We performed a comparison between Comodo RMM and TeamViewer Remote Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Comodo RMM are the security antivirus and the ability to use other applications like the PSA and the ticketing system on one dashboard."
"The management feature is very good. You get a complete and clear view of the employment tool on Linux, Mac, and Windows operating systems (even on mobile). Third-party integration is also possible (e.g., IBM, Apple, etc.)."
"We like the auto containment feature."
"It's easy to use and maintain."
"The most valuable feature is the remote management capabilities."
"What I like about TeamViewer Remote Management is the chat feature on the dashboard, which is very useful. The solution also has a meeting feature, but I don't use that. The remote feature and other features of TeamViewer Remote Management also work fine, so it's a good solution."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use. Using this solution enables us to get support easily."
"The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management is very simple."
"The product is very stable."
"The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management is very simple."
"It's considered a trusted application."
"The solution needs further integration with other software tools like a CRM and other accounting tools. Not having this integration makes Comodo RMM limited in functionality. Additionally, more network management features would be good to have in the next release."
"Comodo RMM is really, really slow to load, and connecting with most of my clients takes a while."
"They should integrate email security in the same solution."
"AnyDesk is easier compared to TeamViewer Remote Management since there is no password. We use AnyDesk more."
"Maybe TeamViewer could be improved with more scalability."
"There have been some delays in the past due to unstable internet connection."
"Licensing has always been a concern, as it can be costly when we need simultaneous access for multiple users."
"One feature to add would be a mobile remote feature."
"The solution is a bit expensive. It could be cheaper."
"The compatibility needs improvement in TeamViewer Remote Management because there's some incompatibility in some versions of the solution. Some solutions require the higher-performing version of TeamViewer Remote Management. Otherwise, there's incompatibility. The security provided by TeamViewer Remote Management in terms of data transfer also needs improvement. I'd like to see more features in the next release of TeamViewer Remote Management because it's still lacking in features. It would also be good for TeamViewer Remote Management to have a built-in remoting program similar to what Itarian has."
"The price for the license could be improved, as well as the setup could be easier."
Comodo RMM is ranked 13th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 3 reviews while TeamViewer Remote Management is ranked 3rd in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 33 reviews. Comodo RMM is rated 8.4, while TeamViewer Remote Management is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Comodo RMM writes "Great remote controlling and monitoring features with a competitive price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Remote Management writes "Highly stable and scalable solution". Comodo RMM is most compared with Atera, NinjaOne and Kaseya VSA, whereas TeamViewer Remote Management is most compared with Azure Bastion, NinjaOne, Datto Remote Monitoring and Management and Kaseya VSA. See our Comodo RMM vs. TeamViewer Remote Management report.
See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
