We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"Low code development."
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"The stability is very good."
"I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."
"OpenText Documentum has improved availability and performance in our organization."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"We primarily use it for storing documents. We host a variety of documents in OpenText Documentum. This includes raw files, analyzed files, and documents in multiple formats."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."
"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
"They should develop something so that bugs don't happen in our project. We make changes manually and some bugs happen."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
"The documentation often leaves customers feeling somewhat frustrated, as OpenText seems to expect customers to remind them constantly about the need for better documentation, as they don't provide clear guidance on their documentation practices."
"The user interface can be improved."
"In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText has some products that allow you to control your checks, invoices, and so on. They have exciting approaches to converting pictures to text, but the tool for business process management isn't easy to use. The GIU is not so good."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 49th in Business Process Management (BPM) while OpenText Documentum is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
