The more you buy, as you cross certain quantity thresholds, the pricing changes. If you have a smaller environment, your licensing costs are going to be different than a larger environment... The licensing is primarily per application. An application can be as many agents as you need. If you've got 10 development servers and 20 production servers and 50 QA servers, all of those agents can be reporting as a single application that utilizes one license."

"The solution is expensive."

"For what it offers, it's a very reasonable cost. The way that it is priced is extremely straightforward. It works on the number of applications that you use, and you license a server. It is something that is extremely fair, because it doesn't take into consideration the number of requests, etc. It is only priced based on the number of onboarded applications. It suits our model as well, because we have huge traffic. Our number of applications is not that large, so the pricing works great for us."

"You only get one license for an application. Ours are very big, monolithic applications with millions of lines of code. We were able to apply one license to one monolithic application, which is great. We are happy with the licensing. Pricing-wise, they are industry-standard, which is fine."

"I like the per-application licensing model... We just license the app and we look at different vulnerabilities on that app and we remediate within the app. It's simpler."

"The product's pricing is low. I would rate it a two out of ten."

"The good news is that the agent itself comes in two different forms: the unlicensed form and the licensed form. Unlicensed gives use of that software composition analysis for free. Thereafter, if you apply a license to that same agent, that's when the instrumentation takes hold. So one of my suggestions is to do what we're doing: Deploy the agent to as many applications as possible, with just the SCA feature turned on with no license applied, and then you can be more choosy and pick which teams will get the license applied."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Contrast Security Assess?

I was not involved in the negotiation of pricing for Contrast Security Assess, but I am somewhat familiar with setup cost and licensing. Licensing costs are fairly high compared to other DAST and S...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Contrast Security Assess?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Contrast Security Assess?

I would give Contrast Security Assess a score of 8 out of 10. That is a small little issue, but it is a great product and I would recommend it to others. There are a couple things that could be imp...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DoveRunner Mobile Application Security?

I think improved guidelines could be added regarding testing on the security aspect.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DoveRunner Mobile Application Security?

My main use case for DoveRunner Mobile Application Security is to protect our own developed shaders APIs and certain algorithms we have worked on, as we do not want them to be reverse-engineered or...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DoveRunner Mobile Application Security?

The specific outcomes I hope to see include a decrease in piracy incidents and hopefully a secured hit on the revenue we receive from jailbroken devices or any reverse engineering after integrating...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veracode vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 6% of the time

Mend.io vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

Quotium Seeker vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

Oligo vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

More Contrast Security Assess Competitors

HackerOne vs DoveRunner Mobile Application Security

Compared 50% of the time

GitHub vs DoveRunner Mobile Application Security

Compared 20% of the time

Sqreen vs DoveRunner Mobile Application Security

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs DoveRunner Mobile Application Security

Compared 10% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs DoveRunner Mobile Application Security

Compared 9% of the time

More DoveRunner Mobile Application Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Contrast Security Assess

October 2026

Download Contrast Security Assess product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

September 2026

DoveRunner Mobile Application Security report

Download DoveRunner Mobile Application Security product report

Also Known As

Contrast Assess

No data available

Overview

Contrast Security Assess is an IAST platform known for accurate vulnerability detection. It integrates into development workflows, offering real-time insights into security issues with minimal false positives, supporting legacy applications and enhancing code security visibility.

Designed to integrate seamlessly into DevOps workflows, Contrast Security Assess automates real-time vulnerability detection and reduces false positives through its powerful IAST features. By continuously monitoring vulnerabilities, it provides a robust option for securing legacy applications and identifying vulnerabilities without lengthy scans. This cloud-hosted platform supports numerous programming languages, making it versatile for security testing across enterprise environments. Users benefit from detailed reports that pinpoint exact code locations requiring remediation, enhancing speed and efficiency in addressing security concerns.

What are the key features of Contrast Security Assess?

IAST Technology: Delivers accurate vulnerability detection with reduced false positives.
Seamless Integration: Integrates into development processes, supporting real-time vulnerability detection.
Open Source Security: Analyzes third-party libraries for vulnerabilities.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides valuable insights with real-time security feedback for developers.
API Interface: Enhances operational efficiency and streamlining with minimal false positives.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Security Visibility: Offers comprehensive insights across application environments.
Speed and Efficiency: Quick identification and remediation of vulnerabilities accelerate development.
Operational Streamlining: Seamless integration into DevOps workflows improves productivity.
Legacy Application Support: Effective for securing existing applications with ongoing monitoring.

Companies in industries requiring high levels of application security, such as finance and healthcare, implement Contrast Security Assess for its ability to enhance visibility and detect vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle. Its seamless integration with DevOps processes makes it ideal for environments that prioritize agility while maintaining stringent security standards.

Contrast Security

DoveRunner Mobile Application Security offers comprehensive protection features, ensuring the safeguarding of mobile applications against threats. It provides a trusted environment where sensitive information remains secure, catering to the advanced needs of tech-savvy users.

DoveRunner Mobile Application Security stands out by delivering a reliable method of securing applications on mobile platforms. Users experience robust protection that manages risks effectively. Its use cases show notable strength in threat detection, vulnerability assessment, and non-intrusive security implementation. This approach addresses the core challenges in mobile security directly, enabling companies to maintain a solid security posture.

What are the key features of DoveRunner Mobile Application Security?

Threat Detection: Monitors applications for potential threats, reducing the risk of data breaches.
Vulnerability Assessment: Identifies weak points within mobile apps, allowing for timely intervention.
Non-intrusive Security: Ensures user privacy and performance are not compromised during protective activities.
Custom Reporting: Provides detailed analysis on security metrics, aiding in informed decision-making.

What benefits should reviewers look for?

Enhanced Security: Boosts user confidence by significantly reducing the likelihood of app-related compromises.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers security management costs through automated solutions.
Scalability: Grows with user demand, ensuring protection scales with app usage.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting industry-specific regulations, simplifying legal adherence.

In healthcare, DoveRunner Mobile Application Security helps protect patient data by ensuring compliance with data protection standards. E-commerce platforms benefit from secure transaction processes, while financial services utilize its features to maintain high levels of consumer trust in mobile banking solutions. With diverse industry applications, it meets specific demands efficiently.

DoveRunner

Sample Customers

Williams-Sonoma, Autodesk, HUAWEI, Chromeriver, RingCentral, Demandware.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Contrast Security Assess vs. DoveRunner Mobile Application Security

September 2026

Free Report: Contrast Security Assess vs. DoveRunner Mobile Application Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Contrast Security Assess vs. DoveRunner Mobile Application Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Contrast Security Assess vs. DoveRunner Mobile Application Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.