We compared Collibra Lineage and Microsoft Purview based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Collibra Lineage focuses on providing clear data lineage visibility, top-notch customer service, reasonable pricing, and beneficial ROI. In contrast, Microsoft Purview emphasizes effective data asset management, user-friendly interface, reasonable pricing, and positive ROI. Users suggest Collibra Lineage improve its interface and performance, while Microsoft Purview users desire enhanced functionality and integration.
Features: Collibra Lineage's most valuable feature is its clear visibility into data lineage, helping users understand data flow and make informed decisions. Microsoft Purview excels in managing data assets, facilitating collaboration, and offering robust data cataloging capabilities.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Collibra Lineage is described as minimal and hassle-free, while Microsoft Purview offers comparatively low setup costs. Both products have received positive feedback for their reasonable pricing structures and flexible licensing options., Collibra Lineage provides significant ROI by improving data quality, aiding compliance, and enhancing data governance efforts. Users value its user-friendly interface and seamless integration with other tools. Microsoft Purview also generates positive ROI by managing data assets, enhancing governance, and accelerating analytics processes. Its user-friendly interface, integration capabilities, centralized data discovery, cost savings, and improved decision-making are highly appreciated.
Room for Improvement: Collibra Lineage could improve its interface, speed, performance, and comprehensiveness in capturing and representing data lineage relationships. Users suggest more customization options and flexibility in exporting and sharing lineage information. On the other hand, Microsoft Purview needs enhancements in functionality, user-friendliness, data classification capabilities, search filters, integration with other Microsoft products, collaboration features, and data ingestion processes.
Deployment and customer support: The feedback on Collibra Lineage indicates that the duration required for deployment and setup can vary, with some users taking three months for deployment and an additional week for setup. However, others only required a week for both phases. On the other hand, users of Microsoft Purview reported similar variations, with some needing three months for deployment and a week for setup, while others required just a week for both phases. This suggests that both products have similar variances in the time required for establishing a new tech solution., Collibra Lineage: Users highly regard Collibra Lineage's customer service, praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and prompt assistance. The knowledgeable and friendly representatives provide top-notch support. Microsoft Purview: Users express satisfaction with Microsoft Purview's customer service, deeming it helpful and responsive. The support provided effectively caters to their needs.
The summary above is based on 48 interviews we conducted recently with Collibra Lineage and Microsoft Purview users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"We find the most valuable feature of this solution to be the lineage aspect."
"It shows how the data was transformed on the way and how the solutions were derived. This is the essence of the tool and why it is so powerful."
"The solution makes data more discoverable and transparent."
"The most valuable features of Collibra Lineage are the multiple options for automation. Additionally, if you have a scenario where automation does not work, you have the option to manually create the lineage. The solution does not force you to always go through an automated way where you have broken lineage and you are stuck without a lineage."
"The diagrams are good for data visualization."
"The solution has very good online assistance."
"My favorite Purview feature is auto-scanning. Once we set up Purview, we can automatically scan multiple data sources when new data comes into specific databases, like SQL and Oracle. We don't need to rediscover the new data or do anything manually because it automatically happens."
"The audit log has been a lifesaver for a lot of reasons. Historically, when using SaaS products, there were always questions about how the audit was going and whether we were sufficient out of the box. Purview has many capabilities available through centralized reporting that provide a view of a specific segment."
"It starts off with records management, insider risk management, and information protection. And there is the discovery of the clouds, and we can get analytics on that as well, so that we know which user is using which cloud application and for how much time. The Activity explorer tells us which user was transferring out what data at what moment and on which device, including the serial number."
"The product has helped us save both time and money."
"One of the best features is the classification rules, especially the scan rule sets. They are really useful, especially when we need to understand the current data the company has to ensure that all the problematic data can be put under someone's responsibility."
"Their data labeling or data classification is particularly valuable because we want to categorize all of our data into confidential, public, or internal."
"The most valuable feature is the tracking activity and device onboarding."
"The custom classifications are one of the most valuable features."
"The workflow documentation must be improved."
"The product must be cheaper."
"Before you can use this solution, you have to make a lot of changes to how you measure your information in your organization, the data governance and policies, and the organizational structures that use them. Many companies believe that if they purchase the licenses for the tool that they have done the job, but this is far from the case with this tool."
"Collibra Lineage could improve connectively. If they can offer more out-of-the-box connectors, which come as in a package compared to you having to go and buy a lot in the marketplace for certain specific connectors."
"Collibra doesn't provide support for integration for SAP Info Steward directly with Collibra."
"We would like this solution to be able to connect directly to the databases, so we can pull directly from Databank without manual intervention."
"The Microsoft Purview data connector platform, which supports ingestion from non-Microsoft data sources, can be somewhat complex."
"I'd like to see them improve the training for implementing this type of solution."
"he one thing it doesn't do is data quality."
"I would like to have AI functionality on the dashboard to help me analyze and report on the data that we capture using Purview on a daily basis."
"Data quality has been a highly requested feature among customers."
"There are some non-Microsoft file formats that are not supported."
"Another area for improvement is in managing the business glossary terms. If they could provide the same type of method that we use to configure the scan rule sets, that would be helpful. Currently, there is no option like this, so we have to do it manually. Automatic detection would be great."
"I would like to have complete video documentation for training."
Collibra Lineage is ranked 9th in Data Governance with 6 reviews while Microsoft Purview is ranked 1st in Data Governance with 48 reviews. Collibra Lineage is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Purview is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Collibra Lineage writes "User-friendly with good metadata management but needs more time to mature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview writes "User friendly with good documentation but needs to cover more non-Microsoft use cases". Collibra Lineage is most compared with MANTA Flow, Alation Data Catalog, erwin Data Intelligence by Quest, OneTrust DataGovernance and Protegrity Data Security, whereas Microsoft Purview is most compared with Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, Varonis Platform, Informatica Axon and BigID. See our Collibra Lineage vs. Microsoft Purview report.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
These two are suites of 'tools' for metadata management. I would ask first that you list 'what' you are wanting to achieve with such tools. Data Catalog? Data Lineage? Table level or Column level lineage? Data Quality detection, etc, etc.
Your answers will be critical as you engage various vendors as each may say they do 'it all', but the reality is something less. Also, do you need to manage metadata across heterogeneous systems, just Azure, or others, because some tools are great if used on their 'native' platform, but not so great integrating with other platforms.
You may also want to consider Quest/erwin Data Intelligence Suite. I have implemented this solution and it is one of the best. I would add that some tools tend to 'overwhelm' your users with all they can do. So be careful that whatever you bring in will not become 'shelf-ware'.