Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Commvault Active Copy Management [EOL] vs Dell AppSync comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Commvault Active Copy Manag...
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Dell AppSync
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Copy Data Management (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

Enrico Boseli - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful disaster recovery, effective copy replication, but complex deployment
The primary use of the solution is for backup and disaster recovery for medium to large size companies.  The solution's most valuable features are copy replication, instant recovery, and disaster recovery. The solution could be adapted to fit other use cases for smaller companies.…
Rhett Waldock - PeerSpot reviewer
Simple to install, reliable, and has good technical support
There were some limitations in the product that prompted us to shift away from it. You could only have one AppSync profile per server to target where the data could be replicated to. There were a few specific feature limitations in terms of flexibility that required the development of an alternative. However, that was the only flaw. In relation to, the replication destinations. We wanted to collect data from multiple systems and then replicate it on a single system. AppSync was based on a one-to-one replication footprint, which was the limitation that we had encountered. We needed to combine several systems into one. That was one of the scenarios provided by the solution. I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I find most valuable about this solution is that it is robust!"
"The solution's most valuable features are copy replication, instant recovery, and disaster recovery."
"The product's technical support is very good."
"I believe one of the advantages we saw was that the configuration was manageable."
"This solution is very helpful and easy to use."
 

Cons

"The solution should be offered at a better price."
"The solution could be adapted to fit other use cases for smaller companies."
"I would like to see a scaled down version to cater to SME needs, where the licensing model is exchanged for a pay per use model."
"It would be helpful if this product has features for transferring to the cloud."
"I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very effective for the money you spend. They need to have better competent IT department assistants in order to get the best out of the solution."
"I believe we paid them on a yearly basis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Copy Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Healthcare Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
AppSync, Replication Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expert International GmbH
Getronics
Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce, IBM, Hitachi Vantara and others in Copy Data Management. Updated: June 2025.
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.